Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

For those not tracking the DrRacket github repo, this feature is now available in the Racket snapshot builds. https://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/ Thanks, Dan On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Feltey wrote: > I think I've finally got something working within

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

I think I've finally got something working within DrRacket so I've just pushed a change to check-syntax[1] which adds a `Remove Unused Requires` right-click menu item to DrRacket which will remove all requires which check-syntax marks as unused. If you're using DrRacket from github, I'd

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

I've started working on adding this refactoring to DrRacket[1], it's not quite as full-featured(and is definitely still a bit buggy) as what racket-mode in emacs seems to allow, but it's a first step and I'd appreciate suggestions or requests on how DrRacket can better support developers editing

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

The `racket-trim-requires` and `racket-base-requires` commands use `raco check-requires` behind the scenes (then format/sort as does `racket-tidy-requires`). Today I tried to use `racket-trim-requires` on a Typed Racket file containing `define-type`; and got the error you mention. This turned out

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

> On Mar 13, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle > wrote: > > Do you mean a drracket plugin that > i. Expands #lang racket into racket/base and requires, > ii. removes the unneeded requires I am sure that one day soon someone will write a dissertation that (1)

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

Sorry - I meant to reply all. My questions weren't directed at anyone specific. S. On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 at 21:24, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > Do you mean a drracket plugin that > i. Expands #lang racket into racket/base and requires, > ii. removes the unneeded

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

I know that one. I want the refactoring. > On Mar 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: > > Not the same thing, but if you mouse over the requires in DrRacket, it > will put a red background on the ones that have no apparent use (of > course, requires may

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

The bubble in the bottom right corner turns green when it is done (or red, if it found an error). Robby On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 10:40:15 AM UTC-7, Robby Findler wrote: >> Not the same thing, but if you

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 10:40:15 AM UTC-7, Robby Findler wrote: > Not the same thing, but if you mouse over the requires in DrRacket, it > will put a red background on the ones that have no apparent use (of > course, requires may have an effect too; neither tool picks that up, > IIUC). >

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

raco check-requires does the job. I use emacs racket-mode, but it's hobbled in ways I haven't investigated -- e.g. when I try to use tidy or trim requires it gives me a "Can't do, source file has error" when it doesn't, or at least not in a way I can see. -- You received this message because

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

Not the same thing, but if you mouse over the requires in DrRacket, it will put a red background on the ones that have no apparent use (of course, requires may have an effect too; neither tool picks that up, IIUC). Robby On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Jay McCarthy

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

Actually it is the trim option. I prefer racket-base-requires though Jay On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:37 PM Jay McCarthy wrote: > M-x racket-tidy-requires > > Jay > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:29 PM Matthias Felleisen > wrote: > > > Does Emacs really

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

M-x racket-tidy-requires Jay On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:29 PM Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Does Emacs really give you this refactoring? If so, I may have to > reconsider DrRacket. > > > > On Mar 13, 2017, at 1:18 PM, Jay McCarthy > wrote: > > > >

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

raco check-requires might do some of what you want. -Philip On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > racket-mode in Emacs does this > > Jay > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM Dan Liebgold > wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> In

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

Does Emacs really give you this refactoring? If so, I may have to reconsider DrRacket. > On Mar 13, 2017, at 1:18 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > > racket-mode in Emacs does this > > Jay > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM Dan Liebgold >

Re: [racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

racket-mode in Emacs does this Jay On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM Dan Liebgold wrote: > Hi - > > In refactoring a some Racket code I'd love to have a "require and provide > only what you need" tool to help trim down the require and provide lists. > Is there such a

[racket-users] refactoring help/tools?

Hi - In refactoring a some Racket code I'd love to have a "require and provide only what you need" tool to help trim down the require and provide lists. Is there such a thing? Or at least a better approach for this than inspection or trial and error? Thanks, Dna -- You received this message