Hi,
Same question again. I noticed that a new release of JMeter is now out and
does not include this contribution. Seb do you have any idea if you plan to
integrate it and when?
Regards
Guillaume Lasnier * Software Engineer * SunGard * Decalog * 147 Bureaux de
la Colline, Bâtiment E * 92213
I have just had a very quick look at the patch.
It's not immediately clear if it can be added to the JMeter code-base,
as there seem to be changes to quite a few utility classes. The
changes may be upwards-compatible, but I cannot tell at present.
There seem to be several irrelevant changes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41704.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41704.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi
My code is now submitted to bugzilla as #41707. Looking forward to hear your
reactions/comments ...
/Jesper
From: sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: JMeter Developers List jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org
To: JMeter Developers List jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: HTTP Proxy with
Thanks.
Just wondering why the query string needs to be compared against a schema?
If the content starts with ?xml surely this means that the string
should not be parsed into name/value pairs?
Or am I missing something here?
Unless the DOM parsing is needed, it would obviously be a lot
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41704.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've just had a more detailed look at the patch file, and it contains
lots of irrelevant/unnecessary changes.
I'm afraid the patches cannot be applied as they stand - there's far
too much work involved.
I suggest you attach the new files as files, rather than patches (zip
them up as there are
Author: sebb
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:28:57 2007
New Revision: 512075
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=512075
Log:
Update to htmlparser 2.0
Added:
jakarta/jmeter/branches/rel-2-2/LICENSE(htmlparser).txt
jakarta/jmeter/branches/rel-2-2/lib/htmllexer-2.0-20060923.jar (with
Author: sebb
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:47:20 2007
New Revision: 512080
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=512080
Log:
Update to htmlparser 2.0
Removed:
jakarta/jmeter/branches/rel-2-2/src/htmlparser16/
-
To
Author: sebb
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:48:09 2007
New Revision: 512081
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=512081
Log:
Update to htmlparser 2.0
Modified:
jakarta/jmeter/branches/rel-2-2/lib/ (props changed)
Propchange: jakarta/jmeter/branches/rel-2-2/lib/
Hi
Thanks for your comments. My reason for validating the xml against the
schema is only to be sure that it is an xml-rpc call and not just some xml
being posted. The alternative is to call the feature isXmlData, not
isXmlRpc, and then skip the parsing and schema checking?
Also, i will fix
20 matches
Mail list logo