Yes. It works without lualibs-os
Thanks
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
On 8/14/2023 9:13 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
It does not work:
\directlua{
34require "lualibs-os"
35 >> tex.sprint(math.floor(os.resultof("git log --pretty=oneline | wc
-l")+1))}
What do you run directlua in LMTX?
in this case, what does does lualibs-os provide? os.resultof is built
It does not work:
\directlua{
34require "lualibs-os"
35 >> tex.sprint(math.floor(os.resultof("git log --pretty=oneline | wc
-l")+1))}
What do you run directlua in LMTX?
___
If your question is of
On 8/13/2023 10:39 PM, Xavier B. wrote:
Running LMTX I have an error: lualibs-os not found:
lua error > lua error on line 35 in file
ng-pre-informacio-document.conTeXt:
token call, execute:
...nt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module
'lualibs-os' not found:
Running LMTX I have an error: lualibs-os not found:
lua error > lua error on line 35 in file
ng-pre-informacio-document.conTeXt:
token call, execute:
...nt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module
'lualibs-os' not found:
no field
(and different linebreaking).
> >
> > \showglyphs
> >
> > \startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
> > \ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
>
at tug meetings on YT.
The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar
(and different linebreaking).
\showglyphs
\startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
\ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar
box{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
if you want nicer math switch over to lmtx as mkiv is sort of frozen and
efforts wrt math go into lmtx
Hans
a raised bar
(and different linebreaking).
\showglyphs
\startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
\ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 12.08.2023 um 11:13:
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
Looks ok here (see atached). Does the modern-math.lfg file have:
: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
overbar.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\startTEXpage[offset=1ts]
$\overbar{OA} = 4.2$
\stopTEXpage
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non
> proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
> $\overbar{OA} = 4,2$
> \stoptext
>
> Then the overbar has the bar in a very long altitude.
> Can you please, see the output attached.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
on proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
> est laborum.
> $\overbar{OA} = 4,2$
> \stoptext
>
> Then the overbar has the bar in a very long altitude.
> Can you please, see the output attached.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Xavier
>
> PS: I use context
in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu
fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in
culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
$\overbar{OA} = 4,2$
\stoptext
Then the overbar has the bar in a very long altitude.
Can you please, see the output
fset=1dk]
>\im{
>f' = f'' = f''' = f =
> a + b + \ldots + c +
>\overbar{x} + \overbar{S} + \bar{x} + \widebar{x}
>}
>
>\im{
>\fenced[doublebar]{x} =
>\fenced[doublebar][size=1]{x_1} =
>\fenced[doubl
Hi,
I uploaded a new version. We further improved Antykwa support,
\switchtobodyfont[antykwa]
\startTEXpage[offset=1dk]
\im{
f' = f'' = f''' = f =
a + b + \ldots + c +
\overbar{x} + \overbar{S} + \bar{x} + \widebar{x}
}
\im{
\fenced[doublebar]{x
\underrandom doesn’t work
\underrandoms doesn’t work
\overbar works, but not in TABLE
\overbars works
\overstrike works, but not in TABLE
\overstrikes works
\understrike works, but not in TABLE
\understrikes works
The nested example
\overbar{Über} \underbar{Unterstrich \underbar{steigt
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Johann Birnick via ntg-context wrote:
> please have a look at the following example:
>
> \starttext
> $\overbar{\alpha} \overbar{\beta}$
> \stoptext
>
> The first one works just fine, whereas the second one looks very odd.
> (At least in MkIV...)
Hey there,
please have a look at the following example:
\starttext
$\overbar{\alpha} \overbar{\beta}$
\stoptext
The first one works just fine, whereas the second one looks very odd.
(At least in MkIV...)
Any ideas?
Best,
Johann
of are under and over. Say that we
have a\overbar{bc}d. Should the spacing between a and the \overbar{bc}
and the spacing between \overbar{bc} and d always be tight? If so,
these might just be ord, and no new class needed (although one could
argue for adding the classes now, set them up as ord
mostly in fencing
situations to have the exponent come a bit closer to the closing
parenthesis.
\left( \frac{x}{2} \right)^{\! k+2n}
I have seen this in many places before, so no originality is claimed.
