On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:56 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:34PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Even though memory addresses are unsigned. The operands used to compute the
>
> ... unsigned, the operands ...
Oops! I will correct.
--
To
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 12:03 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > + * If mod is 0 and register R/EBP (regno=5) is
> indicated in the
> > + * base part of the SIB byte, the value of such
> register should
> > + * not be used in the address computation. Also, a
>
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 00:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:36PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when a SIB byte is used and the
> > base of the SIB byte
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:45PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> The 32-bit and 64-bit address encodings are identical. This means that we
> can use the same function in both cases. In order to reuse the function for
> 32-bit address encodings, we must sign-extend our 32-bit signed operands to
>
