Hello Japhar-Team,
the last time I was on your side it was of the end of 1998.
Wow, I have seen, that you now supported Unix AND Win32.
But there are some points, that I find not so good:
Why is there so an unkind Download-Side ? There is no
description of the files. To know, that
Why is there so an unkind Download-Side ? There is no description of
the files. To know, that archive-0425=0517.tar.gz is an old
E-Mail-list, you must first download it.
Well, it is custom that the distribution is name-version-tar.gz.
Everything else is just extra, and can be ignored. I've
Personally, although I'm not on the Japhar dev. team, I think the LGPL affords
you plenty of freedom to work with the library. LGPL explicitly allows code
(I.E. JNI stuff) to be linked against Japhar without being also free, so all
commercial Java stuff can eventually work under it.
[Uncle George]
Do u holks have JAVA tests u use to check out ur ver of java ?
gat
You seem to have serious problems with your keyboard. You should have
it checked or replaced.
Yes, we include some regression tests in testsuite/. If you want a
more complete collection, have a look at Mauve,
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:23:02 Godmar Back wrote:
In the case of JVMs, the difference between LGPL and GPL comes in when you
look at embedding the VM itself as a library in a proprietary product. This
is possible with Japhar, but not with Kaffe.
This sounds reasonable. I am curious about
Godmar Back wrote:
Personally, although I'm not on the Japhar dev. team, I think the LGPL affords
you plenty of freedom to work with the library. LGPL explicitly allows code
(I.E. JNI stuff) to be linked against Japhar without being also free, so all
commercial Java stuff can