Two more classes that we thought of are under and over. Say that we
have a\overbar{bc}d. Should
added that so one can nest the mp driven ones but still within the
same category ... i'll look into a mix (more complex management wise so
typically a rainy weekend thing; i know how to do it but ...)
If I use \overbar within \underbar, the same dy is used, i.e. in the
example, the first \overbar
}{\stopeffect\blank[5cm]}}
%\enablemode[hideSolution]
\starttext
\framed[]{This is what I want:}
\framedtext[]{
\StartHide
\samplefile{knuth}
Overbar is not \overbar{hidden}.
{\processMPbuffer[circles]}
\StopHide
}
\stoptext
In your case it's easier than you mightt think:
\framedtext[empty=yes
[hideSolution]
\starttext
\framed[]{This is what I want:}
\framedtext[]{
\StartHide
\samplefile{knuth}
Overbar is not \overbar{hidden}.
{\processMPbuffer[circles]}
\StopHide
}
\stoptext
___
If your
On 3/10/2021 2:06 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
Hi, list. The following works well in LMTX, but it applies underlining
to the next dash sign when compiled with MkIV:
\starttext
%\overbar{foo}-bar
\underbar{foo}-bar
\stoptext
I've found a workaround for it, but I want to know about
Hi, list. The following works well in LMTX, but it applies underlining to
the next dash sign when compiled with MkIV:
\starttext
%\overbar{foo}-bar
\underbar{foo}-bar
\stoptext
I've found a workaround for it, but I want to know about the reason for
such a strange behavior. Thanks beforehand
Hi all.
I am reasonably sure that in mkii this overbar accent was placed correctly,
but in mkiv it is shifted to the left. Any ideas on how to fix it?
MWE:
\usemodule[mathml]
\starttext
This \xmlprocessdata{}{p}{} isn't
right.
\stoptext
Many thanks,
Duncan
Hello,
the following small sample illustrates the problem:
\starttext
\enabletrackers[math.stackers.texts]
\math{\overbar {ABC}} %<-- somewhat okay
\math{\overbar {F}} %<-- too short on the right side
%manual fixing
\math{\overbar {ABC\mkern\onemuskip}}
\math{\overbar {F\
it with the command
\overline (or \overbar) and the result is not nice.
Can someone tell me please whether it is possible to modify the \mathring
command so that th ecircle is a little bit larger, or the one I define below as
\interior in order to have a correct result (more clearly said: I would
c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d
{a+b+c+d} \quad
53 \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
54 $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
55 \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
56 $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
57 \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
58 $\overbar
k
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\o
underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 00:47 +0200, Sebastian L. wrote:
> It works for single characters, not over braces and brackets though. But
> that's what it was important for for me.
>
> \starttext
>
> \overbar{1}
>
> $\overbar{1}$
>
> $\bar{a}$
>
>
.
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
$\bar{a}$
$\bar{(abcd)}$
$\bar{\left(abcd\right)}$
\stoptext
Thanks though Henri.
On 9/26/2017 12:33 AM, Henri wrote:
Not a solution, but in math mode you should use $\bar{1}$ which is
the proper math accent.
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:51
It works for single characters, not over braces and brackets though. But
that's what it was important for for me.
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
$\bar{a}$
$\bar{(abcd)}$
$\bar{\left(abcd\right)}$
\stoptext
Thanks though Henri.
On 9/26/2017 12:33 AM, Henri
Not a solution, but in math mode you should use $\bar{1}$ which is the proper
math accent.
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:51 +0200, Sebastian L. wrote:
> Hi fellas,
>
> after some recent beta change some of my documents differ in output
> compared to past builds, when it comes to \ove
Hi fellas,
after some recent beta change some of my documents differ in output
compared to past builds, when it comes to \overbar command in math mode.
MWE:
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
\stoptext
In math mode the example looks broken... Did I miss a change
Dear,
I am sorry to bring up \overline, \overbar, and \bar issue.
Here is a sample file and
I attached two pdf files which were compiled using two different version of
ConTeXt.
Under the LuaTeX v. 1.03, ConTeXt ver: 2017.03.02 22:23 MKIV beta, the output
overlineB.pdf is OK,
but under
Dear Henri,
Thank you for your reply.
I used to use ‘\overline’ in LaTeX as shown in many texts, but it is time to
change.
