Re: [pmacct-discussion] forwarding netflow

2016-11-17 Thread Paul Lockaby
Indeed that thread sums up exactly what I'm trying to do. Looks like I'll come up with something else. Thank you. > On Nov 17, 2016, at 12:23 PM, Paolo Lucente wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > Can you have a look at the following email (essentially same thread > as this one)?

Re: [pmacct-discussion] forwarding netflow

2016-11-17 Thread Paul Lockaby
I don't believe samplicate is appropriate for this task. If I sample and forward IPFIX, I need whatever is doing that to consistently forward the templates even as it samples everything else. samplicate just blindly drops packets to meet the frequency. I did see the "sampling_rate"

Re: [pmacct-discussion] forwarding netflow

2016-11-17 Thread Stephen Clark
Hmm... Doesn't samplicate do this? and each should be specified as [/[/]], where IP address of the receiver port UDP number of the receiver (default 2000) number of received datagrams between successive copied

Re: [pmacct-discussion] forwarding netflow

2016-11-17 Thread Paul Lockaby
Ah, yeah, hmm. Doesn't seem to support any sampling of the data it forwards so I guess I'll have to find something else. Thanks, -Paul > On Nov 17, 2016, at 12:36 AM, Tristan Bendall > wrote: > > Hi Paul > > Pretty sure "tee" does this? Have a look below: > >