What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
I now prepared the required repositories:
scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio
contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs.
The facets
On 05/16/2012 08:37 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch
might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing.
If you do not I would appreciate a look over my branch to check if I
missed sth.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch
might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing.
If you do not I would
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104970/
---
Review request for Nepomuk.
Description
---
Port of review request
