Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-29 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: For me, libdri.so is a symlink to /usr/lib64/opengl/ati/extensions/libdri.so libglx.so is a symlink to /usr/lib64/opengl/ati/extensions/libglx.so (since you havent run the eselect to repoint it yet, it will be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-27 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: DRI requires kernel support - Device Drivers - Graphics - Direct Rendering Manager, and you'll want to select the correct ATI support under

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-27 Thread Adam Carter
For me, libdri.so is a symlink to /usr/lib64/opengl/ati/extensions/libdri.so libglx.so is a symlink to /usr/lib64/opengl/ati/extensions/libglx.so (since you havent run the eselect to repoint it yet, it will be set to /usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libglx.so). Can you tell me

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-27 Thread Adam Carter
Sorry Kevin, I wasn't paying attention and thought you were using ati-drivers/flgrx package, which is where /usr/lib64/opengl/ati comes from. Since you're not using flgrx I would expect you would use /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so and That was supposed to be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-26 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Re: glx, what happens if you run 'eselect opengl list'? there are two listed, ati and xorg-x11.  xorg-x11 is selected. That means you have not removed ati-drivers.  It might be they interfere

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-26 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: DRI requires kernel support - Device Drivers - Graphics - Direct Rendering Manager, and you'll want to select the correct ATI support under that. That's always been there, as modules.  If I modprobe for r128, it

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Adam Carter
RESULTS: fglrx loads, but does not see the adapter. There's also a problem with the mouse driver -- some undefined symbol. Have you rebuilt your kernel after emergeing xf86-input-mouse? If so you probably need to re-emerge xf86-input-mouse.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: RESULTS: fglrx loads, but does not see the adapter.  There's also a problem with the mouse driver -- some undefined symbol. Have you rebuilt your kernel after emergeing xf86-input-mouse? If so you probably need to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Mick
On Monday 25 May 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: In make.config, I changed to VIDEO_CARDS=r128 vga fbdev vesa and recompiled xorg-server. [snip...] Now when I try startx it still has problems, but I appear to be closer. On screen I see [snip...] (EE) Failed to load module ati (module does

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Kevin O'Gorman wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: RESULTS: fglrx loads, but does not see the adapter.  There's also a problem with the mouse driver -- some undefined

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Adam Carter
This seems a step backwards. No screens found, and still 3 things that would not load. Results follow: === startx run begins xauth: creating new authority file /root/.serverauth.21944 X.Org X Server 1.5.3 Release Date: 5 November 2008 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: This seems a step backwards.  No screens found, and still 3 things that would not load.  Results follow: === startx run begins xauth:  creating new authority file /root/.serverauth.21944 X.Org X Server

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-25 Thread Adam Carter
DRI requires kernel support - Device Drivers - Graphics - Direct Rendering Manager, and you'll want to select the correct ATI support under that. That's always been there, as modules. If I modprobe for r128, it gets loaded along with module drm. It makes no difference to the startx

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-24 Thread David Relson
Hi Kevin, This morning I'm experimenting with xorg.conf (with kernels 2.6.28-r5 and 2.6.29-r4 and with ati-drivers-8.552-r2) and have seen a variety of problems. One detail I've noted is that files in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers matching *.so seem to be auto-loaded as X starts up. If you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: David Relson wrote: On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:57:32 -0700 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Summary: X is hosed. A couple of weeks back, I made the transition to the current versions of xorg-server and ati-drivers, i.e. the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-23 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: David Relson wrote: On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:57:32 -0700 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Summary: X is hosed. A couple of weeks back, I made the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-23 Thread David Relson
On Sun, 24 May 2009 01:22:06 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: ...[snip]... ### Begin xorg.conf ### Section ServerFlags Option AllowEmptyInput false EndSection Section Files FontPath /usr/share/fonts/util FontPath /usr/share/fonts/encodings

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict

2009-05-23 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag 24 Mai 2009, David Relson wrote: On Sun, 24 May 2009 01:22:06 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: ...[snip]... ### Begin xorg.conf ### Section ServerFlags Option AllowEmptyInput false EndSection Section Files FontPath /usr/share/fonts/util