Thanks again.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as
Neither is correct in a mathematics context. Use \bar.
On 05/10/2017 05:54 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are
> slightly different.
> I used \overline in LaTeX.
> But it takes more vertical space that c
Dear all,
In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are slightly
different.
I used \overline in LaTeX.
But it takes more vertical space that cause the alignment trouble while using
\overbar has no problem at all.
Is it normal behavior?
Thank you.
Best regards
Bump. Even a simple yes/no answer would be nice. Is this behaviour intended?
Am 2017-03-29 um 17:03 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm <te...@fiee.net>:
> Ahoi,
>
> I played with the "bar" commands:
>
> \underbar{underlined \underbar{more and \underbar{more}
> \ov
Ahoi,
I played with the "bar" commands:
\underbar{underlined \underbar{more and \underbar{more} \overbar{\underbar{and}
\overbar{over}} and back}}
While stacking bars is nice, overbar and underbar exclude each other, while
underbar takes precedence. Is this intended? I expected
{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d}
gt; \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> % so far
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [both] % vfenced]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for
$A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just on top of the expression?
Thanks,
Xan
PS: Please CCme
___
If your question
On 8/20/2014 9:38 AM, Xan wrote:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is
there any way for putting overbar just on top of the expression?
Can you be more explicit? I get the attached.
Thanks,
Xan
PS: Please CCme
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200
Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net ha escrit:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one
for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just on top of the
expression?
Thanks,
Xan
PS: Please CCme
Yes.
x.pdf
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Xan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200
Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net ha escrit:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is
there any way for putting overbar just on top of the expression?
Thanks,
Xan
Yes
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Xan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200
Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net ha escrit:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one
for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just on top
Hello there,
I tried to overbar an arabic word, and noticed, that the bar is too low
and overlaps the letters. While producing a minexample, I noticed that
this might be a issue of my font, because this does not happen with
Arial. See this minexample:
\definefont[arial][name:arial*arabic
Am 01.04.2014 um 11:37 schrieb H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de:
Hello there,
I tried to overbar an arabic word, and noticed, that the bar is too low and
overlaps the letters. While producing a minexample, I noticed that this might
be a issue of my font, because this does not happen
?
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3]
I tried the font-independent unit em
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3em]
but that does not work.
Huseyin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
every page).
Which unit has this offset?
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3]
I tried the font-independent unit em
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3em]
but that does not work.
as 'ex' is bad font that font, you can try 'em' :
\setupbars[overbar][offset=1.2,unit=em,rulethickness=.05
in a next version you can do this:
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set
for
\overbrace
\overparent
\overbracket
\overbar
\underbrace
\underparent
\underbracket
\underbar
\doublebrace
\doubleparent
\doublebracket
Am 10.06.2013 um 17:43 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:33 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de
wrote:
... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
it should be ok now
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wolf...@st.estfiles.dewrote:
Am 10.06.2013 um 17:43 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:33 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:33 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote:
... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
it should be ok now with the latest standalone
--
luigi
Hi Hans,
this seems to be a bug: the overbar should not be set separately again over A
\usemodule[mathml] \starttext
\startbuffer
math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML;
mrow
mover accent=true
mrow
msub
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote:
Hi Hans,
this seems to be a bug: the overbar should not be set separately again
over A
\usemodule[mathml] \starttext
\startbuffer
math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML;
mrow
mover accent
... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
but coded in MathML.
st.
Bildschirmfoto 2013-06-09 um 16.25.37.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as
Dear gang,
First: Here's wishing you all the most happy holidays and an early happy
new years.
=
ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.14 10:44 MKIV
\starttext
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=green,offset=7]
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=red,dy=7]
\overbar{test}
\stoptext
Am 27.12.2012 um 02:17 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
isha...@colostate.edu:
Dear gang,
First: Here's wishing you all the most happy holidays and an early happy new
years.
=
ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.14 10:44 MKIV
\starttext
\overbar{test}
\setupbars
:
Dear gang,
First: Here's wishing you all the most happy holidays and an early
happy new years.
