} +
>\overparent{x} +
> \overbrace{x} +
>\overbrace{i}
>}
>
> \stopTEXpage
>
>
> This time with fancy radical bars, fraction bars, vertical bars, over and
> underbars etc.
>
> Hans
>
>
} +
\overbrace{x} +
\overbrace{i}
}
\stopTEXpage
This time with fancy radical bars, fraction bars, vertical bars, over
and underbars etc.
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Please consider the attached example – some of the “barring” macros are
defunct already for a while, some more within a TABLE:
\underbar works, but not in TABLE
\underbarsworks
\underdot doesn’t work
\underdotsdoesn’t work
\underdashdoesn’t work
\underdashes doesn’t work
Am 30.11.21 um 16:17 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
Another question: what do you mean with a dy-shift version?
Nested bars have a parameter ‘dy’ which controls the vertical shifts
needed to make sure that they do not overlap. Text backgrounds do not
have that option at all.
i've
On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains both the
bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that
definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I
On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:38, Denis Maier via ntg-context
wrote:
Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of
course...
I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > Another question: what do you mean with a dy-shift version?
>
> Nested bars have a parameter ‘dy’ which controls the vertical shifts needed
> to make sure that they do not overlap. Text backgrounds do not have that
> option at
s Christian (UB)
> Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] double underbars
>
>
>
> > On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:38, Denis Maier via ntg-context cont...@ntg.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of
> course...
> >
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Taco Hoekwater
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2021 14:19
>> An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
>> Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB)
>> Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] double underbars
>>
>>
>>
>
Am 30.11.21 um 14:19 schrieb Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context:
I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.
YES, #metoo
As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside
\overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations
mailing list for ConTeXt users
> Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB)
> Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] double underbars
>
>
>
> > On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context cont...@ntg.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > for a current project I
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars.
>
> - A normal underbar
> - A dotted underbar
> - A combination of both
>
> Is there a way to combine t
Hi,
for a current project I'll need different variants of underbars.
- A normal underbar
- A dotted underbar
- A combination of both
Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above
the normal bar.
This is not working
> On 24 Nov 2020, at 22:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Bruce Horrocks wrote:
>
>> The following is giving me a section title with triple underbars instead of
>> single.
>>
>> \definehead [Heading] [section]
>> \setuphead
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Bruce Horrocks wrote:
> The following is giving me a section title with triple underbars instead of
> single.
>
> \definehead [Heading] [section]
> \setuphead [Heading] [style={\underbar}]
Change this to:
\setuphead [Heading] [textcommand={\underbar}
The following is giving me a section title with triple underbars instead of
single.
\definehead [Heading] [section]
\setuphead [Heading] [style={\underbar}]
\starttext
\Heading{First level section heading}
\underbar{This is single underlined as expected}
\stoptext
(Same with \startHeading
{\NC #2 \NC dummy \NC John Doe \NC #3 \NC\NR }
\define\myTOCbefore{
\starttabulate[|pw(8.75cm)|l|lw(4.2cm)|r|]
\NC \underbars{Title}
\NC \underbars{Subject}
\NC \underbars{Author}
\NC \underbars{Page}
\NC\NR
}
\define\myTOCafter{%
\stoptabulate }
\starttext
\title{Tabulated
}
\define\myTOCbefore{
\starttabulate[|pw(8.75cm)|l|lw(4.2cm)|r|]
\NC \underbars{Title}
\NC \underbars{Subject}
\NC \underbars{Author}
\NC \underbars{Page}
\NC\NR
}
\define\myTOCafter{%
\stoptabulate }
\starttext
\title{Tabulated Table of Contents}
\placelist[chapter]
\startchapter[title
cross page boundaries.
I have found three ways of doing this: I would like to know which is
best practice, and also the more lua context document fashion.
1- Using \startbar[underbar] \input zapf \stopbar as described p. 39
of hybrid.pdf.
Use this one, unless the underbars are indequate
as described p. 39
of hybrid.pdf.
Use this one, unless the underbars are indequate, as was the case for the OP
of the TeX.SX question.
This one is very easy to use, but I liked the rounded corners of the example.
Also I want it to fill the whole background, as it is the case with
\definetextbackground
\underbars{Without setscript:}
Alphabet\hskip 2cm text
漢字\hskip 2cm 文書
\setscript[nihongo]
\underbars{With setscript:}
Alphabet\hskip 2cm text
漢字\hskip 2cm 文書
\stoptext
% end
It's because spaces are stripped and there is currently no distinction
or mention).
However, it is interesting to note that \hfill does work in both cases with
standard alphabet text.
%
\usemodule[simplefonts]
\setmainfont[ipaexm]% using a font having Japanese characters
\starttext
\underbars{Without setscript:}
Alphabet\hskip 2cm
tal que \startcolor[middlered]\underbars{la cinquena part d'aquest nombre}\stopcolor\ menys tres és igual al \processwords{doble del nombre} més \setupunderbar[alternative=a,rulecolor=middlegreen,rulethickness=2pt]\startcolor[red]\underbars{aquest mateix nombre}\stopcolor
\stopframedtext}
\eTD
Datuma 10. kolovoza 2010. 00:22 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl je napisao/la:
fixed in next beta
Thank you!
