2008/11/4 Christopher Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The re-use of name logo is at best bad form...
Its a sad move, they could use something else,
I suggest them publicfonts as the name :)
We need developers!
Yes he certainly does,
:) All the best, as mentioned in mails above.
--
H
IRC :
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
Is the name a problem, project identity-wise?
I do foresee general confusion, but I won't argue over that till I'm
blue in the face. I have better things to do. I just hope that
initiator of the second project is
Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
I also hope there will be a reasonable resolution to this with no bad
consequences for the momentum of the OFLB.
The re-use of name logo is at best bad form...
A breach of copyright :-)?
He says:
We felt a split, and/or rebellion was needed.
although, as far as I
2008/11/4 Christopher Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The re-use of name logo is at best bad form...
A breach of copyright :-)?
Well, trademark :-)
We need developers!
Yes he certainly does,
LOL
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
http://www.openfontlibrary.com/
:-(
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://www.openfontlibrary.com/
*shrugs shoulders*
Well, the best of luck to them.
Indeed. May the best project win. Or peaceful coexistence ensue.
Is the name a problem, project identity-wise?
- Rob.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://www.openfontlibrary.com/
*shrugs shoulders*
Well, the best of luck to them.
Alexandre
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
Is the name a problem, project identity-wise?
I do foresee general confusion, but I won't argue over that till I'm
blue in the face. I have better things to do. I just hope that
initiator of the second project is a reasonable person who won't put
Good you got them...why do you have them in inframe?
The best would be for you to update the DNS on them to be the same
ame Server:NS1.AUTH.OSUOSL.ORG
Name Server:NS2.AUTH.OSUOSL.ORG
Then, we can file a ticket to OSUOSL.org to make them work properly. Can
you do that on those two domains.
2008/10/30 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The best would be for you to update the DNS on them to be the same
Name Server:NS1.AUTH.OSUOSL.ORG
Name Server:NS2.AUTH.OSUOSL.ORG
why in frame for the .com?
It just works that way!...(assuming the .org site is working)
I've had the .net one pointing to the
2008/10/29 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some domain speculators have been sending me emails, trying to sell me
openfontlibrary.com, so...
I've just bought the .com version of the openfontlibrary domain name,
pointing it to openfontlibrary.org.
(I own the .net, that's why they've been offering it to
Some domain speculators have been sending me emails, trying to sell me
openfontlibrary.com, so...
I've just bought the .com version of the openfontlibrary domain name,
pointing it to openfontlibrary.org.
(I own the .net, that's why they've been offering it to me.)
FF
**Play
Good you got them...why do you have them in inframe?
The best would be for you to update the DNS on them to be the same
ame Server:NS1.AUTH.OSUOSL.ORG
Name Server:NS2.AUTH.OSUOSL.ORG
Then, we can file a ticket to OSUOSL.org to make them work properly. Can
you do that on those two domains.
In
13 matches
Mail list logo
