Re: [PATCH 1/4] crypto: s5p-sss - Close possible race for completed requests

2017-03-17 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Friday, March 17, 2017 04:49:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Driver is capable of handling only one request at a time and it stores
> it in its state container struct s5p_aes_dev.  This stored request must be
> protected between concurrent invocations (e.g. completing current
> request and scheduling new one).  Combination of lock and "busy" field
> is used for that purpose.
> 
> When "busy" field is true, the driver will not accept new request thus
> it will not overwrite currently handled data.
> 
> However commit 28b62b145868 ("crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion
> on LRW(AES)") moved some of the write to "busy" field out of a lock
> protected critical section.  This might lead to potential race between
> completing current request and scheduling a new one.  Effectively the
> request completion might try to operate on new crypto request.
> 
> Cc:  # v4.10.x
> Fixes: 28b62b145868 ("crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion on LRW(AES)")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics



[PATCH 1/4] crypto: s5p-sss - Close possible race for completed requests

2017-03-17 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
Driver is capable of handling only one request at a time and it stores
it in its state container struct s5p_aes_dev.  This stored request must be
protected between concurrent invocations (e.g. completing current
request and scheduling new one).  Combination of lock and "busy" field
is used for that purpose.

When "busy" field is true, the driver will not accept new request thus
it will not overwrite currently handled data.

However commit 28b62b145868 ("crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion
on LRW(AES)") moved some of the write to "busy" field out of a lock
protected critical section.  This might lead to potential race between
completing current request and scheduling a new one.  Effectively the
request completion might try to operate on new crypto request.

Cc:  # v4.10.x
Fixes: 28b62b145868 ("crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion on LRW(AES)")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
---
 drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
index 1b9da3dc799b..6c620487e9c2 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
@@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ static void s5p_sg_done(struct s5p_aes_dev *dev)
 static void s5p_aes_complete(struct s5p_aes_dev *dev, int err)
 {
dev->req->base.complete(>req->base, err);
-   dev->busy = false;
 }
 
 static void s5p_unset_outdata(struct s5p_aes_dev *dev)
@@ -462,7 +461,7 @@ static irqreturn_t s5p_aes_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
 
s5p_aes_complete(dev, 0);
-   dev->busy = true;
+   /* Device is still busy */
tasklet_schedule(>tasklet);
} else {
/*
@@ -483,6 +482,7 @@ static irqreturn_t s5p_aes_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 
 error:
s5p_sg_done(dev);
+   dev->busy = false;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
s5p_aes_complete(dev, err);
 
@@ -634,6 +634,7 @@ static void s5p_aes_crypt_start(struct s5p_aes_dev *dev, 
unsigned long mode)
 
 indata_error:
s5p_sg_done(dev);
+   dev->busy = false;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(>lock, flags);
s5p_aes_complete(dev, err);
 }
-- 
2.9.3