Stevan may well be right that the repository of the U of Liege (ORBi) contains
3,620 chemistry papers. But apart from posters, most deposits of articles
published in peer-reviewed journals, and even theses, are marked restricted
access and not accessible to me, and 'libre' access seems
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.ukwrote:
Sorry, part of my reply was about VCs below, not chemists! My reply about
chemists should have been this:
It is not chemists that oppose self-archiving,
it's their publishers! (I've long predicted that as publishers
Le 13 juil. 2012 à 09:32, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk a écrit :
What is the percentage of full-text ACS papers pubished by Liege which are
visible at time of publication?
None, of course!
Just ask for an e-print when you are in thé ORBi web site and we'll send it at
once. It's Green,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Jan Velterop velte...@gmail.com wrote:
Stevan may well be right that the repository of the U of Liege (ORBi)
contains 3,620 chemistry papers. But apart from posters, most deposits of
If ever one needed an argument in favour of 'gold' OA, here it is.
Jan
On 13 Jul 2012, at 09:48, brent...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
Le 13 juil. 2012 à 09:32, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk a écrit :
What is the percentage of full-text ACS papers pubished by Liege which are
visible at time
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM, brent...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
Thanks for answering
Le 13 juil. 2012 à 09:32, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk a écrit :
What is the percentage of full-text ACS papers pubished by Liege which
are visible at time of publication?
None, of course!
And that's
Peter
These 1059 articles were deposited via the ACS open choice option.
There will be other ACS papers, funded by NIH authors, which are in PMC but
were not routed through the open choice route. These papers will be made
available after 12 months, and will not have re-use permissions. These
So really, the only true deposited open access articles are published as
'gold'. At least that is the impression I get from this exchange.
Jan
On 13 Jul 2012, at 10:19, Kiley, Robert wrote:
Peter
These 1059 articles were deposited via the ACS “open choice” option.
There will be other
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Kiley, Robert r.ki...@wellcome.ac.ukwrote:
Peter
** **
These 1059 articles were deposited via the ACS “open choice” option.
Thanks - This is (I believe) hybrid Gold - author pays for MS to be Open
in some definition of the term (but not yet CC-BY)
In order to remove ambiguity from the discussion, I think we should make clear
that:
1) it is about Open Access, not about deposit in repositories per se (though
such deposit can well be one of the routes to open access as already
established in Budapest over a decade ago)
2) any repositories
FOR THE PERPLEXED GOAL READER:
For the perplexed reader who is wondering what on earth all this to and fro
on GOAL is about:
1. Gratis Open Access (OA) means free online access to peer-reviewed
journal articles.
2. Libre OA means free online access to peer-reviewed journal articles +
certain
Greetings. I get the sense that Google Scholar is becoming the default indexer
for open access research in STM with slower but also increasing uptake in the
SS and humanities. Google is so nearly ubiquitous now it is easy to forget they
are also a commercial company. At some point, a
I agree with Jan in the part of his intervention that I kept below. I
should have said that researchers, in looking for literature, should
find themselves naturally and quickly led to repositories (and OA
journals). That is where the real OA advantage would begin to show up.
We are far from this.
It is easy to forget that they are a commercial company and not an official
part of the web architecture. However, they are only a commercial company, and
just one of the myriad web indexers that account for about 50% of the visits to
any OA repository.
They have contributed significant public
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Alma Swan a.s...@talk21.com wrote:
Yes, EOS is on board.
--
*From:* Jean-Claude Guédon jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca
*To:* goal@eprints.org
*Sent:* Friday, 13 July 2012, 15:19
*Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Reaching for the Reachable
15 matches
Mail list logo