RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality comparison [quite detailed - sorry if repeat]

2000-04-19 Thread Alex Broadhead
Howdy All, I recently finished completely overhauling the ISO 'dist10' LSF decoder to extract a layer-III only player for work. In the process, I discovered a few bugs/inconsistencies in/between the 'dist10' distribution and ISO/IEC 11172-3 and 13818-3. I don't know if they would account for

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality comparison [quite detailed - so rry if repeat]

2000-04-19 Thread Alex Broadhead
Thanks for the summary, Mark. I forgot to mention the 330/332 bug, which I had independently located and saw discussed here earlier. I looked at the ISO code for the Huffman quadruples, and it looks OK. There is very little scfsi related code, and it looks OK, though I don't think I've ever

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] mpglib bugfix

2000-04-24 Thread Alex Broadhead
Howdy All, -Original Message- From: Zia Mazhar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 3:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mpglib bugfix Naoki Shibata wrote: ... I made a patch to fix some problems of mpglib. And, I updated in_mpg123

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3Enc upsampling /buffer

2000-05-01 Thread Alex Broadhead
AM to burn these days... I'm sure every decoder should decode (and play music) rather then locate incompliances in bitstream. 1 KB is not a cost. Amen. ... Maybe Alex Broadhead could comment on if the decoder he just wrote could handle this? Sorry, I was off for a few days

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3Enc upsampling /buffer

2000-05-02 Thread Alex Broadhead
Howdy Mark, -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 10:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3Enc upsampling /buffer ... I should note, BTW, that the ISO 'dist10' package uses a

[MP3 ENCODER] MP3Enc upsampling /buffer

2000-05-05 Thread Alex Broadhead
Try two - I'm guessing the first one bounced due to the excess of LOVE on the net... Howdy Mark, -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 10:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3Enc

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Difference between 8 and 16 bit quality

2000-07-11 Thread Alex Broadhead
Howdy Twinkles, What is the real difference between 8 and 16 bit audio at the same sampling frequency? According to the standard approximations of the statistical formulation (which allows ~6dB/bit) - about 48 dB of SNR... If this means nothing to you, then consider that even basic

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ...

2000-07-11 Thread Alex Broadhead
Howdy, I'll third (or fourth or whatever) this as well, though with a few caveats... I really have to second this. A pair of $2000 floor standing speakers can't compete with the flatness of a good pair of headphones (due to room modes if nothing else). Well, yes and no. I rely strongly

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] hopefully not off topic

2000-07-18 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy J, I am looking for a way to capture both audio and video, synchronize them, and multicast the resulting stream. The receivers must run on windows platforms as well as Linux. The encoder must run on Linux. Not to clutter this list up with commercial chatter or anything, but this is

[MP3 ENCODER] Voice encoding questions

2000-08-04 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy All, In testing my (comparatively naive) hack of the dist10 encoder, I have discovered that, while it does OK for music, it has real problems with speech signals. (Caveat: at our lowest overall bitrate of 300kbps for combined video/audio, we run the audio at 32kbit mono - though we go

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Voice encoding questions

2000-08-04 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy All, Thanks for the quick replies! Gabriel Bouvigne wrote: If you want to encode voice signals, I'd suggest you to use --voice or --preset voice Actually, I want to encode general signals (mostly TV and movies), many of which have significant voice components, and, unfortunately, many

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] CRC on MP3

2000-08-16 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy, I'd like to know where to find some sources or specifications on the CRC used on MP3 frames. I know I could get it in the lame sources, but I'd like to know first if it's fully compliant ! The polynomial used for CRC on all layers of MPEG audio is given on p.30 of ISO/IEC 11172-3:

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] the -mx mode - different philosophy [off topic]

2000-08-22 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Gabriel, First, please note that it has been a long time I didn't really looked inside of the Lame code, so I'll perhaps tell a few wrong statements. (btw, please could anyone explain me when to use the word "tell" and when "say"?) Hmmm... That's actually kind of tricky. Neither is

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decoder compliance

2000-08-22 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy, :: My purpose was to measure the computational accuracy of audio decoders in the :: manner described by ISO/IEC 11172-4. :: The result is a ISO/IEC 11172-4 compliant decoder. It's not so much better than a ISO 9001 certificate. A decoder with a bug fails the test. But not vice

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder

2000-08-28 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Patrick, Would you recommend me to use the dist10 decoder as a basis for a further implementations ? Pretty much everyone does, so come on in, the water's fine... (You don't really have much choice - there are bugs in the spec which can only be fixed (readily) by looking at the dist10

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] lame source C++ compatible?

2000-09-05 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy, How to compile lame on a system where only a C++ compiler is available (the C compiler costs extra money)? Currently lame generates nearly uncountable errors with a C++ compiler. I'm having a similar problem trying to compile LAME for my system, for which only a BASIC compiler is

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Frank's coherence [off topic?]

2000-09-05 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Gabriel, Am I the only one wich doesn't understand what Frank is telling? Can anyone explain a little? You are not alone. Once I get past his aggressively authoritative posting style (which is a major disincentive to understanding for me), I find I understand about half of what Frank

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Correlation mid/side

2000-09-05 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Robert, Alex, if you remember Frank's post about DC offsets, there he attached a little C program to calculate AC/DC offsets as well as a correlation between left and right channels. (was around 00/08/05) I'm not sure I read those - DC offsets aren't particularly relevant to my current

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic)

2000-09-14 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Steve, Does anyone know a good technic/routine to time-stretch a buffer of audio data (mono channel) ? Assuming that you want to keep the pitch the same, phase vocoding comes to mind. This is an old speech processing trick (thus the vocoder) for shifting pitch without changing speed

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic)

2000-09-15 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Mike, Wow, great pointer. The DSP Dimension page had one of the most concise and yet clear discussions of pitch scaling I've seen. (And it's nice to know that I didn't need to hedge so much in my original response - my memory was pretty much spot on...) I'm going to have to read through

[MP3 ENCODER] Miscellaneous MP3 questions

2000-09-26 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy All, I just finished adding a very basic intensity stereo implementation to our encoder, using what little the ISO spec had to say on the subject as a guide. It doesn't really improve the sound much, but I suspect that this has to do with the questions I encountered (and worked around)

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Miscellaneous MP3 questions

2000-09-27 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy Robert, Thanks for the quick response. 2) In layer-II coding, the first band to code using intensity is specified by the mode extension - in layer-III it can by dynamically varied and is understood implicitly from the bitstream by the decoder. But the spec gives no suggestions

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] AIFC - MP3 encoding

2000-10-05 Thread alex . broadhead
Howdy, Unless they have changed it significantly since I last looked at it (quite a while ago) AIFC is just AIFF with the added possibility of using compressed audio instead of raw PCM. Either format is 'chunk' based, like RIFF-WAVE. That is, an AIFF/C file consists of a number of chunks, most