I recently had reason to develop a new view type for Maverick, and
wonder if there might be any interest in it. If so, perhaps I can
contribute it back to the project.
The problem: I needed a very simple X?HTML template system. It had to
be something that, however, complicated under the hood,
Doug Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm...I don't want to rain on any parades, but I'm just wondering why
you didn't want to use Velocity, as it accomplishes the same thing and
it's already written and well-supported?
I do use Velocity, and am happy with it in the contexts in which I
use it.
I recently had reason to develop a new view type for Maverick, and
wonder if there might be any interest in it. If so, perhaps I can
contribute it back to the project.
The problem: I needed a very simple X?HTML template system. It had to
be something that, however, complicated under the hood,
Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Velocity produces text that must be parsed to perform XSLT transforms.
This new approach starts immediately with SAX events. Unlike a
hypothetical saxify, it doesn't require fully navigating the source
object graph. Cool.
yes, I think so too. in
