Re: [NTG-context] margin comment above heading

On 6/17/20 11:26 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > [...] > Pablo, do I understand right that you’re converting XML and the > comment comes last in that structure, but you need it first?> I.e. > the real question is how to process the XML structure in a different > order, r

Re: [NTG-context] margin comment above heading

t; \setupinterlinespace[1sp] >>\stopsetups This was from a previous form of the sample. If the paragraph is really tiny, it would be easier not to have a page break between that paragraph and the >>\setupinteraction[state=start] >>\showframe\showgrid >>

Re: [NTG-context] margin comment above heading

; \setupinterlinespace[1sp] >> \stopsetups > > ??? > >> \setupinteraction[state=start] >> \showframe\showgrid >> \starttext >> \blank[force, 10em] >> \section{Move comment above this heading} >> \startparagraph[setups=tinytiny]

Re: [NTG-context] margin comment above heading

\blank[force, 10em] \section{Move comment above this heading} \startparagraph[setups=tinytiny] \dontleavehmode \comment[location={rightmargin}, color=orange] {comment} \stopparagraph \stoptext Is there a way to move the comment above the heading

[NTG-context] margin comment above heading

Dear list, I have the following sample: \startsetups[tinytiny] \setupwhitespace[-2em] \setupbodyfont[0.01pt] \setupinterlinespace[1sp] \stopsetups \setupinteraction[state=start] \showframe\showgrid \starttext \blank[force, 10em] \section{Move comment above

Re: [NTG-context] issue with \comment

On 6/16/20 8:00 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Pablo Rodriguez schrieb am 16.06.2020 um 19:20: >> [...] >> I think it might be a bug. Could anyone confirm this? > > Why is everything a bug? > > Some elements like margin blocks or register entries need an anchor. Sorry, Wolfgang, I discovered

Re: [NTG-context] issue with \comment

Pablo Rodriguez schrieb am 16.06.2020 um 19:20: Dear list, when trying to report another issue, I found the following one (using latest from 2020.06.12 17:43): \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext a\contextversion \comment[location={rightmargin}]{comment} \stoptext

[NTG-context] issue with \comment

Dear list, when trying to report another issue, I found the following one (using latest from 2020.06.12 17:43): \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext a\contextversion \comment[location={rightmargin}]{comment} \stoptext For some strange reason, \comment isn’t added when

Re: [NTG-context] issues with \comment

howframe \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext \comment[location=leftmargin,space=yes,buffer=abc]{} \type{\comment[location=leftmargin,space=yes,buffer=abc]{}} \blank[2*big] \comment[location=rightmargin,space=yes,buffer=abc]{} \type{\comment[location=rightmargin,s

Re: [NTG-context] issues with \comment

Pablo Rodriguez 6. Juli 2018 um 11:14 Dear list, [...] Locations for leftedge, rightedge and text don’t seem to work (in Acrobat Reader, SumatraPDF and Evince). By default the leftedge and rightedge areas are disabled because they have a width of 0pt and even when you

[NTG-context] issues with \comment

Dear list, I have the following sample: \setupinteraction[state=start] \setupcomment[location=inmargin, color=darkred] \showframe \startbuffer[abc] \input zapf \stopbuffer \setuptype[option=tex] \starttext \comment[space=yes,buffer=abc]{} \type{\comment

[NTG-context] comment colors in \typebuffers

Hans, I have the following sample: \starttext \startTEXpage[offset=1em] \startTEX This is text. % and this is a comment \stopTEX \startXML This is text. \stopXML \startLUA if code=="code" then --this is a comment --[[ and this is a

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

x-file As a thumbrule one can sum the rule up that *inside* field text comment chars should be input according the tex rule for the field *type*. That means that normal textfields should use \%, while url's and other verbatim-like field can use %. > We made the choice NOT to remain *strictl

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

On 2017-05-08 21:40, Henri Menke wrote: That is simply not true! Content inside ConTeXt buffers is as verbatim as reading an external file. Try \typebuffer instead of \getbuffer your example below and observe that the comment sign is perfectly preserved. I am sorry. You are, of course

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:15 -0400, Rik Kabel wrote: > On 2017-05-08 17:44, Henri Menke wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > The percent character in btx field is taken as a comment characters > > which leads to the rest of the field being discarded.  In the MWE &g

