Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context schrieb am 07.07.2022 um 21:25:
Am 07.07.22 um 20:52 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context:
How can I do this?
Sorry for the noise, I solved it with Lua. The cld manual even
contains a combinations example.
The Lua method is also simpler than a TeX
Am 07.07.22 um 20:52 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context:
How can I do this?
Sorry for the noise, I solved it with Lua. The cld manual even contains
a combinations example.
Hraban
___
If your question
Hi, I’d like to place pages from a multipage PDF in a combination:
\startcombination[3*1]
\dorecurse{3}{%
{\externalfigure[multipage][width=\textwidth/3,page=\recurselevel]}{}
}
\stopcombination
That doesn’t work, because ConTeXt expects a { after \startcombination.
(“A left brace
On 10/22/21 5:46 PM, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 10/22/2021 5:20 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote:
>> [...]
>> How could I get all lines with images vertically centered?
>
> maybe by using the command the right way ...
>
>\setupexternalfigure[location=default]
>
On 10/22/2021 5:20 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\setupexternalfigure[location=default]
\startcombination[nx=3, ny=2, location={middle}]
{\externalfigure[mill.png][width=.25\textwidth]}
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\setupexternalfigure[location=default]
\startcombination[nx=3, ny=2, location={middle}]
{\externalfigure[mill.png][width=.25\textwidth]}
{\externalfigure[cow.pdf][width=.25\textwidth]}
{\externalfigure[cow.pdf][width=.25\textwidth]}
>> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am trying to use a combination figure with luacode (both with
> >> latest MKIV and LMTX).
> >> However, the figures do not line up in the grid of the combination.
> >>
> >> I get the correct result with examples 1 and 2 be
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 12.10.2021 um 14:12:
On 10/11/2021 1:38 PM, Adam Reviczky via ntg-context wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use a combination figure with luacode (both with
latest MKIV and LMTX).
However, the figures do not line up in the grid of the combination.
I get
On 10/11/2021 1:38 PM, Adam Reviczky via ntg-context wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use a combination figure with luacode (both with latest
MKIV and LMTX).
However, the figures do not line up in the grid of the combination.
I get the correct result with examples 1 and 2 below, but example 3
Hi,
I am trying to use a combination figure with luacode (both with latest MKIV
and LMTX).
However, the figures do not line up in the grid of the combination.
I get the correct result with examples 1 and 2 below, but example 3 using
lua functions for combination and externalfigure is what I
/wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/definefirstline
> <https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/definefirstline>
>https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/Sorts-Mill-Goudy
> <https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/Sorts-Mill-Goudy>
>
> Nicola
Hi Nicola,
Thanks. This solves the indentation of the initial
On 9/9/20 6:24 PM, Charles Vejnar wrote:
> Dear Manuel,
>
> To combine multiple fonts, I do something like this:
>
> \definefallbackfamily [mainface] [serif] [DejaVu
> Serif][range=boxdrawing,force=yes]
> \definefontfamily [mainface] [serif] [Tinos]
> \setupbodyfont[mainface, 11pt]
>
> You
Dear Manuel,
To combine multiple fonts, I do something like this:
\definefallbackfamily [mainface] [serif] [DejaVu
Serif][range=boxdrawing,force=yes]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [serif] [Tinos]
\setupbodyfont[mainface, 11pt]
You might be able to use a Unicode block (ie range) for
Dear friends:
Until now (TeXLive 2018), to write Spanish and ancient Greek in the same
document, I used the "simplefonts" module, which is said in the wiki (ConTeXt
Garden) that it is obsolete. What is the method to do this with TeXLive 2020? I
try to combine one font for Spanish text (eg
On 10/31/19 11:43 AM, cont...@vivaldi.net wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> when do you plan to release next beta for ConTeXt with the fixed issue
> spoken bellow?
Hi Lukas,
I compile your minimal sample using any of these:
LuaTeX 1.11 7215 + ConTeXt MkIV 2019.10.29 15:00
LuaTeX 2.00 20190729 +
Hello Hans,
when do you plan to release next beta for ConTeXt with the fixed issue
spoken bellow?
