Hi Mike.
Forwarding this to Roman Zippel which is the kconfig maintainer.
The intent with this is clear but the solution you suggest albeit simple
does not really match where we could end up with kconfig.
Recently Roman added support for options in the kconfig language
and I would assume we
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
The intent with this is clear but the solution you suggest albeit simple
does not really match where we could end up with kconfig.
Recently Roman added support for options in the kconfig language
and I would assume we could deal with most of this
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:23:40AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
The intent with this is clear but the solution you suggest albeit simple
does not really match where we could end up with kconfig.
Recently Roman added support for options in the
Hello all!
Sorry to jump into the discussion, but...
On Thursday 24 May 2007 08:40, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
The intent with this is clear but the solution you suggest albeit simple
does not really match where we could end up with kconfig.
Recently Roman added support for options in the kconfig
lovely ... looks like Darwin fails at life when it comes to respecting
POSIX and open() with O_TRUNC and a 0 byte file ... in particular,
this statement:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/open.html
If O_TRUNC is set and the file did previously exist, upon successful