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

On 2017-05-08 17:44, Henri Menke wrote: Dear list, The percent character in btx field is taken as a comment characters which leads to the rest of the field being discarded. In the MWE below, the URL is cut off at the % sign and everything after it is lost. Cheers, Henri --- \startbuffer

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

 In my opinion this > behaviour should be adopted by ConTeXt. From BibTeXing: 7. For Scribe compatibility, the database files allow an @COMMENT command; it’s not really needed because BibTEX allows in the database files any comment that’s not within an entry. If you want to comment out an en

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 16:27 -0600, Alan Braslau wrote: > Of course, you have to escape the percent character if you do not > want > it to be interpreted as a comment... however, in the example below, > the > URL does not get rendered properly, nor does using \letterpercent, so >

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

Of course, you have to escape the percent character if you do not want it to be interpreted as a comment... however, in the example below, the URL does not get rendered properly, nor does using \letterpercent, so there is something that we need to fix in our treatment of URLs. \startbuffer

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

2017-05-08 23:44 GMT+02:00 Henri Menke <henrime...@gmail.com>: > The percent character in btx field is taken as a comment characters > which leads to the rest of the field being discarded. In the MWE > below, the URL is cut off at the % sign and everything after it is > los

[NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

Dear list, The percent character in btx field is taken as a comment characters which leads to the rest of the field being discarded.  In the MWE below, the URL is cut off at the % sign and everything after it is lost. Cheers, Henri --- \startbuffer[references] @misc{kraft,   author = "

Re: [NTG-context] "\" in text from "\comment"

On 12/21/2016 10:51 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 12/21/2016 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> Text from comment reads "\Ux {5C}ConTeXt\Ux {5C} is great". It should >> read "\ConTeXt\ is great". >> >> Am I missing something or

Re: [NTG-context] "\" in text from "\comment"

:*} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{doc|p|code}{xml:*} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{pre/code}{xml:pre:code} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize} \startxmlsetups xml:doc \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:pre:code \comment[symbol=Key, location

[NTG-context] "\" in text from "\comment"

:*} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{pre/code}{xml:pre:code} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize} \startxmlsetups xml:doc \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:pre:code \comment[symbol=Key, location=inmargin, color=yellow

[NTG-context] bug with backslash in comment (xml)?

}{xml:pre:code} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize} \startxmlsetups xml:doc \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:pre:code \comment[symbol=Key, location=inmargin, color=yellow]{\xmlflush{#1}}\xmlprettyprint{#1}{tex

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 2/24/2016 10:01 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: And SumatraPDF has this particular feature implemented. currently sumatra is behaving quite weird with these zoom features because using named destinations has no advantage when ther eis no view and not all hyperlinked constructs have views

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

. But footnotes (endnotes, linenotes, index references and similar ones) have destination links generated by lpdf-epa.lua. I may be misreading your comment from line 85 in lpdf-epa.lua. But this is what I get after grepping for "/Fit" in tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/ from the beta.

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 02/24/2016 10:50 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Pablo Rodriguez 24. Februar 2016 um 10:01 >> [...] >> These options are totally new (and previously unknown to me). I’m afraid >> I wasn’t able to find them in the ConTeXt command list >> (http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf). >

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

But footnotes (endnotes, linenotes, index references and similar ones) have destination links generated by lpdf-epa.lua. I may be misreading your comment from line 85 in lpdf-epa.lua. But this is what I get after grepping for "/Fit" in tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/ from the beta. Wouldn’t

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

Pablo Rodriguez 24. Februar 2016 um 10:01 On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/23/2016 12:21 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Well, Sumatra works fine with this concrete feature (at least, this is my experience). And mupdf is the only exception in this regard. hm,

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 02/23/2016 11:07 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > Just speculating, could one distribute a PDF that would be like a book > with many parts? I know that Hans is not a fan of part, but I wonder > how this is handled? I doubt that any viewers handle prefixed page > numbers properly. I just tried looking

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/23/2016 12:21 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > >> Well, Sumatra works fine with this concrete feature (at least, this is >> my experience). And mupdf is the only exception in this regard. > > hm, sumatra uses the mupdf engine Well, this is more

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:30:25 + Christoph Reller wrote: > (btw, footnotes will always be sort of a pain as they are > rendered in special ways, but footnotes should be forbidden anyway; > if a doc is also for screen endnotes are way better) > > I agree with you

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:54:00 +0100 Martin Schröder wrote: > 2016-02-22 21:40 GMT+01:00 Alan BRASLAU : > > This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to > > contain both versions? > > Adobe introduced something called "portfolios" in PDF