=
ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.14 10:44 MKIV
\starttext
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=green,offset=7]
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=red,dy=7]
\overbar{test}
\stoptext
=
offset
Test Test\footnote{footnote}~Test Test Test\par
Test\inleft{\resetallattributes \color[red]{\overbar{marginal}}}
Test Test Test Test Test \par
}
\stoptext
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others
to add it to the margin notes.
but you can add by hand
\starttext
\underbar{%
Test Test Test\footnote{footnote}~Test Test Test\par
Test\inleft{\resetallattributes \color[red]{\overbar{marginal}}} Test
Test Test Test Test \par
}
\stoptext
and disable features which rely
disable the rule with the \resetallattributes command but it’s
up to Hans to add it to the margin notes.
but you can add by hand
\starttext
\underbar{%
Test Test Test\footnote{footnote}~Test Test Test\par
Test\inleft{\resetallattributes \color[red]{\overbar{marginal}}}
Test Test
add by hand
\starttext
\underbar{%
Test Test Test\footnote{footnote}~Test Test Test\par
Test\inleft{\resetallattributes
\color[red]{\overbar{marginal}}} Test Test Test Test Test \par
}
\stoptext
and disable features which rely on attributes
.
\overbar{test}
btw, never do a \setupframed globally as it will infect many derived
frames components ... best do a \defineframed ... then
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Hi,
I'd like to have something like this:
Let $X$ be a~real Banach space, $D$~an open subset of~$X$
containing~$0$ and $T$ a~continuous mapping from $\overbar{D}$
to~$X$. We say that $T$ satisfies the {\em Mönch condition} if the
following implication holds:
\blank[small
Am 06.09.2011 um 12:19 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Hi,
I'd like to have something like this:
Let $X$ be a~real Banach space, $D$~an open subset of~$X$
containing~$0$ and $T$ a~continuous mapping from $\overbar{D}$
to~$X$. We say that $T$ satisfies the {\em Mönch condition
Dear Otared,
Am Freitag, den 04.02.2011, 20:45 +0100 schrieb Otared Kavian:
I think one should use \overline instead of \overbar in your example. For me
the following works fine with mkiv:
\starttext
\startformula
\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q}}{\overline{α_0
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
thank you for your answer. `\overline` works as you say, but it looks
typographically different in the respect that the bar is closer to the
letter, which of course solves the issue for the inline fraction. For α
this looks quite strange in my eyes. But I
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I do have some problem with the following example (also attached,
executed with `context test`).
\starttext
\startformula
\overbar{q} = \frac{\overbar{q}}{\overbar{α_0}}
\stopformula
In text $\overbar{q} = \frac{\overbar{q}}{\overbar
Hi Paul,
I think one should use \overline instead of \overbar in your example. For me
the following works fine with mkiv:
\starttext
\startformula
\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q}}{\overline{α_0}}
\stopformula
In text $\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q
On 26-1-2011 11:54, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
I just came across this discrepancy:
\starttext
\startformula
H_1 + H_A = f(\underbar{α})
\stopformula
$ H_1 + H_A = f(\underbar{α}) $
\startformula
H_1 + H_A = f(\overbar{α})
\stopformula
$ H_1 + H_A = f(\overbar{α}) $
\stoptext
Hi,
I just came across this discrepancy:
\starttext
\startformula
H_1 + H_A = f(\underbar{α})
\stopformula
$ H_1 + H_A = f(\underbar{α}) $
\startformula
H_1 + H_A = f(\overbar{α})
\stopformula
$ H_1 + H_A = f(\overbar{α}) $
\stoptext
Is this known or is under/overbar broken
2011/1/26 Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de
Hi,
I just came across this discrepancy:
\starttext
\startformula
H_1 + H_A = f(\underbar{α})
\stopformula
$ H_1 + H_A = f(\underbar{α}) $
\startformula
H_1 + H_A = f(\overbar{α})
\stopformula
$ H_1 + H_A = f(\overbar{α
:
assignObj(@\#,Segment);
ObjPoint a,b;
ObjCode @\#b-@\#a=(1cm,2cm);
fi ;
enddef;
def drawSegment(suffix n)=
draw n.a--n.b;
draw btex \tt \overbar{E} etex shifted n.a; % 1
enddef;
\stopMPdefinitions
\starttext
\startMPpage
newSegment.s;
ObjLabel.s(btex hello
to add a simple TeX label (\tt \overbar{E}) to the drawing
macro, but failed.
