Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Ralf Reköndt
Yes, I know. Although Marcel do not know, I would be interested in knowing the way, they have realized it. Ralf Am 11.04.2017 um 12:07 schrieb Derek Stewart: On 11/04/17 09:58, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Yes, would be interesting to know, how QLib does this with its compiled "resident" extensions.

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Derek Stewart
On 10/04/17 20:15, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Ralf Reköndt wrote: As this seems to be very near at QLib, it makes me wonder, if TT has any long lost source code of QLib. IIRC the QLib compiler was written in Basic. I don't think there are many similarities besides the basic concept. Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Francois Lanciault wrote: > With all those discussions about bug correction and the good, > benevolent people who spend time to hunt them down, I wonder : > > Is there a proper way to report bugs in SMSQ/E ? > > Does asking kindly on this list enough ? :-) Yeah, that is probably your best bet.

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Derek Stewart wrote: > Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E internal compiler produce a > compiled version of the SBASIC programme? Perhaps it's possible, but I don't see a use case for it as there is already QLiberator and Turbo for that. And Turbo is probably faster. Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > Nevertheless it would be a great idea if you could write a procedure in > SBASIC and LRESPR the compiled code as SBASIC extension so you have it > always available. AFAIK there is no higher-level language compiler capable > of producing SBASIC extensions - or perhaps

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Derek Stewart
On 11/04/17 09:58, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Yes, would be interesting to know, how QLib does this with its compiled "resident" extensions. Ralf -Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 Datum: 2017-04-11T10:47:36+0200 Von: "Jan Bredenbeek" On 11

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Ralf Reköndt
Yes, would be interesting to know, how QLib does this with its compiled "resident" extensions. Ralf -Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 Datum: 2017-04-11T10:47:36+0200 Von: "Jan Bredenbeek" On 11 April 2017 at 10:07, Derek Stewart

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Giorgio Garabello
Il 11 apr 2017 10:47, "Jan Bredenbeek" ha scritto: On 11 April 2017 at 10:07, Derek Stewart wrote: Hi Marcel, > > Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E internal compiler produce a > compiled version of the SBASIC programme? You can EXEC a SBASIC

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

2017-04-11 Thread Jan Bredenbeek
On 11 April 2017 at 10:07, Derek Stewart wrote: Hi Marcel, > > Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E internal compiler produce a > compiled version of the SBASIC programme? You can EXEC a SBASIC program in the same way as a 'normal' executable program on SMSQ/E (which