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

Hi Hans, First and foremost: Thank you for uploading the Beta! This solves the problem I have reported with \reference and focus=standard: https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg79620.html On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:00 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 2/23/2016 12:21

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 2/23/2016 12:21 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Well, Sumatra works fine with this concrete feature (at least, this is my experience). And mupdf is the only exception in this regard. hm, sumatra uses the mupdf engine Besides that, all other links use named destinations, so why are they so

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 02/22/2016 08:13 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> >> I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following >> code: > > btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should > make two versions, one for screen, one for

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 02/22/2016 08:08 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> The regression is that \setupinteraction[focus=standard] doesn’t work >> with hyperlink in table of contents for chapter in betas from 2016.02.15 >> 10:26. > > a bit too complex example Many

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

2016-02-22 21:40 GMT+01:00 Alan BRASLAU : > This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to contain > both versions? Adobe introduced something called "portfolios" in PDF 1.7 or later, but I doubt that they work with non-Adobe viewers. Best Martin

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:13:27 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should > make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes > should be pop ups or roll-overs but the free acrobat alternatives are > not clever

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following code: btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes should be pop ups or

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following code: \setupinteraction[state=start, focus=standard] \enabledirectives[references.border] \setupinteractionscreen[option=fit]

[NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

Hans, I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following code: \setupinteraction[state=start, focus=standard] \enabledirectives[references.border] \setupinteractionscreen[option=fit] \setupnote[footnote][way=bytext, location=text] \starttext

[NTG-context] mathml and xml-comment

Shouldn't mathml ignore the xml comment in the second example below? Hans van der Meer mathmlproduction.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add

[NTG-context] comment inside mathml

Sorry if this question reaches you twice, but the first time I used an email address not registered with this newsgroup.Shouldn't mathml ignore the xml comment in the second example below?Hans van der Meer mathmlproduction.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

Re: [NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

Am Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:41:55 +0100 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: in fact you get: \startTest Eins, zwei, drei \stopTest because of the comment and we ignore all till the end of the first line I still don't understand it. This works: \startTest Eins, zwei, drei \stopTest

Re: [NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

On 1/21/2014 3:39 PM, Joshua Krämer wrote: Am Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:41:55 +0100 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: in fact you get: \startTest Eins, zwei, drei \stopTest because of the comment and we ignore all till the end of the first line I still don't understand it. This works

Re: [NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:51:17 +0100 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: has to do with catcode changes so % is no longer % Thanks for the hint. I have tried to do it like that (from Mojca Miklavec's My Way): \usemodule[database] \unprotect \startsetups Data:unix \catcode`\%=\@@comment

Re: [NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

...@wxs.nl: has to do with catcode changes so % is no longer % Thanks for the hint. I have tried to do it like that (from Mojca Miklavec's My Way): \usemodule[database] \unprotect \startsetups Data:unix \catcode`\%=\@@comment \stopsetups \protect \defineseparatedlist [Data] [ separator=tab

Re: [NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

Am Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:19:43 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com: You can add “commentchar=\letterpercent” to your separatedlist definition which will make % the character for comments, the setups hack isn’t necessary. Thank you, I have added it to the Wiki. Kind

[NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

Dear list, if there is a comment after \startseparatedlist[...] from the database module, context fails. Thus, this example in the wiki doesn't work: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/M-database Minimal example: \usemodule[database] \defineseparatedlist[Test] [ before=\bTABLE

Re: [NTG-context] Comment after \startseparatedlist[...]

On 1/20/2014 9:02 PM, Joshua Krämer wrote: Dear list, if there is a comment after \startseparatedlist[...] from the database module, context fails. Thus, this example in the wiki doesn't work: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/M-database Minimal example: \usemodule[database] \defineseparatedlist

Re: [NTG-context] flowchart: \comment does not work with background

; fill p withcolor green ; \stopuniqueMPgraphic \defineoverlay[mytest][\uniqueMPgraphic{mytest}] \starttext \framed[background=mytest]{this works} \startFLOWchart[test] \startFLOWcell \name{test} \text{test} \connection[lr]{test} % \comment[t:0.5]{\framed{this works}} \comment[t

Re: [NTG-context] flowchart: \comment does not work with background

On Sat, Oct 05 2013, Hans Hagen wrote: nested mp in mp ... never seen that .. so it needs some work (if wanted at all) It would be nice. I would like to make fancy comments on connections. Do you think that you can make it possible? TIA, -- Peter

