[Rdkit-devel] RHEL/CentOS 5 RPM in the works

. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu testrunner.patch Description: Binary data -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways

Re: [Rdkit-devel] RHEL/CentOS 5 RPM in the works

I'll see what's easier, I'd like to do this and move along -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event

Re: [Rdkit-devel] RDKit on Github

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Greg Landrum greg.land...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote: What is involved in doing the mirroring? We could explore having it run from the VM that hosts rdkit.org if it would help. I run this script hourly

Re: [Rdkit-devel] 2013.03 (Q1 2013) RDkit release

. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu -- Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance

Re: [Rdkit-devel] Beta of Q1 2014 release available

.tar.gz I checked this builds in Fedora, a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6821330 You may be happy to know it also works for ARM :) -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/gialluFor

Re: [Rdkit-devel] 2014.03 (Q1 2014) RDKit release

in the RPMs for Fedora/CentOS. If someone is interested I can try including them in my next build. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu

Re: [Rdkit-devel] [Rdkit-discuss] 2014.03 (Q1 2014) RDKit release

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:36 AM, GALLY Jose Manuel jose.manuel.ga...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think you could fix this? ​Yeah, I got it fixed. Thanks for noticing. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

build RHEL 7 and Fedora RPMs at the usual COPR location, then will have a look at software collections. -- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinker Garage - http://tin

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

etting 2.7 as RPMs, but the deafult build sticks to what Red Hat provides in the repo. -- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinker Garage - http://tinkergarage.it -- Find a

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

anluca, do > you know if this could be a viable solution? Yes, provided I rebuild the RDKit RPM itself as a software collection, so it can depend on other collections. I will have a look at that -- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinker Garage

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com> wrote: > This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864 > has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7 > installed manually. I'll check it out -- Gianluca Sforna http://

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

ctions approach mentioned by Riccardo is best, so I can pick up an updated dep. By the way, the build succeeded except for the cartridge, apparently the makefile is broken for older versions (8.x); -- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinke

Re: [Rdkit-devel] InChI 1.05

e attached in case it may be useful to others. Did you try and run the tests after compiling rdkit against 1.05? IIRC I had failing tests with prereleases -- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinker Garage - http

Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:59 PM, David Hall wrote: > The EPEL repo has cmake3 package (3.6). Can that not be a dependency for > rdkit in epel? Yep, I overlooked that one. So a newer cmake requirement is not an issue

Re: [Rdkit-devel] RDKit Python wrappers

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Brian Kelley wrote: > Having used both, I think that boost wrappers are far more pythonic, compile > faster, do docstrings better and finally handle exceptions between c++ and > Python far better. > > The downside is that when you get a

[Rdkit-devel] Arch dependent test failures

-- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinker Garage - http://tinkergarage.it -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites

Re: [Rdkit-devel] Arch dependent test failures

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Gianluca Sforna <gia...@gmail.com> wrote: > The really weird failures are the the i686 ones, where all the tests > passed with python2, while a large number of them segfaulted on > python3. So I digged this issue further and got this backtrace of o