On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:22 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday, May 11, 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote:
Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the
traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for
applications and users to a large and
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:52 +0200, todd rme wrote:
...
One question I think might be worth asking is what (if anything) is
kio missing? We have applications that do device or file access,
such as ark and k3b, that are not using kio slaves for that access.
Why not? Is it just a lack of time,
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
I now prepared the required repositories:
scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio
contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs.
The facets are quite weird and I am not sure about releasing them again.
The ui stuff -
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs.
The facets
On 05/16/2012 08:37 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch
might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing.
If you do not I would appreciate a look over my branch to check if I
missed sth.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch
might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing.
If you do not I would
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch
might at
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to
On 05/16/2012 09:52 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104934/#review13901
---
Time is running: soft-message-freeze is tomorrow. I am going
Hi,
in preparation of the migration of kdesk to git I found that scheck in
kdesdk is currently excluded from the build, because it has been never
completely ported to Qt4/KDE4. And it seems noone has missed it for 4 years,
perhaps accel conflicts Co. are no longer a big problem?
Thus I will
13 matches
Mail list logo
