Am 28.04.2017 um 08:07 schrieb Alex Harsanyi:
>
> In the end, the start up time does not bother me too much, as it is a GUI
> application and I spend a lot of time using it after starting it up, so the 7
> second wait is acceptable. I have other, more interesting, application
> features to
On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 10:04:52 PM UTC+8, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I notice that your code calls `running-stickman-icon` on startup, which
> takes about 2 seconds on my machine.
Well, this is embarrassing for me. I remember adding that code in and having
to decide on whether to wait 2
At Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:07:01 -0700 (PDT), Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> > * The size of the bytecode does matter (and switching to Chez scheme's
> run-time could hopefully improve that)
>
> All the .zo files put together are about 4Mb. I'm not sure if this is big or
> not?
4MB is not big. But your
At Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Dupéron Georges wrote:
> If I understand correctly, [...]
Yes, that all looks right.
> It would be nice to find a way to detect what code gets executed when
> a module is required, at the various meta-levels. Maybe running raco
> cover on an empty file
> > * Alex Harsanyi's start-up time is due to run-time (phase 0) initialisation
> > code in the required libraries, including things like (define v
> > costly-expression), which look like they could be saved as constants, but
> > actually involve running the expression.
>
> I actively try to
On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 2:47:41 AM UTC+8, Dupéron Georges wrote:
> Thank you Matthew for the explanation.
>
> If I understand correctly,
>
> * Alex Harsanyi's start-up time is due to run-time (phase 0) initialisation
> code in the required libraries, including things like (define v
>
Thank you Matthew for the explanation.
If I understand correctly,
* Alex Harsanyi's start-up time is due to run-time (phase 0) initialisation
code in the required libraries, including things like (define v
costly-expression), which look like they could be saved as constants, but
actually
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:04:15 -0700 (PDT), Dupéron Georges wrote:
> However, I'm not sure what operations can cause compile-time code to
> be run in this situation. My (possibly incorrect) understanding is
> that macros are executed only once (when expanding the code), but the
> code to the
8 matches
Mail list logo
