Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

2017-06-19 Thread Herbert Xu 
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:52:54AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King 
> 
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 

Patch applied.  Thanks.
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu 
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

2017-06-13 Thread Joe Perches 
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:40 +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 13/06/17 11:36, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King 
> > > 
> > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
> > Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
> > good thing to change possibly API dependent output
> > in seq_ calls?
> Considering it's in -next and has not landed in upstream I supposed it
> was better to fix it now before it landed in Linus' repo.

Good call, thanks.

> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c 
> > > b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
> > 
> > []
> > > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > >   struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
> > >  
> > >   seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
> > > - seq_printf(s, "  Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > > + seq_printf(s, "  Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > >   seq_printf(s, "  Cores [AE: %u  SE: %u]\n",
> > >  ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
> > >   seq_printf(s, "  Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);

Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

2017-06-13 Thread Colin Ian King 
On 13/06/17 11:36, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King 
>>
>> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
> 
> Hey Colin.
> 
> Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
> good thing to change possibly API dependent output
> in seq_ calls?

Considering it's in -next and has not landed in upstream I supposed it
was better to fix it now before it landed in Linus' repo.

Colin

> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c 
>> b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
> []
>> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>>  struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
>>  
>>  seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
>> -seq_printf(s, "  Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
>> +seq_printf(s, "  Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
>>  seq_printf(s, "  Cores [AE: %u  SE: %u]\n",
>> ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
>>  seq_printf(s, "  Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

2017-06-13 Thread Joe Perches 
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King 
> 
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message

Hey Colin.

Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
good thing to change possibly API dependent output
in seq_ calls?

> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c 
> b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
[]
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>   struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
>  
>   seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
> - seq_printf(s, "  Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> + seq_printf(s, "  Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
>   seq_printf(s, "  Cores [AE: %u  SE: %u]\n",
>  ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
>   seq_printf(s, "  Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);

[PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

2017-06-13 Thread Colin King 
From: Colin Ian King 

Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
---
 drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c 
b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
index eee6fb501580..ae44a464cd2d 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
 
seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
-   seq_printf(s, "  Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
+   seq_printf(s, "  Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
seq_printf(s, "  Cores [AE: %u  SE: %u]\n",
   ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
seq_printf(s, "  Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);
-- 
2.11.0