When including the line marked with % 1 the TeX run fails. I don't
understand why.
The line with % 2 is taken frome the metaobj manual (section 5.8) [1],
but including this doesn't work either.
It would be great
Hi,
there was an earlier issue with \underbar{b}
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20091109.094902.baf77ffc.en.html
which seems somewhat related to my problem. When providing only one
character as argument to \underbar or \overbar and a following space (or
paragraph ending) the line
Hi,
Just a question: what's the equivalent of \overbar in math mode.
\underbar works in math mode, but \overbar does not.
Thanks a lot,
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question: what's the equivalent of \overbar in math mode. \underbar
works in math mode, but \overbar does not.
\bar or \overline
Aditya
___
If your question
# \NR
\numbers{text}
\overbar{text}
\overbars{text text}
# \overlaybutton
# \overlayfigure
\overstrike{text}
\overstrikes{text text}
\packed
\page[options]
\pagereference[reference]
\pagetype[name]
\paragraph
\part[references]{text}
\periods[number]
\placebookmarks[names][names|all
Hi nico/Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
mo #x000AF; /mo
The MathML spec specifically suggests the use of OverBar; instead
of a literal accent character in situations like this.
For the macron, accent=false should only influence the vertical
placement, not its stretchiness.
Cheers, taco
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:18:32 +0200, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi nico/Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
mo #x000AF; /mo
The MathML spec specifically suggests the use of OverBar; instead
of a literal accent character in situations like this.
The problem is that it is also
nico wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:18:32 +0200, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi nico/Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
mo #x000AF; /mo
The MathML spec specifically suggests the use of OverBar; instead
of a literal accent character in situations like
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:02:10 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nico wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:18:32 +0200, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi nico/Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
mo #x000AF; /mo
The MathML spec specifically suggests the use of OverBar; instead
[OverBar]{\normalorfiller\hrule\hrulefill} etc
for math)
\usemodule[newmml]
\defineXMLentity[x000AF]{\normalorfiller\macron\hrulefill}
\startXMLdata
math
mrow
mover accent=true
mrow
mi x /mi
mo + /mo
mi y /mi
mo + /mo
Hi all,
I don't understand differences between \underbar and \overbar
Someone can explain ?
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Giuseppe—
Thanks for the tip about \high. That works (and looks cleaner in the
source file too). But
\grk{\overbar{\grk{kj}} Kull'hnhc d\high{\tfx\grk{ou}} med'eonta
ka`i Arkad'ihc polum'hlou}
still chokes on \overbar and returns the “insufficient symbol fonts”
error.
Alan
On Oct
Monday, October 31, 2005 Alan Bowen wrote:
Giuseppe
Thanks for the tip about \high. That works (and looks cleaner in the
source file too). But
\grk{\overbar{\grk{kj}} Kull'hnhc d\high{\tfx\grk{ou}} med'eonta
ka`i Arkad'ihc polum'hlou}
still chokes on \overbar and returns
{\overbar{kj}}).
Alan
On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:05 AM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Monday, October 31, 2005 Alan Bowen wrote:
Giuseppe—
Thanks for the tip about \high. That works (and looks cleaner in the
source file too). But
\grk{\overbar{\grk{kj}} Kull'hnhc d\high{\tfx\grk{ou}} med'eonta
ka
Giuseppe,
Many thanks for your help: it is very much appreciated.
\overbar{{\grk{kj}}} \grk{Kull'hnhc d\high{\tfx{ou}} med'eonta ka`i
Arkad'ihc polum'hlou}
works, but it really is more a work-around than a good solution.
Ideally, one would like to be able to do math when the body font
will be happy to provide the specs for the Greek fonts.
Best
Thomas
On Oct 31, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Alan Bowen wrote:
Giuseppe,
Many thanks for your help: it is very much appreciated.
\overbar{{\grk{kj}}} \grk{Kull'hnhc d\high{\tfx{ou}} med'eonta ka`i
Arkad'ihc polum'hlou}
works
I am getting some puzzling errors when I try to use the Greek fonts
in math formulae (to represent Greek numerals as written in mss.)
In a short file, both
\overbar{\grk{kj}} and
$\overline{\hbox{\grk{kj}}}$
work as expected, even when they occur in Greek text.
But in a long, complicated file
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
