Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe vs Minerva Basic

Hi, I'd object to the word "rightfully". Wolfgang On 05/04/2017 14:38, desin wrote: hi all i stumbled yesterday on something odd two programs in development under SMSQE gave errors under the emulators (q-emulator,uqlx) with Minerva ROMS under SMSQE it is possible to have

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe vs Minerva Basic

Am 05.04.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Wolf: Hi, I'd object to the word "rightfully". Wolfgang objection noted ! correct would be the better word greetings from Switzerland Markus ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe vs Minerva Basic

On 5-4-2017 14:38, desin wrote: hi all i stumbled yesterday on something odd two programs in development under SMSQE gave errors under the emulators (q-emulator,uqlx) with Minerva ROMS under SMSQE it is possible to have on$,on%,to%,to$,for$,for%,end$,end% as variables. These are rightfully

[Ql-Users] Smsqe vs Minerva Basic

hi all i stumbled yesterday on something odd two programs in development under SMSQE gave errors under the emulators (q-emulator,uqlx) with Minerva ROMS under SMSQE it is possible to have on$,on%,to%,to$,for$,for%,end$,end% as variables. These are rightfully rejected under Minerva PS