Normally, one can get beta here:
http://www.pragma-ade.nl/download-2.htm
but there is still beta from 2019-10-29.
(I'm still using Lua 5.3 version of ConTeXt.)
Or is it enough to
On 10/22/2019 2:16 PM, cont...@vivaldi.net wrote:
Hello,
here is a minimal sample which doesn't compile:
\starttext
\startitemize
\item
A\footnote{%
B
\startitemize
\item C
\stopitemize
}\crlf
D
\item E % This
Hello,
here is a minimal sample which doesn't compile:
\starttext
\startitemize
\item
A\footnote{%
B
\startitemize
\item C
\stopitemize
}\crlf
D
\item E % This sample compiles when this line is commented (?!)
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:32:39 +0200
Marco Patzer wrote:
> However, I'd prefer to not have another environment around the
> combinations, but if there's no other way, I'd settle for your
> approach. So far that seems to be the best choice.
A combination is a construction, n
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:09:15 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> A alternative to using floats is to put the combination in a
> linecorrection environment, i.e.
>
> \startlinecorrection
> \startcombination [2*2]
> ...
> \stopcombination
in the example).
\setupcombination
[ before={\endgraf{\tttf [before]}\endgraf},
after={\endgraf{\tttf [after]}\endgraf},
inbetween={\endgraf{\tttf [inbetween]}\endgraf}]
A alternative to using floats is to put the combination in a
linecorrection environment, i.e
= label text
= inherits: \setupalign
= yes no
= COMMAND
= COMMAND
= COMMAND
= STYLE COMMAND
= COLOR
I hope this will enable you to get what you want.
Willi
> On 16 Jul 2019, at 17:08, Marco Patzer wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is there a way to influence the spacing after a combinat
Hi!
Is there a way to influence the spacing after a combination is
placed?
\useMPlibrary [dum]
\starttext
\startcombination [2*2]
\startcontent \externalfigure \stopcontent
\startcaption Foo\stopcaption
\startcontent \externalfigure \stopcontent
\startcaption Bar\stopcaption
On 8/1/2018 5:21 PM, Joshua Moerman wrote:
Hi ConTeXt people,
I found another issue with the crossref feature in ConTeXt. I get an error
when a {-} is used in a crossref. If it is used directly in the paper entry,
it works just fine. Replacing {-} by only - works, but the DBLP database
Hi ConTeXt people,
I found another issue with the crossref feature in ConTeXt. I get an error
when a {-} is used in a crossref. If it is used directly in the paper entry,
it works just fine. Replacing {-} by only - works, but the DBLP database
generates {-} and it would be nice to use that
with the combination
of both having a single figure number (and possibly the two individual
figures having labels (a) and (b), but that's not strictly required).
However if the page breaks are not favourable, it would be OK to split
the two figures, so that one ends up on the bottom of the previous
page
that would be on the same page with the combination
of both having a single figure number (and possibly the two individual
figures having labels (a) and (b), but that's not strictly required).
However if the page breaks are not favourable, it would be OK to split
the two figures, so that one ends
On Wed, 20 May 2015 16:43:32 +0200
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I could use two separate figure numbers, but then I would need to
change the text that references the figures (and when the layout
changes, so that I would figure out that both figures would eventually
fit
Am 20.05.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
Hello,
This is not strictly a ConTeXt question.
I have two almost identical figures which I want to display one after
the other. Ideally that would be on the same page with the combination
of both having
On 20 May 2015 at 15:43, Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is not strictly a ConTeXt question.
I have two almost identical figures which I want to display one after
the other. Ideally that would be on the same page with the combination
of both having a single
Hello,
This is not strictly a ConTeXt question.
I have two almost identical figures which I want to display one after
the other. Ideally that would be on the same page with the combination
of both having a single figure number (and possibly the two individual
figures having labels (a) and (b
Hi,
I would like to remove header numbers for subsections, but keep
subsections properly aligned in the table of contents. However, the
width= parameter seems to be completely ignored in that case.
