On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Kiley, Robert r.ki...@wellcome.ac.ukwrote:
I keep hearing this claim that “60% of journals allow immediate,
unembargoed, self-archiving” and wonder how accurate this.
Although I’m aware of the original source of this
Is there an easy way (easier than searching title-by-title through
SHERPA/RoMEO) to get a complete list of journals offering Green access with no
embargo? I can't speak for the marketplace as a whole, but my library will
cancel most if not all of our subscriptions to any such journals — my
Rick
I don't know if there is a way of getting a list, but I think you are
conflating two things. I assume you are saying you would cancel if all of the
content of the journal was available without embargo. Sherpa/Romeo doesn't
tell you that - it just tells you whether or not the publisher
I'm on it !!
Graham
H: +44 (0)141 422 1483 (after 18.00 GMT)
C: +44 (0)7900441046
E: steelgrah...@gmail.com
Fav: http://www.plos.org - research made public
Fb: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=709026752
Blog: http://mcblawg.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/McDawg
Rick, in terms of subscription cancellations is that really true with big
deals? Doesn't Elsevier allow immediate deposit with most of their
journals except if your institution has a mandate. Also I believe Björk
and his colleagues found faculty often take awhile getting around to
archiving
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rick Anderson rick.ander...@utah.eduwrote:
if I know that a publisher allows green deposit of all articles without
embargo, then the likelihood that we'll maintain a paid subscription drops
dramatically
Rick Anderson has made a public announcement that he
Would you really consider dropping a journal with say 70% percent of the
content available after a year? I'm not a librarian but I just wonder how much
of a difference allowing immediate archiving of the accepted version really
makes in subscription decisions.
It depends. Obviously, a
); Friend, Fred; LibLicense-L
Discussion Forum; SPARC Open Access Forum
Subject: [GOAL] Re: [sparc-oaforum] Re: Disruption vs. Protection
Would you really consider dropping a journal with say 70% percent of the
content available after a year? I'm not a librarian but I just wonder how much
, 17 September 2013 2:15 AM
To: David Solomon
Cc: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci); Friend, Fred; LibLicense-L
Discussion Forum; SPARC Open Access Forum
Subject: [GOAL] Re: [sparc-oaforum] Re: Disruption vs. Protection
Would you really consider dropping a journal with say 70% percent
