On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:00:46 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
One more thing; which profile (/etc/make.profile or
/etc/portage/make.profile) do you have?
To make things easier, please post the output from emerge --info.
This shows all USE flags in use, not just those you have explicitly set,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
To make things easier, please post the output from emerge --info.
Neil,
Great idea. Output attached.
PS:
emerge -pv thunar[udev] pulls in gnome-base/gfvs-1.12.3
emerge -pv gvfs pulls in gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1
Thank
120910 Chris Stankevitz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem seems to be the use of static libraries
The only place I use a static library/thing is Busybox.
I temporarily worked around by adding xfce-base/thunar -udev
to package.use.
Thank you to all who are following this.
I used emerge -vptd to get some debugging info. This is the reason
emerge wants to bring in the ~amd64 to my stable system:
Parent:(xfce-base/thunar-1.4.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
Depstring: || ( =gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1[udisks,udev]
120911 Chris Stankevitz wrote:
I used emerge -vptd to get some debugging info. This is the reason
emerge wants to bring in the ~amd64 to my stable system:
Parent:(xfce-base/thunar-1.4.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
Depstring: || ( =gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1[udisks,udev]
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Questions (3)-(5)
This should have said (2)-(4).
===
The problem is solved in the Ubuntu sense. I suspect that I
encountered some kind of portage bug or oddity on the way.
I solved the problem by:
1. removed
Am Montag, 10. September 2012, 17:53:23 schrieb Chris Stankevitz:
I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not
come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset.
Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages
and deal with
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not
come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset.
Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages
I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not
come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset.
Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages
and deal with slot conflicts and static-libs to install a file
manager? FYI I am
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not
come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset.
Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not
come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset.
Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Try reemerging world with USE=-static -static-libs, and then try to
emerge thunar also with USE=-static -static-libs.
Canek,
Thank you for your help. I
1. added -static -static-libs to /etc/make.conf USE.
2. emerge
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I got farther this time, but it seems that emerge is still asking a lot of me.
Eventhough I think it's odd (and a sign that I screwed up somewhere),
I can satisfy the USE flag requests and the ~amd64
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem seems to be the use of static libraries
I temporarily worked around by adding xfce-base/thunar -udev to
package.use. Somehow building thunar with udev introduced the mess.
Chris
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I see your USE
Canek,
Thank you for your help. My USE flags are pretty benign. I'm
beginning to suspect something is grossly wrong with my setup. Below
I will post my USE line from make.conf and my entire
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
# 2012-09-10: appease thunar
xfce-base/thunar -udev
This makes no sense; the udev flag in thunar only asks for
=sys-fs/udev-171, which is stable. Are you sure you don't have
anything in
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
# 2012-09-10: appease thunar
xfce-base/thunar -udev
This makes no sense; the udev flag in thunar only asks for
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
=sys-fs/udev-171, which is stable. Are you sure you don't have
anything in /etc/portage/package.keywords?
I know it sounds absurd, but... I have no package.keywords file. My
package.use is small and benign. My
18 matches
Mail list logo