* Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:08:54 +0200
From: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The sed expression used at the moment in scripts/Makefile.headersinst
relies on the (handy) GNU extension where you can escape ERE's in an
otherwise BRE without using the GNU -r option. The following patch
On 7/21/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:08:54 +0200
From: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The sed expression used at the moment in scripts/Makefile.headersinst
relies on the (handy) GNU extension where you can escape ERE's in an
otherwise BRE
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ -e
s/[[:space:]]__user[[:space:]]\{1,\}
substitute one or more ' __user '
Substitute ' __user' followed by one or more ' '. \{\} applies only to
the last RE atom.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:21:43PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 7/21/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:27:31AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
sections in header files. We know how obfuscated C can be, and this also
applies to
On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would much more prefer this functionality to be integrated into unifdef.
There is no good reason to have two different
On 7/21/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:39:16PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:21:43PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
while you could try and make a claim against memory/cpu effeciency, i
fail to see how the first or last claims
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:13:26AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
sections in header files. We