Re: [NTG-context] flowchart: \comment does not work with background

On 10/5/2013 2:45 PM, Peter Münster wrote: On Sat, Oct 05 2013, Hans Hagen wrote: nested mp in mp ... never seen that .. so it needs some work (if wanted at all) It would be nice. I would like to make fancy comments on connections. Do you think that you can make it possible? sure but as

[NTG-context] flowchart: \comment does not work with background

\defineoverlay[mytest][\uniqueMPgraphic{mytest}] \starttext \framed[background=mytest]{this works} \startFLOWchart[test] \startFLOWcell \name{test} \text{test} \connection[lr]{test} % \comment[t:0.5]{\framed{this works}} \comment[t:0.5]{\framed[background=mytest]{bla

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

On 14-5-2012 15:59, Philipp Gesang wrote: + leadingcomment ok -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 |

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

. } \starttext \dosomething {foo} \stoptext Fails here with: to be read again c l.2 \def\dosomething#c ontent{%%%= fine with “#1” Removing the comment, closing the group

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

{%%%= fine with “#1” Removing the comment, closing the group or reverting to TEX-style argument numbering makes this behavior disappear. Indeed there are some limitations to the parser. I'll note it down as low priority issue. Would it be possible to modify the comment pattern so that it accept

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

l.2 \def\dosomething#c ontent{%%%= fine with “#1” Removing the comment, closing the group or reverting to TEX-style argument numbering makes this behavior disappear. Indeed there are some limitations to the parser. I'll note it down as low priority issue

[NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

Fails here with: to be read again c l.2 \def\dosomething#c ontent{%%% = fine with “#1” Removing the comment, closing the group or reverting to TEX-style argument numbering

[NTG-context] letter module: error with comment

Hello Wolfgang, this was atricky one to track down: If in my first line after \startletter I’ve a comment containing another \startletter, I get: \stoptext ! File ended while scanning use of \buff_gobble. system tex error on line 0 in file : File ended while scanning use

Re: [NTG-context] letter module: error with comment

Am 05.02.2012 um 23:33 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: Hello Wolfgang, this was atricky one to track down: If in my first line after \startletter I’ve a comment containing another \startletter, I get: This is a normal behavior of buffers in MkIV, you need always a balanced start/stop pair

Re: [NTG-context] Comment on new Page Design Chapter for new manual.

Hi John, On 01/27/2011 11:41 PM, John Culleton wrote: The question of page dimensions can be very confusing for the raw beginner. I suggest the something like the following as a lead in: Thanks, duly noted. I'll keep this in mind for the next revision. Best wishes, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] Comment on new Page Design Chapter for new manual.

On 27-1-2011 11:41, John Culleton wrote: The question of page dimensions can be very confusing for the raw beginner. I suggest the something like the following as a lead in: --- For a printed page we really have to deal with three different

[NTG-context] Comment on new Page Design Chapter for new manual.

The question of page dimensions can be very confusing for the raw beginner. I suggest the something like the following as a lead in: --- For a printed page we really have to deal with three different sets of dimensions. The body of the text

[NTG-context] Chart module: comment not visible!?

Hi, I wanted to try the chart module to build some flow diagrams, and tried the example (digital signal processing!) at contextgarden. Unfortunately, the text inside the rectangular shapes shows up properly, but no sign of any comments visible in the generated pdf-file! I use ConTeXt ver:

Re: [NTG-context] Chart module: comment not visible!?

On Monday 06 December 2010 11:09:42 Verhaag, G.C.H.M. wrote: Hi, I wanted to try the chart module to build some flow diagrams, and tried the example (digital signal processing!) at contextgarden. Unfortunately, the text inside the rectangular shapes shows up properly, but no sign of any

Re: [NTG-context] Chart module: comment not visible!?

Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Monday 06 December 2010 11:09:42 Verhaag, G.C.H.M. wrote: Hi, I wanted to try the chart module to build some flow diagrams, and tried the example (digital signal processing!) at contextgarden. Unfortunately, the text inside the rectangular shapes shows up properly,

Re: [NTG-context] \comment broken

On 3-12-2010 6:33, Andreas Harder wrote: Hi, the compilation of \starttext test \comment{test} \stoptext stops (at least for me) with: ! LuaTeX error ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/lpdf-wid.lua:124: attempt to call field 'collect' (a nil value) buffer functions have been

[NTG-context] Chart comment not rendering!

