Hi Paolo and thank you for your response.
I have to keep tag and tag2 set because I need the interface and direction informations.

I tried to bypass the error about flowTypeEnterprise=43874, but I have other problems related to Net::sFlow :

ERROR: [sFlow.pm] HeaderData: Header data too long at test.pl line 24.
-> max value in script is 256, dumped value of my sflow packets is about ...3397779494... ERROR: [sFlow.pm] Datagram: Counter records count too big - rest of the datagram skipped at test.pl line 24.

Will try to contact Elisa on github...

Regards,
Cédric



Le 05/01/2017 à 13:27, Paolo Lucente a écrit :
Hi Cedric,

43874 is the IANA-assigned enterprise number of pmacct. You have that
as part of your sFlow packets since tag or tag2 are part of your config
directive aggregate. Tags is pmacct-specific information and hence it's
encoded with the pmacct enterprise number. I believe you have two ways
forward: either you remove tags from your aggregate; or you find a way
to make them swallowed (decoded or skipped) by Net::sFlow (btw we should
have Elisa, the author of Net::sFlow, on the list - dunno if she has
anything to comment at this propo).

Cheers,
Paolo

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 03:09:07PM +0100, Cédric ML wrote:
Hi Paolo,
sflowtool seems to give good results, but there's is still one
problem : in each sflow sample, I have this :

skipping unknown flow_sample_element: 43874:2 len=16
This causes problems with perl Net::sFlow library, as Flowdata
enterprise: 43874 is not recognized.
I'm unable to trace where this "43874" comes from...

Regards,
Cédric


Le 29/12/2016 à 12:38, Paolo Lucente a écrit :
Hi Cedric,

While i can't say it's the very same issue, it seems related to what i
describe in the following comment:

https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/issues/71#issuecomment-265497661

The sFlow dissector of Wireshark seems buggy and i recommend using
sflowtools for debugging and troubleshooting purposes.

Cheers,
Paolo

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:22:19PM +0100, Cédric ML wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to make pmacct work with a bgp agent (bird).

pmacct is installed on the bgp router, bgp_agent session is up, and
prefixes are exported to pmacct process.

This bgp router has three vlans (50,51,52) on interface eth0.

I'm trying to get correct correct values in incoming/outgoing VLANs,
and source/destination AS (using pretag.map, maybe there is a
simpler way ?)

My problem, when running "pmacctd -f pmacctd.sflow.conf", is that
wireshark tells me : "Expert Info (Error/Malformed): Malformed
Packet (Exception occurred)"
Agent address & ID are correctly displayed in capture (agent
address=127.0.0.1 & agent_id=0)

Here's the output of pmacctd :

# pmacctd -f pmacctd.sflow.conf
INFO ( default/core ): Promiscuous Mode Accounting Daemon, pmacctd
1.6.2-git (20161222-00)
INFO ( default/core ):
INFO ( default/core ): Reading configuration file
'/usr/local/etc/pmacct/pmacctd.sflow.conf'.
INFO ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): plugin_pipe_size=4096000 bytes
plugin_buffer_size=384 bytes
INFO ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): ctrl channel: obtained=124928 bytes
target=85328 bytes
INFO ( default/core ): [/usr/local/etc/pmacct/pretag.map] (re)loading map.
DEBUG ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): Creating sFlow agent.
INFO ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): Exporting flows to [192.168.156.109]:6343
INFO ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): Sampling at: 1/1000
INFO ( default/core ): [/usr/local/etc/pmacct/pretag.map] map
successfully (re)loaded.
INFO ( default/core ): [/usr/local/etc/pmacct/pretag.map] (re)loading map.
INFO ( default/core ): [/usr/local/etc/pmacct/pretag.map] map
successfully (re)loaded.
INFO ( default/core ): link type is: 1
WARN ( default/core ): eth0: no IPv4 address assigned
INFO ( default/core ): [/usr/local/etc/pmacct/agent_to_peer.map]
(re)loading map.
INFO ( default/core ): [/usr/local/etc/pmacct/agent_to_peer.map] map
successfully (re)loaded.
DEBUG ( default/core/BGP ): 1 thread(s) initialized
INFO ( default/core/BGP ): maximum BGP peers allowed: 2
INFO ( default/core/BGP ): waiting for BGP data on 127.0.0.1:17917
INFO ( default/core/BGP ): [127.0.0.1] BGP peers usage: 1/2
INFO ( default/core/BGP ): [x.x.x.x] Capability: MultiProtocol [1]
AFI [1] SAFI [1]
INFO ( default/core/BGP ): [x.x.x.x] Capability: 4-bytes AS [41] ASN
[203596]
INFO ( default/core/BGP ): [x.x.x.x] BGP_OPEN: Local AS: 203596
Remote AS: 203596 HoldTime: 240
DEBUG ( default/core/BGP ): [x.x.x.x] BGP_KEEPALIVE received
DEBUG ( default/core/BGP ): [x.x.x.x] BGP_KEEPALIVE sent
DEBUG ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): c08c60e112a7 -> 6805ca3dca86 (len = 1478,
captured = 128)
DEBUG ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): 78baf965af1f -> 6805ca3dca86 (len = 64,
captured = 64)
DEBUG ( sfprobe/sfprobe ): 78baf965af1f -> 6805ca3dca86 (len = 64,
captured = 64)
...


Can anybody tell me what may be wrong in my config ?

Best regards,
Cédric

========================================
== file pmacctd.sflow.conf
debug: true
daemonize: false
interface: eth0
aggregate: tag, src_host, dst_host, src_port, dst_port, proto, tos,
src_as, dst_as
plugins: sfprobe[sfprobe]
sfprobe_receiver: 192.168.156.109:6343
sfprobe_direction[sfprobe]: tag
sfprobe_ifindex[sfprobe]: tag2
sampling_rate: 1000
pmacctd_as: bgp
bgp_daemon: true
bgp_daemon_ip: 127.0.0.1
bgp_daemon_port: 17917
bgp_agent_map: /usr/local/etc/pmacct/agent_to_peer.map
bgp_peer_as_skip_subas: true
bgp_peer_src_as_type: bgp
pre_tag_map: /usr/local/etc/pmacct/pretag.map

== file agent_to_peer.map
bgp_ip=x.x.x.x ip=0.0.0.0/0

== file pretag.map (inspired by examples/pretag.map.example)
set_tag=1 filter='ether src 00:26:51:cb:8f:db' jeq=five
set_tag=1 filter='ether src d4:6d:50:23:2b:ea' jeq=six
set_tag=1 filter='ether src 78:ba:f9:65:af:1f' jeq=seven
set_tag=2 filter='ether dst 00:26:51:cb:8f:db' jeq=five
set_tag=2 filter='ether dst d4:6d:50:23:2b:ea' jeq=six
set_tag=2 filter='ether dst 78:ba:f9:65:af:1f' jeq=seven
set_tag2=50 label=five
set_tag2=51 label=six
set_tag2=52 label=seven

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to