--
Vedran Miletić
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
Hi,
it seems like \underbar acts like \underbars in latest beta MkIV.
2010.05.24 from TL2010 works fine.
Regards,
--
Vedran Miletić
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
On 9-8-2010 2:01, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Hi,
it seems like \underbar acts like \underbars in latest beta MkIV.
2010.05.24 from TL2010 works fine.
example needed
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Datuma 9. kolovoza 2010. 14:32 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl je napisao/la:
On 9-8-2010 2:01, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Hi,
it seems like \underbar acts like \underbars in latest beta MkIV.
2010.05.24 from TL2010 works fine.
example needed
Perhaps this helps: http://www.inf.uniri.hr/~vmiletic
On 9-8-2010 10:11, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Datuma 9. kolovoza 2010. 14:32 Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl je napisao/la:
On 9-8-2010 2:01, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Hi,
it seems like \underbar acts like \underbars in latest beta MkIV.
2010.05.24 from TL2010 works fine.
example needed
Perhaps
is also under/over that space. Is this
intended? Example:
\starttext
\underbar{b} \overbar{b} \underbar{b}
$\underbar{b} = \overbar{b} = \underbar{b}$
\stoptext
A fix for this would be to use \underbars{b} or \overbars{b} instead, btw.
Best wishes,
Stefan
In the (old) ConTeXT manual one finds for \underbar{} an example giving underlining of its whole argument. In contrast \underbars{} should not underline the spaces, as demonstrated by the example given.However, the actual behaviour seems just the opposite. Or has the role of these macros changed
On 10-3-2010 14:39, Hans van der Meer wrote:
In the (old) ConTeXT manual one finds for \underbar{} an example giving
underlining of its whole argument. In contrast \underbars{} should not underline
the spaces, as demonstrated by the example given.
However, the actual behaviour seems just
underbars the spaces even?
\usemodule[educat]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setuptextbackground
[answerarea]
[framecolor=black,
rulethickness=\linewidth,
background=,
alternative=1]
\starttext
text \answerspace [n=10] { } text
text \answerspace [m=10] { } text
\stoptext
Wolfgang
}
How can I get that \underbar underbars the spaces even?
\usemodule[educat]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setuptextbackground
[answerarea]
[framecolor=black,
rulethickness=\linewidth,
background=,
alternative=1]
\starttext
text \answerspace [n=10] { } text
text \answerspace [m=10
Hi,
I just want to do \underbar{\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } for doing
something like: __ . When I do that ConTeXt does not
underbar me the spaces. The same applies for \underbar{\space \space
\space }
How can I get that \underbar underbars the spaces even?
Thanks
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Xan wrote:
I just want to do \underbar{\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } for doing something
like: __ . When I do that ConTeXt does not underbar me the
spaces. The same applies for \underbar{\space \space \space }
How can I get that \underbar underbars
Hi,
In the underneath example, how do you get each word replaced by an underline
?
Or, if not possible, underlined word groups with correct underline breaks
for multi-line phrases.
\def\UnderlineA#1%
{\underbars{#1}}
\def\UnderlineB#1%
{\underbars{\phantom{#1}}}
%{\underbar{\phantom{#1
]
\typefile[name]{text}
\underbar{text}
\underbars{text text}
# \unexpanded
# \unprotect
# \unprotected
\useblocks[names][names]
\usecommands{text}
\usedirectory[names|reset]
\useencoding[names]
\useexternaldocument[name][file][text]
\useexternalfigure[name][file][options]
\useexternalfile[name][name][file
, as well as \underbars,
\overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi.
You mentioned that \underbar (and presumably the others I mentioned
above) are macros taking arguments e.g. \acommand{...}. However
presumably something like \midaligned{...} is also a macro requiring
an argument
with \underbar, as well as \underbars,
\overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi.
You mentioned that \underbar (and presumably the others I mentioned
above) are macros taking arguments e.g. \acommand{...}. However
presumably something like \midaligned{...} is also a macro
requiring
Hans Hagen wrote:
Michael Wigston wrote:
1. This def of u does nothing ...
\defineXMLgrouped [u] \underbar
\defineXMLargument[u]{\underbar}
underbar is not a font switch but a macro that takes an argument
Hans,
Thanks, that works fine with \underbar,
as well as \underbars
problems implementing
the following commands: -
\underbar,
\underbars, \overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi
I was expecting that they would all
easily be defined using the \defineXMLgrouped [name] {command} element
mapping. There is probably something very simple that I have
of impossible to do
\underbars (plural) at least split at word boundaries
anyhow, underbar is from the typewriter time and just a poor mans emphasis
thing
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
=#2,depth=\underbarparameter\c!bottomoffset,color=\underbarparameter\c!color}}}
\protect
% usage:
\setupunderbar[alternative=x,bottomoffset=1ex,color=red]
\startitemize
\item test: \underbars[color=blue]{how are you?}
\item test: \underbars{how are you?}
\item test: \underbars{how are you
ADE}[URL(context)]
\setupinteraction
[state=start,
color=black,
style={\tf\underbars}]
\setupunderbar[alternative=c, rulecolor=blue] % underdots
Footnote numbers are interaction links, too. I don't know how to handle
them different.
But you can switch off footnote interaction somehow AFAIK
44 matches
Mail list logo