Hi, I wanted to try the chart module to build some flow diagrams, and tried the example (digital signal processing!) at contextgarden. Unfortunately, the text inside the rectangular shapes shows up properly, but no sign of any comments visible in the generated pdf-file! I use ConTeXt ver:

[NTG-context] \comment broken

Hi, the compilation of \starttext test \comment{test} \stoptext stops (at least for me) with: ! LuaTeX error ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/lpdf-wid.lua:124: attempt to call field 'collect' (a nil value) I'm using the latest beta. Greeting Andreas

[NTG-context] Room for comment on the backside of form

a default? Because most of the time it will all the time be the same value. With this setup the pagination has to be done completely manually. Not very handy. Is there a way that when a new page is generated, the comment page is inserted before the new page? And also after the last? An example

Re: [NTG-context] Room for comment on the backside of form

Am 07.09.2010 um 14:26 schrieb Cecil Westerhof: I am still trying to make a useful environment for paper feedback forms. One thing I am trying to do now, is to but lines on the back for when someone needs more space to give the feedback. For this I made the following macro:

Re: [NTG-context] Room for comment on the backside of form

Op dinsdag 7 sep 2010 15:35 CEST schreef Wolfgang Schuster: I am still trying to make a useful environment for paper feedback forms. One thing I am trying to do now, is to but lines on the back for when someone needs more space to give the feedback. For this I made the following macro:

Re: [NTG-context] Room for comment on the backside of form

Am 07.09.2010 um 17:03 schrieb Cecil Westerhof: Op dinsdag 7 sep 2010 15:35 CEST schreef Wolfgang Schuster: I am still trying to make a useful environment for paper feedback forms. One thing I am trying to do now, is to but lines on the back for when someone needs more space to give the

[NTG-context] comment support in pdf

Any way to make a pdf file support comment? ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] comment support in pdf

2009/5/20, Bill Long longwei...@sohu.com: Any way to make a pdf file support comment? No. Ask google, please. Best Martin ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

in vim(rc): function! CommentTeX() map - :s/^/% /CR:nohlsearchCR map _ :s/^\s*% \=//CR:nohlsearchCR set comments=:% endfunction autocmd FileType tex call CommentTeX() This way, in visual you select the part of the document you want to comment, then press - and, voila, you get

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

\starthiding ... \stophiding Ah, never seen that. Myself I normally use \startmode[obsolete] % or the like \stopmode Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)

[NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

Hi, Guess this is (Plain) TeX stuff - haven't found the answer... How do you comment several lines at once, instead of prefixing each line with the % sign ? Alan ___ If your question is of interest to others as well

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

AFAIK it is not possible direclty. I've asked it once. Should be in archive Best -a- On 2 Jul 2008, at 15:05, Alan Stone wrote: Hi, Guess this is (Plain) TeX stuff - haven't found the answer... How do you comment several lines at once, instead of prefixing each line with the % sign

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

2008/7/2 Alan Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How do you comment several lines at once, instead of prefixing each line with the % sign ? \iffalse \fi Best Martin ___ If your question is of interest to others as well

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

In ConTeXt you should be able to say: \starthiding -- this stuff will not be processed -- \stophiding Hans van der Meer On 2 jul 2008, at 15:05, Alan Stone wrote: Hi, Guess this is (Plain) TeX stuff - haven't found the answer... How do you comment several lines at once, instead

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

2008/7/2 Alan Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Guess this is (Plain) TeX stuff - haven't found the answer... How do you comment several lines at once, instead of prefixing each line with the % sign ? in vim :A,Bs/^/% A=start line B=end line -- Diego Depaoli

Re: [NTG-context] how to comment several lines at once ?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Alan Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Guess this is (Plain) TeX stuff - haven't found the answer... How do you comment several lines at once, instead of prefixing each line with the % sign ? \starthiding ... \stophiding Regards Wolfgang

[NTG-context] How to include unicode characters in a comment?

Hi When I'm using === \setupinteraction [state=start] \enableregime [utf] \usemodule [chi-00] \starttext \startcomment[中文] 中文 \stopcomment 中文 \stoptext === and use Adobe Reader v7 to view the output file. The comment only shows

[NTG-context] comment flush?

Hello, There's a strange behaviour with comments when using \startcomment...\stopcomment. In some cases the comments are skipped. The comment always appears with \comment{...}. Here is a summary of the tests I've done: Case OK: comment starting a paragraph Case KO: comment at the end