Here's a nearly-minimal example:
\setuplist[section][width=10mm,style=bold]
Am 23.05.2014 um 13:08 schrieb Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I would like to remove header numbers for subsections, but keep
subsections properly aligned in the table of contents. However, the
width= parameter seems to be completely ignored in that case.
Here's a
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 13:08 schrieb Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I would like to remove header numbers for subsections, but keep
subsections properly aligned in the table of contents. However, the
width= parameter seems to be completely ignored in
Hello,
I tried to use a combination in a placefigure command with two figures side by
side:
\placefigure[2][ref]{figure caption}
{\startcombination
{subcaption 1} {\externalfigure[myfigure1]} {subcaption 2}
{\externalfigure[myfigure2]}
\stopcombination
}
But the result
On 2014-02-08 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I haven't find any better way to extend the caption width than that
negative value for narrowed text. It works, but that empty space above
looks weird
You have to force a certain width for your images because the width
of the text space depends
Am 08.02.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Jan Tosovsky j.tosov...@email.cz:
On 2014-02-08 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I haven't find any better way to extend the caption width than that
negative value for narrowed text. It works, but that empty space above
looks weird
You have to force a certain
On 2013-12-27 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
I try to fill the entire page with two images with their captions. The
final page should be floating, keeping both images together and not
containing any other text.
I found this solution. It work fine for short captions / wide images.
\starttext
test
On 2014-02-07 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-12-27 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
If captions are long and the image narrow, they are typeset on
multiple lines. Default centering produces the ragged column -
both not very nice and difficult to read. When the alignment is
set to hanging, it looks
Am 08.02.2014 um 00:07 schrieb Jan Tosovsky j.tosov...@email.cz:
This is the improved example. The only remaining issue is an one empty line
between the image and the label when \startnarrower command is used.
Please compare two pages w/o this option set:
extended to e.g. 80% of text width? If not
via the 'combination', are there any better alternatives for my use case?
Any hint is appreciated.
Thanks, Jan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
} \VL\NR
\stoptable}{}
\stopcombination
\stoptext
It works without the combination, without the vertical or horizontal
rule and when no math mode is used. It used to work some time ago,
so I assume it's a bug.
it went unnoticed as works in my experimental branch ... i just forgot
to copy
\stoptext
It works without the combination, without the vertical or horizontal
rule and when no math mode is used. It used to work some time ago,
so I assume it's a bug.
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
get rid
of it? (see attached example)
2. This error only appears only with \placecontent[criterium=local] in
combination with a beginning line of \writebetweenlist; with a global
\placecontent and \writebetweenlist it works fine. To reproduce this
uncomment the line %\placecontent
The Germans do not like ligatures across compound words, and that is
much harder to do in an automated way (not in fonts themselves at
least).
That's a good point, but it's a slightly different issue from
prohibiting some ligatures altogether: in German ligatures should be
disabled depending
thinking of it: one reason why a general purpose word processor used
by people with no idea about things like ligatures, is that
ligatures are language dependent
I don't think that's necessary relevant: the only example I can think
of language-dependent ligatures is fi and ffi for Turkish
Quite so. The words I was wrong seem to be a bit difficult for
some people.
Yes, it's amazing how to some people you're wrong sounds like an
offence, and the explanation of why an outright insult.
Arthur
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:28:20PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
thinking of it: one reason why a general purpose word processor used
by people with no idea about things like ligatures, is that
ligatures are language dependent
I don't think that's necessary relevant: the only example
On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:16 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Someone had to show me the first ligature years ago and when he did
that, I had to check every single book and document I had at hand to
check if ligatures were really commonly used. I simply couldn't
believe my eyes and the fact
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/26/2013 11:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
PS: if you really hate the ligatures, you can try to help improve this
interesting package to handle ligatures (it probably has the most
potential in engines other than XeTeX/LuaTeX because it's a
Hi Thomas,
Am 25.04.2013 um 08:56 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de:
On 04/25/2013 08:20 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
First I think it better if ligatures should be off as a default.
