Am Freitag, 21. April 2017, 09:57:56 BRT schrieb Mimi Zohar:
> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:40 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > @@ -949,49 +936,16 @@ void ima_policy_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >
> > #define pt(token) policy_tokens[token + Opt_err].pattern
> > #define mt(token)
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:40 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2017, 08:13:23 BRT schrieb Mimi Zohar:
> > On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 17:17 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > If the func_tokens array uses the same indices as enum ima_hooks,
> > > policy_func_show can
Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2017, 08:13:23 BRT schrieb Mimi Zohar:
> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 17:17 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > If the func_tokens array uses the same indices as enum ima_hooks,
> > policy_func_show can be a lot simpler, and the func_* enum becomes
> > unnecessary.
>
> My
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 17:17 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> If the func_tokens array uses the same indices as enum ima_hooks,
> policy_func_show can be a lot simpler, and the func_* enum becomes
> unnecessary.
My main concern with separating the enumeration from the string
definition is
