Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread pgraf
On 15 May 2017 at 11:06, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 11:01 AM, pg...@q40.de wrote: > > On 15 May 2017 at 10:34, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 10:21 AM, Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > > > > On 13 May 2017 at 21:18, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > >

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread pgraf
On 15 May 2017 at 10:34, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 10:21 AM, Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > > On 13 May 2017 at 21:18, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > > > > > This is unplanned and short notice, sorry, seven of us are already on > > > Online chat tonight (now) if anyone

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread Jan Bredenbeek
On 13 May 2017 at 21:18, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > This is unplanned and short notice, sorry, seven of us are already on > Online chat tonight (now) if anyone else would like to join in! > Didn't miss it, but your mail ended up in my spam box (which happens with more of your

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread Jan Bredenbeek
On 15 May 2017 at 12:35, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > And to answer original question, the headers are intact and show it > passing through yahoo.com SMTP server so its route matches its From: > address. > > If you look at the headers your spam filter should tell you why it >

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 11:01 AM, pg...@q40.de wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 10:34, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 10:21 AM, Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > > > On 13 May 2017 at 21:18, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > > > > > > > This is unplanned and short notice, sorry,

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 11:28 AM, pg...@q40.de wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 11:06, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 11:01 AM, pg...@q40.de wrote: > > > On 15 May 2017 at 10:34, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2017, at 10:21 AM, Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread John Alexander
Dilwyn you are a victim of domain keys you need to sort out your Mail man instance  to send proper keys not spoof the senders keys causing the mail to be rejected often silently DomainKeys Identified Mail | | | DomainKeys Identified Mail DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is an email

Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum online chat

2017-05-15 Thread Dave Park
That's a missing or malformed DKIM record. As yahoo.com and q-v-d.com are not the same domain name it is an issue. This explains it clearly: https://space.dmarcian.com/how-can-spfdkim-pass-and-yet-dmarc-fail/ On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > On 15