Then you should not be using any form of TeX. ligatures have been part of TeX
since its
On 4/26/2013 9:41 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Am 25.04.2013 um 08:56 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de:
On 04/25/2013 08:20 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
First I think it better if ligatures should be off as a default.
Then you should not be using any form of
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
On the other side, I believe, ligatures of off by default in LaTeX, et
al. or at least are feature
is set when the font is loaded.
So you neither use LaTeX nor ConTeXt?
Hi Khaled,
When I used LaTeX last if I had fi in my text that is how it came out!
Using ConTeXt I noticed that fi becomes a ligature, did not like, but it
was not that important.
Till I decided to start using ConTeXt I had been using XeLaTeX.
regards
Keith.
Am 26.04.2013 um 10:20
On 4/26/2013 2:12 PM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Khaled,
When I used LaTeX last if I had fi in my text that is how it came out!
Using ConTeXt I noticed that fi becomes a ligature, did not like, but it
was not that important.
also keep in mind that ligatures are language dependent (if the font
On 04/26/2013 09:41 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
I use XeLaTeX and ConText for it control. I have not touched Word in decades,
if possible
or any other WYSIWYG- system!
That being said, take a look at the books printed in this day and age.
You will find that
the use
I don’t know what LaTeX you were using, but LaTeX does not and will not
disable ligatures by default (there isn’t even a way in original TeX to
disable ligatures globally, short of editing TFM files).
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:12:07PM +0200, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Khaled,
Hi Khaled,
to be honest I never noticed them when I was using LaTeX. It might have been
the fonts.
I can live with them being on as a default in ConTeXt and know now how to turn
them
off.
regards
Keith.
Am 26.04.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
I don’t know
Am 26.04.2013 um 18:43 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de:
Hi Keith,
if you look at the books of decent publishers, you will see that most of them
still use ligatures (most American university presses, Oxford and Cambridge,
German publishers such as Reclam etc.)
Greetings, Keith, Thomas, and all,
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:43:59 -0600, Thomas A. Schmitz
thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de wrote:
if you look at the books of decent publishers, you will see that most of
them still use ligatures (most American university presses, Oxford and
Cambridge, German
On 04/26/2013 10:05 PM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
I never said that they do not have ligatures. I never said XeLaTeX does not have
the ability to use them I have read the fontspec manual!
You wrote:
On the other side, I believe, ligatures of off by default in LaTeX
which is wrong. That's
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
to be honest I never noticed them when I was using LaTeX. It might have been
the fonts.
Someone had to show me the first ligature years ago and when he did
that, I had to check every single book and document I had at hand to
check if
On 4/26/2013 11:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
to be honest I never noticed them when I was using LaTeX. It might have been
the fonts.
Someone had to show me the first ligature years ago and when he did
that, I had to check every single
On 4/26/2013 10:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
...It points out that Word
is the reason why some people consider ligatures unusual.
thinking of it: one reason why a general purpose word processor used by
people with no idea about things like ligatures, is that ligatures are
language
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:16:42AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/26/2013 11:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I consider this (the fact that one doesn't notice it) part of a good
design. It's similar with kerning: one doesn't notice it until/unless
it's bad. It's similar in the kitchen also. One
Hi Wolfgang, All,
First I think it better if ligatures should be off as a default.
Now, to my actual question.
Is there a way in ConText to selectively true certain ligatures on/ff.
for example fl could be on, but fi off.
I know that I can set up the the editor to do it, or use unicode
On 04/25/2013 08:20 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
First I think it better if ligatures should be off as a default.
Then you should not be using any form of TeX. ligatures have been part
of TeX since its invention (TeXbook, p. 4), and they have been part of
fine typesetting since Gutenberg.
Hi,
\usemodule[simplefonts]
\setmainfont[AGaramondPro]
\starttext
Amficool
\stoptext
gives an i without dot, see attachment. And the letters i and f
are curiously bonded.
