On 3/16/2021 3:11 PM, Jacob Kauffmann wrote:
Dear list,
lmtx draws a fraction line in \binom{n}{k},
ConTeXt ver: 2021.02.23 17:47 LMTX fmt: 2021.2.26 int: english/english
The same happens with {n \choose k}.
The other version I tested draws it correctly (without the bar
Dear list,
lmtx draws a fraction line in \binom{n}{k},
ConTeXt ver: 2021.02.23 17:47 LMTX fmt: 2021.2.26 int: english/english
The same happens with {n \choose k}.
The other version I tested draws it correctly (without the bar):
ConTeXt ver: 2019.03.21 21:39 MKII fmt: 2019.11.14
On 4/22/2014 1:53 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
I have been trying out the newish
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=mp], which has been very nice
because of the fine control over the radical sign.
I've noticed that it crunches the denominator in \sqrt{a\over b}
For example:
\starttext
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
indeed. this is what (sort of) happens in case of a plugged in renderer:
\sqrt{#1} - ...\mathstylehbox{#1}... - ...\hbox{\stylecommand #1}...
when #a = a \over b the style gets applied to the a only as \over
creates two (pseudo) groups i.e. the \over
I have been trying out the newish
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=mp], which has been very nice
because of the fine control over the radical sign.
I've noticed that it crunches the denominator in \sqrt{a\over b}
For example:
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\sqrt{k\over m}\quad
-tuned example is obviously nicer.
it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack a solution but prefer not
to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
Not a font issue. ConTeXt is using the fraction slash (which is intended
to be used with vulgar fractions) not the regular slash
On 10/26/2013 3:53 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Unicode sure makes things easy:
U+002F / SOLIDUS SLASH
U+2044 ⁄ FRACTION SLASH
U+2215 ∕ DIVISION SLASH
U+FF0F ／ FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS FULLWIDTH SLASH
Of course, we key in ascii / (0x2f).
From how these display
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:23:43 +0900
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack a solution but prefer
not to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
Hans
So, who can fix the font issue?
(tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/xits/xits-math.otf)
Alan
Am 25.10.2013 um 10:08 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:23:43 +0900
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
it looks like a font issue to me .. i could hack a solution but prefer
not to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
Hans
So, who can fix the
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:14:45 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wolfgang.schus...@gmail.com wrote:
So, who can fix the font issue?
(tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/xits/xits-math.otf)
https://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math/issues
OK, reported to Khaled.
Thanks
Alan
not
to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
Not a font issue. ConTeXt is using the fraction slash (which is intended
to be used with vulgar fractions) not the regular slash.
Regards,
Khaled
___
If your
a solution but prefer not
to do that (the less exceptions we have the better)
Not a font issue. ConTeXt is using the fraction slash (which is intended
to be used with vulgar fractions) not the regular slash.
the problem is that (last time i looked into this) all math fonts had it
differently
On 10/24/2013 2:46 PM, H. Özoguz wrote:
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think?
Thanks.
I think you are right, I don't know if this is really desired, but I
don't think so. Escpecially one gets problems
Hello,
Using the dejavu font, inline math fractions (e.g. $a/b$) look to me to
be spaced too tightly. Below are some minimal examples:
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think?
Thanks.
Alan
On 4 juin 2013, at 21:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
[…]
ok, a new feature for SB:
Thanks hans! Very nice feature. Wikified in
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/fraction
but the output on the wiki is not correct since ConTeXt there is mkii.
Best regards: OK
Hoi Sander,
Sander wrote:
This gives basically three equally long division lines
The fraction line of a nested fractions is in fact shorter than that
of its parent fraction, but by a very small amout. This seems to be
the standard behaviour -- I tried the formula in LaTeX, and the
difference
On 6/4/2013 3:04 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
Hoi Sander,
Sander wrote:
This gives basically three equally long division lines
The fraction line of a nested fractions is in fact shorter than that
of its parent fraction, but by a very small amout. This seems to be
the standard behaviour -- I
Hi,
How can I make the subfraction in the denominator of a fraction appear
smaller even though the nominator is very small? This gives basically
three equally long division lines:
\startfomula
\frac{\mu_{Z}}{\frac{\sqrt{\VAR{Z}}{\sqrt{N_{\text{segments}
\stopformula
Sorry, I meant to write numerator. (In Dutch it is teller/noemer ;))
On 03-06-13 19:40, Sander Maijers wrote:
Hi,
How can I make the subfraction in the denominator of a fraction appear
smaller even though the nominator is very small? This gives basically
three equally long division lines
Taco, Mojca,
Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
to make the main fraction bar wider?
There is a genfrac command in amslatex. Anything similar in Context?
On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:00 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
David Arnold wrote:
All,
How can I extend
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
Taco, Mojca,
Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
to make the main fraction bar wider?
There is a genfrac command in amslatex. Anything similar in Context?
m-newmat.tex defines genfrac.
\usemodule[newmat]
\def
Aditya,
Thanks. You are very helpful.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
Taco, Mojca,
Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
to make the main fraction bar wider?
There is a genfrac command in amslatex
Question. Is this genfrac identical to the one in ams definitions?
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
Taco, Mojca,
Thanks for the response on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
to make the main fraction bar wider
on lengthening the main fraction bar? Any way
to make the main fraction bar wider?
There is a genfrac command in amslatex. Anything similar in Context?
m-newmat.tex defines genfrac.
\usemodule[newmat]
\def\bigfrac{\genfrac{}{}{2pt}\displaystyle}
\starttext
\startformula
\bigfrac{100}{200
David Arnold wrote:
All,
How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
making it a tad longer?
Just add a bit of whitespace to the right and left:
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}
{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}\,}
You may want to add a \vphantom
On 7/2/06, David Arnold wrote:
All,
How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
making it a tad longer?
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
I don't know what \dfrac should be (I assumed \let
All,
How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
making it a tad longer?
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
27 matches
Mail list logo
