Re: [otlkcon-devel] C# / COM+ - RE: Status?

2009-07-22 Thread Henry Gusakovsky
As far as I know MAPI is implemented _only_ for Windows and _only_ by MS. So guys I would seriously encourage you using Wrapped PST architecture for this project. It is not late so far. Just imagine that providers is loaded in the several profiles. By several processes. And event one process can

Re: [otlkcon-devel] C# / COM+ - RE: Status?

2009-07-22 Thread Kervin Pierre
This sounds good. But the serialization/deserialization ends up being a lot of work. MAPI is a large API, so even after reducing things as much as I can I ended up with a large vocabulary for the protocol. Also not all the calls are data access related, so the database could not be used as

Re: [otlkcon-devel] C# / COM+ - RE: Status?

2009-07-22 Thread Kervin Pierre
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:49 PM To: g...@novadsp.com Cc: Dr. Net! - Eugen Rieck; otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kervin Pierre Subject: Re: [otlkcon-devel] C# / COM+ - RE: Status? As far as I know MAPI is implemented _only_ for Windows and _only_ by MS. So guys I would seriously