The second attachment shows the same word written in MS-Word, again with
Adobe Garamond Pro, without this curiosity.
Am 24.04.2013 um 10:39 schrieb H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de:
Hi,
\usemodule[simplefonts]
\setmainfont[AGaramondPro]
\starttext
Amficool
\stoptext
gives an i without dot, see attachment. And the letters i and f are
curiously bonded.
The second attachment shows the same word
On Wed, Apr 24 2013, H. Özoguz wrote:
The second attachment shows the same word written in MS-Word, again with Adobe
Garamond Pro, without this curiosity.
Perhaps a bug in M$-Word...? ;)
--
Peter
___
Ok thanks, feature, not a bug, embarassing ... but good to learn :)
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
Am 24.04.2013 um 11:00 schrieb Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr:
On Wed, Apr 24 2013, H. Özoguz wrote:
The second attachment shows the same word written in MS-Word, again with
Adobe
Garamond Pro, without this curiosity.
Perhaps a bug in M$-Word...? ;)
Microsoft added support for
On 09.04.2013 00:29, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 08.04.2013 um 19:46 schrieb Xenia yor...@googlemail.com:
Hi context list,
I want to place three figures in a row, but two of them as part of a
combination with a common caption.
I tried this with columns, but did not manage it, because I
Hi context list,
I want to place three figures in a row, but two of them as part of a
combination with a common caption.
I tried this with columns, but did not manage it, because I only read
how to span 2 columns with single figures.
How can this be done properly?
Thanks,
Xenia
Am 08.04.2013 um 19:46 schrieb Xenia yor...@googlemail.com:
Hi context list,
I want to place three figures in a row, but two of them as part of a
combination with a common caption.
I tried this with columns, but did not manage it, because I only read
how to span 2 columns with single
Am 03.10.2012 um 13:47 schrieb Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com:
Hi,
how to left align the elements of a combination?
\useMPlibrary [dum]
\setupexternalfigures [height=2cm]
\starttext
%% does nothing: \setupcombinations [align=flushleft]
\startcombination [2*2]
{\externalfigure
The alignment of the elements in a combination is wrong with the
current beta. All elements are left aligned, in beta 2011.11.29 they
were centred. Example:
\useMPlibrary [dum]
\starttext
\startcombination [2*2]
{\externalfigure[dummy][width=1cm]}{alpha}
{\externalfigure[dummy
On 11-3-2012 12:35, Marco wrote:
The alignment of the elements in a combination is wrong with the
current beta. All elements are left aligned, in beta 2011.11.29 they
were centred. Example:
\useMPlibrary [dum]
\starttext
\startcombination [2*2]
{\externalfigure[dummy][width=1cm
Hello,
I'd like to print several frames of a precise size, one after other, e.g. 2 per
row, 2 rows.
I'm trying to use combination for this purpose - but I'd need to suppress any
horizontal and vertical gap between cells.
Is there any option which would cause this?
My code so far:
t
This should work:
\setupcombinations[distance=0mm]
Pavel Dohnal
2012/3/8 Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. l...@pontex.cz
Hello,
I'd like to print several frames of a precise size, one after other, e.g.
2 per row, 2 rows.
I'm trying to use combination for this purpose - but I'd need
:
This should work:
\setupcombinations[distance=0mm]
Pavel Dohnal
2012/3/8 Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. l...@pontex.cz
Hello,
I'd like to print several frames of a precise size, one after other, e.g.
2 per row, 2 rows.
I'm trying to use combination for this purpose - but I'd need
It seems that margin notes when called from inside
\startcombination..\stopcombination do not reach the margin of the paper.
Instead they use a margin inside the combination.
Is that as intended or unavoidable?
It was my objective to have them at the edge of the paper.
See minimal example below
Hi,
in the attachment is an example file which describes best what i want do. The
method with \offset and \clip to place the figures where i want is really
brutal force i think. Especially fiddling around with dimension to get the
right fit“ is tedious. Is there a better solution to do such a
Hello,
Nesting \placesidebyside inside \startcombination\stopcombination
appears to throw-off the spacing.
Alan
%%%
% Minimal example:
% (left pair is misplaced)
%%%
\setupcombinations [distance=0cm]
\starttext
\framed [width=8cm] {%
Hello,
I searched the mailing archive but found nothing about my problem.
I have 3 figures to put into combination 2*2. The way it is handle it
that the third figure is place below the first one, which is quite
logical. I'd rather have it centered in the second row. Is there any
mean
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Nicolas Luchier wrote:
Hello,
I searched the mailing archive but found nothing about my problem.
I have 3 figures to put into combination 2*2. The way it is handle
it that the third figure is place below the first one, which is
quite logical. I'd rather have
On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:09:31 Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Nicolas Luchier wrote:
I have 3 figures to put into combination 2*2. The way it is handle
it that the third figure is place below the first one, which is
quite logical. I'd rather have it centered
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Nicolas Luchier nicolas.luch...@cea.fr wrote:
I have 3 figures to put into combination 2*2. The way it is handle it that
the third figure is place below the first one, which is quite logical. I'd
rather have it centered in the second row. Is there any mean
Hi,
The solution works indeed. Thanks to all of you. There is a related
refinement I'd like but don't know Context enough to bring by myself:
\starttext
This is a combination of 3 figures on two lines
\placefigure{none}
{
\midaligned{
\startcombination[1*2
Hi,
is there a better way to place two tables (with the tabulate environment)
side by side, I wrap them now in a vbox but this destroyes the spacing
before and after them. I know floatcombination but I don't want to use it
at the moment.
\starttext
\startcombination[2*1]
{\vbox\bgroup
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi,
is there a better way to place two tables (with the tabulate environment)
side by side, I wrap them now in a vbox but this destroyes the spacing
before and after them. I know floatcombination but I don't want to use it
at the moment.
Am 13.11.2008 um 16:12 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi,
is there a better way to place two tables (with the tabulate
environment)
side by side, I wrap them now in a vbox but this destroyes the
spacing
before and after them. I know
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:02:24 +0100
Peter Schorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\placefigure
[force][fig:xy]
{captiontext}
{\placelegend
{\startcombination[2*1]
{\externalfigure[xxx]}{}
{\externalfigure[yyy]}{}
\stopcombination}
{Quelle: XY}}
\placefigure
[force][fig:xy]
{captiontext}
{\placelegend
{\startcombination[2*1]
{\externalfigure[xxx]}{}
{\externalfigure[yyy]}{}
\stopcombination}
{Quelle: XY}}
Thanks, both solutions work. Is there something simelar for placelegend in
splitfloat?
2007/11/16, Peter Schorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
as soon I enter the cbox-line the combination is not longer centered. I tried
to embed the combination in a cbox, but that had no effect. Has anyone a hint
how to center the combination successfullly?
\starttext
\placefigure
[force
Hi,
as soon I enter the cbox-line the combination is not longer centered. I tried
to embed the combination in a cbox, but that had no effect. Has anyone a hint
how to center the combination successfullly?
\starttext
\placefigure
[force][fig:xy]
{captiontext
On Nov 16, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Peter Schorsch wrote:
Hi,
as soon I enter the cbox-line the combination is not longer
centered. I tried
to embed the combination in a cbox, but that had no effect. Has
anyone a hint
how to center the combination successfullly?
\starttext
\placefigure
Hi,
is there a possiblity to adjust the space between graphics in a
combination? In my case I have to graphics and I want a larger gap
between them.
Thanks in advance ...
Steffen
___
If your question is of interest
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Steffen Fritzsche wrote:
Hi,
is there a possiblity to adjust the space between graphics in a
combination? In my case I have to graphics and I want a larger gap
between them.
See \setupcombination in the manual (page 227-228)
Aditya
M.J. Kallen wrote:
Hi Taco and everyone else,
working with \placepublications[criterium=cite] inside sections, I
noticed that the behavior is not the same when using a section with
ownnumber=yes. The local list of publications does not appear in the
latter case. I've made a sample
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
