Re: [Mav-user] How to suppress Velocity Transforms?

2003-08-25 Thread Doug Kirk
I think that's a Velocity thing and not a Maverick thing. Try this in your template: $response.setContentType('text/plain') -dk On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 03:49 PM, Dan Finkelstein wrote: Hi -- I know this is a really dumb question, esp considering that I've been using and relying on

Re: [Mav-user] Default page like index.m

2003-09-13 Thread Doug Kirk
Hmmm. I have the following in my web.xml and it works just fine: welcome-file-list welcome-fileindex.vm/welcome-file /welcome-file-list *.vm is mapped to the VelocityLayoutServlet in my webapp's web.xml. I would expect a specification of 'index.m' to work as well, since it's just running the

Re: [Mav-user] Eclipse, log4j, etc.

2004-02-09 Thread Doug Kirk
AFAICS, Tomcat (at least 4.1.18) has its own commons-beanutils.jar in its server/lib. It could conflict with the one you added to Tomcat classpath. The jars in Tomcat's server/lib directory are not visible from webapps. However, the jars in common/lib and shared/lib are.

Re: [Mav-user] Eclipse, log4j, etc.

2004-02-10 Thread Doug Kirk
The problem may not be directly with the BeanUtils class, but rather a class it imports. For all of our installations, we have the following commons jars in every webapp's WEB-INF/lib directory: commons-beanutils commons-collections commons-lang commons-logging Actually, that's a bit of a

Re: [Mav-user] a new view

2004-08-27 Thread Doug Kirk
Hmmm...I don't want to rain on any parades, but I'm just wondering why you didn't want to use Velocity, as it accomplishes the same thing and it's already written and well-supported? --doug --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic

Re: [Mav-user] Multiple conditional ${wrapped}?

2004-09-01 Thread Doug Kirk
Indeed, the solution presented below is best, because then the browser will just cache the entire .js file. However, I've had problems using the XML shortcut for empty tags in this particular case, so always do script src=.../script Cheers, doug On Sep 1, 2004, at 4:49 PM, jim moore wrote: Why