Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:00:46 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: One more thing; which profile (/etc/make.profile or /etc/portage/make.profile) do you have? To make things easier, please post the output from emerge --info. This shows all USE flags in use, not just those you have explicitly set,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: To make things easier, please post the output from emerge --info. Neil, Great idea. Output attached. PS: emerge -pv thunar[udev] pulls in gnome-base/gfvs-1.12.3 emerge -pv gvfs pulls in gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1 Thank

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Philip Webb
120910 Chris Stankevitz wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: The problem seems to be the use of static libraries The only place I use a static library/thing is Busybox. I temporarily worked around by adding xfce-base/thunar -udev to package.use.

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Chris Stankevitz
Thank you to all who are following this. I used emerge -vptd to get some debugging info. This is the reason emerge wants to bring in the ~amd64 to my stable system: Parent:(xfce-base/thunar-1.4.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) Depstring: || ( =gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1[udisks,udev]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Philip Webb
120911 Chris Stankevitz wrote: I used emerge -vptd to get some debugging info. This is the reason emerge wants to bring in the ~amd64 to my stable system: Parent:(xfce-base/thunar-1.4.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) Depstring: || ( =gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1[udisks,udev]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: Questions (3)-(5) This should have said (2)-(4). === The problem is solved in the Ubuntu sense. I suspect that I encountered some kind of portage bug or oddity on the way. I solved the problem by: 1. removed

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Montag, 10. September 2012, 17:53:23 schrieb Chris Stankevitz: I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset. Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages and deal with

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset. Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages

[gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Stankevitz
I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset. Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages and deal with slot conflicts and static-libs to install a file manager? FYI I am

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset. Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: I installed xfce4-meta and was a little surprised to see it did not come with thunar. When I tried to install it, portage became upset. Question: is it normal that I would have to ~amd64 a bunch of packages

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: Try reemerging world with USE=-static -static-libs, and then try to emerge thunar also with USE=-static -static-libs. Canek, Thank you for your help. I 1. added -static -static-libs to /etc/make.conf USE. 2. emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] I got farther this time, but it seems that emerge is still asking a lot of me. Eventhough I think it's odd (and a sign that I screwed up somewhere), I can satisfy the USE flag requests and the ~amd64

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: The problem seems to be the use of static libraries I temporarily worked around by adding xfce-base/thunar -udev to package.use. Somehow building thunar with udev introduced the mess. Chris

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: Can I see your USE Canek, Thank you for your help. My USE flags are pretty benign. I'm beginning to suspect something is grossly wrong with my setup. Below I will post my USE line from make.conf and my entire

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] # 2012-09-10: appease thunar xfce-base/thunar -udev This makes no sense; the udev flag in thunar only asks for =sys-fs/udev-171, which is stable. Are you sure you don't have anything in

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] # 2012-09-10: appease thunar xfce-base/thunar -udev This makes no sense; the udev flag in thunar only asks for

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xfce-base/thunar: lobotomy needed

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: =sys-fs/udev-171, which is stable. Are you sure you don't have anything in /etc/portage/package.keywords? I know it sounds absurd, but... I have no package.keywords file. My package.use is small and benign. My