Re: [NTG-context] interlaced overbrace and underbrace

2019-10-25 Thread Hans Hagen
{\hbox to 15mm{ }}$$ \blank {\tfx(the underbrace should move down a little more)} \stoptext the best i can so is to provide more options (one day drawing these things might come to a grinding halt because of them) \starttext \startbuffer $a + \doublebrace[lt=1em] {b+c+d} + e$\blank

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector with Metafun (again)

2018-12-04 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
{a+b+c+d} \quad 53 \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank 54 $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad 55 \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank 56 $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad 57 \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank 58 $\overbar

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
k $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\o

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-20 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
{a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad > \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad > \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d}

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-07 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
gt; \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192} > math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ; > \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > % so far > > \setupmathstackers > [both] % vfenced] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] >

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-06 Thread Hans Hagen
d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+

Re: [NTG-context] underbraces slightly too narrow (with MkIV 2013.05.28)

2013-07-11 Thread Hans Hagen
in a next version you can do this: \setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt] is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set for \overbrace \overparent \overbracket \overbar \underbrace \underparent \underbracket \underbar \doublebrace \doubleparent \doublebracket