Marek Vasut wrote:
So it turns out (by reading Freescale iMX515 errata), ENGcm09395 to
be exact
Please mention this within the fixup function.
But that being the case, I'd prefer to make an incremental patch on
top of the patches I submitted.
Please don't, since some of the former patches
I think caring about the variant should strongly
be avoided. Use the ROM table by default. Only in
the case of a broken ROM table should we (a) emit
a message, then (b) work around the brokenness.
Such working-around might care about variant, if wecan't come up with a simple
heuristic fix.
-
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:59 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
I think caring about the variant should strongly
be avoided. Use the ROM table by default. Only in
the case of a broken ROM table should we (a) emit
a message, then (b) work around the brokenness.
Such
On Sunday 31 October 2010 13:16:43 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:59 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
I think caring about the variant should strongly
be avoided. Use the ROM table by default. Only in
the case of a broken ROM table should we (a) emit
a
On Saturday 30 October 2010 07:24:08 Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday 29 October 2010 09:37:36 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Oyvind sorry, I just can't find it ... could you tell me where it is
please ?
Start here:
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/016
48
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Marek Vasut marek.vasut.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be automatically detected?
yes it should ... i'll send a patch on top of this one once I
figure out how to do it. Is that good enough approach for you?
Or shall we put these on hold until then?
I
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Marek Vasut marek.vasut.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Marek Vasut
marek.vasut.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be automatically detected?
yes it should ... i'll send a patch on top of this one once I
figure out how to do
On Friday 29 October 2010 07:43:18 Peter Stuge wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
In this patch, I introduce the use of -variant parameter, so I can
adjust the debug_base accordingly.
This seems completely wrong to me. I think this logic should just
stay in Tcl. So if anything, you would add a
On Friday 29 October 2010 08:18:46 Marek Vasut wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Marek Vasut
marek.vasut.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Marek Vasut
marek.vasut.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be automatically detected?
yes it
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 29 October 2010 07:43:18 Peter Stuge wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
In this patch, I introduce the use of -variant parameter, so I can
adjust the debug_base accordingly.
This seems completely wrong to me. I
Oyvind sorry, I just can't find it ... could you tell me where it is please ?
Start here:
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/016482.html
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7
Marek Vasut wrote:
add a parameter for dap_base.
That's what I wanted to do, but I'm still starting to get familiar
with OpenOCD again. Could you point me in a direction please?
Um, well, don't you just do the same thing as you did for -variant,
except use strtoul() in the C code?
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
So if anything, you would add a parameter for dap_base.
Could you point me in a direction please?
This should be picked up automatically, so this is the wrong direction.
If you type dap info 0, I believe it prints out the debug base,
so the code is even in there
On Friday 29 October 2010 09:37:36 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Oyvind sorry, I just can't find it ... could you tell me where it is
please ?
Start here:
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/01648
2.html
Hey,
I went through all of this stuff tonight ... and I
Marek Vasut wrote:
In this patch, I introduce the use of -variant parameter, so I can
adjust the debug_base accordingly.
This seems completely wrong to me. I think this logic should just
stay in Tcl. So if anything, you would add a parameter for dap_base.
//Peter
Shouldn't this be automatically detected?
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo