Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-17 Thread Jay McCarthy
I can make a -lib version of jq for you. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-7, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> Just installing rackunit-lib will avoid the docs and tests, which should >> substantially

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Dan Liebgold
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-7, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Just installing rackunit-lib will avoid the docs and tests, which should > substantially reduce the footprint. > That's a fix for rackunit... I'm also using Jay's awesome job-queue package, which pulls in scribble

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Dan Liebgold
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:48:34 PM UTC-7, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > `raco pkg remove rackunit && raco pkg remove --auto` should do it. > "raco pkg remove --auto -i" did it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Ah, I didn't even know about --auto. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 6:48 PM Vincent St-Amour < stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > `raco pkg remove rackunit && raco pkg remove --auto` should do it. > > Vincent > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:42:23 -0500, > Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > > >

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Vincent St-Amour
`raco pkg remove rackunit && raco pkg remove --auto` should do it. Vincent On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:42:23 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > Unfortunately, I don't think there's an analogue of apt autoremove, so you > probably have to do it manually. > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 6:37 PM Dan

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Ed Hirgelt
Won’t raco pkg remove and raco pkg empty-trash do the trick? Ed > On Mar 16, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > Unfortunately, I don't think there's an analogue of apt autoremove, so you > probably have to do it manually. > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 6:37

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Unfortunately, I don't think there's an analogue of apt autoremove, so you probably have to do it manually. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 6:37 PM Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-7, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > Just installing

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Dan Liebgold
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-7, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Just installing rackunit-lib will avoid the docs and tests, which should > substantially reduce the footprint. > > Sam > Very cool now, say I've already gone and installed rackunit. How can I remove all those

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Just installing rackunit-lib will avoid the docs and tests, which should substantially reduce the footprint. Sam On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 6:25 PM Dan Liebgold wrote: > Hi - > > (This is a continuation of some discussions I've had on the dev list a > couple years ago.)