On 19/09/2021 14:06, Philip Webb wrote:
210919 antlists wrote:
On 19/09/2021 08:03, Philip Webb wrote:
Portage ought to be able to recognise when a set of pkgs
are creating destructive circular dependencies among themselves
& resolve the conflict by updating all of them together.
Until you
On 9/19/21 12:03 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 210918 cal wrote:
>>> (kde-frameworks/kglobalaccel-5.82.0-r1:5/5.82::gentoo, installed)
>>> USE="-debug -doc -nls -test" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by
>>> (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
>> See in particular the last
210919 antlists wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 08:03, Philip Webb wrote:
>> Portage ought to be able to recognise when a set of pkgs
>> are creating destructive circular dependencies among themselves
>> & resolve the conflict by updating all of them together.
> Until you hit my version of the problem,
>
On 19/09/2021 08:03, Philip Webb wrote:
Portage ought to be able to recognise when a set of pkgs
are creating destructive circular dependencies among themselves
& resolve the conflict by updating all of them together.
Until you hit my version of the problem, where if a is not there, b
crashes
210918 cal wrote:
>> (kde-frameworks/kglobalaccel-5.82.0-r1:5/5.82::gentoo, installed)
>> USE="-debug -doc -nls -test" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by
>> (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
> See in particular the last message.
> I'm not sure what causes that
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 17.19.45 CEST Philip Webb wrote:
> Here is the whole command + output in gruesome detail :
>
> root:522 ~> !498
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_9" emerge -pv --backtrack=30 attica
> frameworkintegration kactivities kactivities-stats kcmutils kconfig
> kcoreaddons
cal wrote:
>
> See in particular the last message. I'm not sure what causes that
> message in particular, but it seems like kglobalaccel is causing the
> problem by pulling in a bunch of 5.82.0 deps causing a slot conflict.
>
> cal
>
>
Just a shot in the dark, could some KDE packages have crept
On 9/18/21 2:59 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot
On 9/18/21 8:19 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 210918 Jack wrote:
>> On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
>>> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>>>
>>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot
210918 Jack wrote:
> On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
>> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
>> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>>
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>> pulled
>> !!! into the
On 9/18/21 09:08, Philip Webb wrote:
210918 J.O. Aho wrote:
On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
210918 J.O. Aho wrote:
> On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
>> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
>> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>>
>>!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>> pulled
>>!!! into the
There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
kde-frameworks/kcoreaddons:5
210126 Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 January 2021 07:52:53 GMT Philip Webb wrote:
>> I manhandled a huge update of Qt + KDE last weekend
>> & am now using Qt-5.15.2 Frameworks-5.77.0 Plasma-5.20.5 .
>> The digital clock has disappeared from the panel.
> Some packages have been updated again
On Tuesday, 26 January 2021 07:52:53 GMT Philip Webb wrote:
> I manhandled a huge update of Qt + KDE last weekend
> & am now using Qt-5.15.2 Frameworks-5.77.0 Plasma-5.20.5 .
> It was necessary to unmerge the whole of Qt & remerge it
> & ditto part of Frameworks : otherwise there were
I manhandled a huge update of Qt + KDE last weekend
& am now using Qt-5.15.2 Frameworks-5.77.0 Plasma-5.20.5 .
It was necessary to unmerge the whole of Qt & remerge it
& ditto part of Frameworks : otherwise there were dependency conflicts.
Portage seems incapable of handling such situations by
I updated my PC today, and there was a lot of KDE-related packages being
updated.
As part of my usual update procedure I depclean'ed and ran
revdep-rebuild.sh - and it wants to rebuild every single package on my
system? Surely that has to be some kind of mistake?
Anyone have any insight?
Dan
- Mail Original -
De: Alain DIDIERJEAN alain.didierj...@free.fr
À: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Envoyé: Lundi 30 Mai 2011 18h45:17 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome
/ Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: [gentoo-user] kde update
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
A simple emerge -uD
On 2 June 2011 15:32, Alain DIDIERJEAN alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
- Mail Original -
De: Alain DIDIERJEAN alain.didierj...@free.fr
[snip...]
Hope I can get some help
- Mail Original - ends here
SOLVED, after unmerging then re-emerging a little more than 300 packages.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge
the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like that.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge
the new version
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Trying to update from
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system
packages being removed. It may be
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:00 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht
did
opine thusly:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Nils Larsson wrote:
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system
packages
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did
opine thusly:
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did
opine thusly:
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
It appears I was wrong after all.
Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order.
Sorry Dale.
No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be
100F tomorrow.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
It appears I was wrong after all.
Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order.
Sorry Dale.
No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:35 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did
opine
thusly:
It appears I was wrong after all.
Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 00:30:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
And what's that gigantic gate over the river behind you in the profile
pic? Looks a bit like the sea wall gates on the Thames.
A good deal less elegant though :)
--
Rgds
Peter
Alan McKinnon wrote:
So that's what you look like :-) I had a ... very different ... mental
picture (also a complete fiction).
There's no public photos on your page though :-(
And what's that gigantic gate over the river behind you in the profile pic?
Looks a bit like the sea wall gates on
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
A simple emerge -uD world gives:
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.7.2-r1 [4.6.3-r1] USE=-jit%
-private-headers%
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.7.2 [4.6.3-r2]
[blocks b ] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.7.2 (x11-libs/qt-sql-4.7.2 is blocking
On Monday 30 May 2011 17:45:17 Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote:
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
A simple emerge -uD world gives:
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.7.2-r1 [4.6.3-r1] USE=-jit%
-private-headers% [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.7.2 [4.6.3-r2]
[blocks b ]
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
Don't panic! What I did was to progressively uninstall the blockers
and then run emerge -uaDv world. Eventually there were no blockers,
the latest qt was installed and then kde4.6.
If the blockers are marked with a lower case b, portage will
On Monday 30 May 2011 20:02:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
Don't panic! What I did was to progressively uninstall the blockers
and then run emerge -uaDv world. Eventually there were no blockers,
the latest qt was installed and then kde4.6.
If
Mick wrote:
On Monday 30 May 2011 20:02:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
Don't panic! What I did was to progressively uninstall the blockers
and then run emerge -uaDv world. Eventually there were no blockers,
the latest qt was installed and
38 matches
Mail list logo
