Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:48:54 Dale wrote:
The emerge -e world finished. It still doesn't work like it did a few
weeks ago. So, I tried the nonetwork option. That starts about every
service except the GUI, my UPS thingy and a couple others. Get this, it
even
Dale wrote:
I'm going to create a runlevel myself and let it mirror the boot
runlevel. Let's see what that does. I'll post results here shortly.
Dale
:-) :-)
Same thing as nonetwork.
Dale
:-) :-)
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:48:54 Dale wrote:
The emerge -e world finished. It still doesn't work like it did a few
weeks ago. So, I tried the nonetwork option. That starts about every
service except the GUI, my UPS thingy and a couple others. Get this, it
even starts the freaking network.
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 02:48:54 Dale wrote:
The emerge -e world finished. It still doesn't work like it did a few
weeks ago. So, I tried the nonetwork option. That starts about every
service except the GUI, my UPS thingy and a couple others. Get this, it
even starts the freaking
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 02:48:54 Dale wrote:
The emerge -e world finished. It still doesn't work like it did a few
weeks ago. So, I tried the nonetwork option. That starts about every
service except the GUI, my UPS thingy and a couple others. Get this, it
even
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 14:56:59 Dale wrote:
The Mississippi river is flooding on the other side of the state and I'm
dry here on this side. I actually live less than a mile from a different
river. Weather is so weird sometimes. I don't want to think about the
folks North and South of me.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
My setup works just fine with run-levels that I set up years ago. I have one
for no-x, which as well as not starting X also omits services that are only
useful in X. I also use the nonetwork run-level for major emerges such as
wholesale upgrades of KDE.
The only thing I
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
SNIP
everything else just works (well, apart from Flash in web browsers, but that
hardly counts).
--
Rgds
Peter
What about Flash in web browsers is not working for you since updating
to OpenRC? Granted, I run
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:40:02PM +0200, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
SNIP
everything else just works (well, apart from Flash in web browsers, but that
hardly counts).
What about Flash in web browsers is not
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 17:52:22 Indi wrote:
Actually the latest flash update appears to have restored functional
fullscreen video on my old thinkpad T-42. Several versions ago there was
an update that had made it unwatchable in fullscreen.
I've just installed version 10.2.159.1_p201011173.
on 05/18/2011 08:05 PM Peter Humphrey wrote the following:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 17:52:22 Indi wrote:
Actually the latest flash update appears to have restored functional
fullscreen video on my old thinkpad T-42. Several versions ago there was
an update that had made it unwatchable in
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:28:45 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Put rc_hotplug=!net.* into /etc/rc.conf.
The system is getting too clever by half; nowadays it starts whatever
it can, and only then does it look to see what you've set via rc-update.
Openrc defaults to having hotplug disabled
#
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 20:59:59 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:28:45 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Put rc_hotplug=!net.* into /etc/rc.conf.
The system is getting too clever by half; nowadays it starts whatever
it can, and only then does it look to see what you've set via
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:10:02PM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 17:52:22 Indi wrote:
Actually the latest flash update appears to have restored functional
fullscreen video on my old thinkpad T-42. Several versions ago there was
an update that had made it
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 18:22:10 Thanasis wrote:
If it doesn't work, try it with www-client/chromium.
I've already tried chomium, konqueror and opera. No improvement.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Tue, 17 May 2011 06:58:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
I'm beginning to think that openrc goes back to the old Linux way.
In other words, it uses the init levels instead of softlevels.
Yes, this seems to be the case, although not in a clear way (otherwise
why is softlevel=nonetwork working?)
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 06:58:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
I'm beginning to think that openrc goes back to the old Linux way.
In other words, it uses the init levels instead of softlevels.
Yes, this seems to be the case, although not in a clear way (otherwise
why is
Hi Dale,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:20:52AM -0500, Dale wrote:
So do I need to create a runlevel called dalesboot and then just put the
same stuff in it as is in the normal boot level? I have to say, that is
weird. A runlevel should be used by both the system and available to
the user
William Hubbs wrote:
Hi Dale,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:20:52AM -0500, Dale wrote:
So do I need to create a runlevel called dalesboot and then just put the
same stuff in it as is in the normal boot level? I have to say, that is
weird. A runlevel should be used by both the system and
William Hubbs wrote:
Hi Dale,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:20:52AM -0500, Dale wrote:
So do I need to create a runlevel called dalesboot and then just put the
same stuff in it as is in the normal boot level? I have to say, that is
weird. A runlevel should be used by both the system and
On Monday 16 May 2011 02:47:31 Dale wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 20:12, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel=
flag, I simply append
Mick wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011 02:47:31 Dale wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 20:12, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel=
flag, I
On Monday 16 May 2011 13:10:52 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Did you try creating a new runlevel (dale_special) and then booting into
it by appending softlevel=dale_special ?
That will prove if the Gentoo softlevel mechanism is no longer available.
I tried some of the other runlevels,
Hi,
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers. Since I have this in my grub list, I
just select single user and it boots to single user mode. Well, not any
more. This is my current settings:
title Gentoo
kernel
On Sun, 15 May 2011 05:34:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers.
Why not rebuild them before you reboot? It's far more convenient.
--
Neil Bothwick
Where do you think you're going today?
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 05:34:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers.
Why not rebuild them before you reboot? It's far more convenient.
But that doesn't fix the problem I
On Sunday 15 May 2011 11:34:07 Dale wrote:
Hi,
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers. Since I have this in my grub list, I
just select single user and it boots to single user mode. Well, not any
more. This is my current
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk writes:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 05:34:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers.
Why not rebuild them before you reboot? It's far more convenient.
I do not know about the
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 15 May 2011 11:34:07 Dale wrote:
Hi,
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers. Since I have this in my grub list, I
just select single user and it boots to single user mode. Well, not any
more. This is
On Sunday 15 May 2011 16:39:19 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 15 May 2011 11:34:07 Dale wrote:
Hi,
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers. Since I have this in my grub list, I
just select single user and it boots to
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel= flag, I simply
append single at the end of the kernel call and it boots in single user
(root password or ctrl+d to continue).
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 07:34, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I updated my kernel and had to reboot.
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:14 on Sunday 15 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 05:34:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single user
mode and rebuild my video drivers.
Why not rebuild them
On Sun, 15 May 2011 16:36:10 +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
I updated my kernel and had to reboot. I usually boot to single
user mode and rebuild my video drivers.
Why not rebuild them before you reboot? It's far more convenient.
I do not know about the particular video drivers, but
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel= flag, I
simply append single at the end of the kernel call and it boots in
single user (root password or ctrl+d to continue).
May try that next. I don't need this right now but I do want to figure
this out
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel= flag, I
simply append single at the end of the kernel call and it boots in
single user (root password or ctrl+d to continue).
I did get this to work:
title Gentoo single user
kernel
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 20:12, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel= flag, I simply
append single at the end of the kernel call and it boots in single user
(root password or ctrl+d to continue).
I did get this to
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 20:12, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I have a similar entry, but have never used the softlevel=
flag, I simply append single at the end of the kernel call
and it
37 matches
Mail list logo