Re: [Mav-user] Maverick to Struts

2002-04-25 Thread Ed Ward
of the view mechanism. Ed. - Original Message - From: Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ed Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:36 AM Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Maverick to Struts The question is, which part? I can identify three discrete pieces of an MVC

Re: [Mav-user] Re: Unit Testing Maverick

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Ward
Jeff, why wouldn't you consider using JUnitEE for this? Ed. - Original Message - From: Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Holt, Jack C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:20 AM Subject: [Mav-user] Re: Unit Testing Maverick I don't know

Re: [Mav-user] Re: Unit Testing Maverick

2002-11-07 Thread Ed Ward
controllers so it's not something I'd thought about. (The fact I hadn't needed to test any should have been a big clue. :-]) Ed. - Original Message - From: Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:34 PM Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Re: Unit Testing

[Mav-user] relative paths under Maverick...

2003-10-06 Thread Ed Thompson
I started playing wqith maverick under windows 98. When I first wrote the web app (pre-Maverick)with the following directory struture: root/ |---jsp/ |---images/ |---styles/ I referenced the images from my jsp (under the jsp directory) like this: ../images/imagename.gif When I refactored the

Re: [Mav-user] relative paths under Maverick...

2003-10-06 Thread Ed Thompson
Tried this and discovered the path problem was not with the JSP, but with the style sheet referncing a backgroups image: I have tried background-image : url(../images/orange2.gif); which works in windows but now linux. background-image : url(images/orange2.gif); works in

Re: [Mav-user] relative paths under Maverick...

2003-10-07 Thread Ed Thompson
OK, I am embarrassed - the issue was: on win98 the background image existed, on linux it did not. I forgot to check it not CVS! All is well now, thanx for the advice on relative paths, etc... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek

[Mav-user] MVC Design question

2003-10-15 Thread Ed Thompson
I hope I am not abusing this list by asking a design question... In a typical web app using MVC design (in this case Maverick) is it reasonable that each page with dynamic content has its own command mapping (and associated class)? As I refactor my app using Maverick, I am finding my library

Re: [Mav-user] MVC Design question

2003-10-16 Thread Ed Thompson
Aapo Laakkonen wrote: For consolidating and using separate code paths with maverick you can use controller parameters. Is there an example of the Java the retrives (or recieves) the param? Not sure how the param is passed to the controller...

[Mav-user] Are there any docs on FormProc yet? Examples?

2004-01-18 Thread Ed Thompson
Looking for some reading material... --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.

Re: [Mav-user] Eclipse, log4j, etc.

2004-02-08 Thread Ed Thompson
I have the following in my web.xml: servlet servlet-namelog4j-init/servlet-name servlet-classorg.ed4becky.mComics.Log4jInit/servlet-class init-param param-namelog4j-init-file/param-name param-valueWEB-INF/log4j.properties/param-value /init-param

Re: [Mav-user] A little model help...

2004-02-28 Thread Ed Thompson
Thanx for the help! --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click [INVALID

[Mav-user] opt-freemarker

2004-07-21 Thread Ed Ward
created when the view configuration is loaded. Could you committers have a look at the updates please and let me know what you think? opt-freemarker is currently dependent on them. many thanks, Ed Ward PS. If you'd like to look at the opt-freemarker package, I've placed a copy at http

Re: [Mav-user] opt-freemarker

2004-08-03 Thread Ed Ward
Hi Eelco, I appreciate you're busy at the moment but have you found time to look at the updates to DocumentView? Ed - Original Message - From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:27 PM Subject: RE: [Mav-user] opt-freemarker Sounds

Re: [Mav-user] opt-freemarker

2004-08-10 Thread Ed Ward
and get some feedback from some real FreeMarker users ;-) Your summary of the patch was spot on. As a result of it the DispatchedViewFactory class is no longer required and can be removed. I also noticed that the javadoc for DocumentView needs updating since it still mentions DispatchedView. Ed