Re: [kbuild-devel] Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch

2007-06-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:19:56PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Oleg Verych wrote: Because of that, i think, following is redundant: - to check for binary files find . -type f | xargs cleanfile What about patches? Anyway, by agreement (with myself), i've stopped on having

Re: [kbuild-devel] Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch (Re: [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines)

2007-06-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:45:56PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: While i'm against whitespace damaged files or patches since my very first patch, and don't like brain damaged programmer's tools called text editors, i also want to encourage UNIX-way of using userspace. Of course, i might be wrong

Re: [kbuild-devel] Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch

2007-06-06 Thread Oleg Verych
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:50:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: [] Many things in XXI century still can be done by tools founded 20-30 years ago. Why not try to? Because your shell script is unreadable by normal human beings[*] while the perl script for people with a bit of perl fu can read