proof. But we know a lot more than nothing.
Steve
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004, at 10:41 AM, Gibbens, Daniel G. wrote:
Specifically,
science has provided reliable information about the processes and development
of the physical universe and life within it. No scientific
Title: Message
I
assume this isa typical reaction of the "Christian Right". I'm
delighted you list folk are not stimulated to make such quick comments, but
I'dappreciate anyviews (I confess ignorance about John G.
Roberts).
Dan
-Original Message-From: Christian Response
Title: Message
I applaud Rick's recommendation of the DeWolf article,
below, which I used in a follow-up piece,attemptingperhaps
simplisticadvocacy on public school teaching (55 Okla. L. Rev.
613):
However science is defined, there is
scientific support for the big bang theory as
because
the hoaxer thought it sounded sinister.
Sincerely,
Michael
Camfield,
Development
Director
ACLU of Oklahoma
From: Gibbens, Daniel G.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:38 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: curiosity
Good people: This email came to me.
Before I
Title: Message
Belowisdraft language fora billfor our state
legislature in light of pro-ID bills filed. Although the deadline has
passed for bill-filing this session,some thinksomething of this sort
may havefuture use. So comments and criticismare
requested.
Obviously the draft
is an
AMEN
Daniel G. Gibbens, CDR, USNR-R
Regents Professor of Law Emeritus
University of Oklahoma
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Finkelman
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 11:33 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Unsure whether a current instance is responsive, but here it is, from
the Feb. 2007 issue of Episcopal Life, p. 20: The Executive Board of
the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia on Jan. 18 authorized Bishop Peter Lee
to 'take such steps as may be necessary to recover or secure such real
and personal
On the recommendation of a friend, I just read an short article on this
website entitled The Rise of Christian Fascism and Its Threat to
American Democracy posted today. I'm curious about any views on the
credibility of this website, or for that matter, on this particular
article.
Dan Gibbens
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibbens, Daniel G.
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ucla. edu
Subject: AlterNet website
On the recommendation of a friend, I just read
SHALL WE HIRE A MONUMENT ENGRAVER TO GO TO ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY AND ADD
THE MISSING WORDS ?
A MESSAGE FROM AN APPALLED OBSERVER:
Today I went to visit the new World War
II Memorial in Washington , DC I got an unexpected history lesson Because I'm a
baby boomer, I was one of the
I understand public schools legislation with this label was passed in Texas
last year that includes provisions that are ambiguous as well as some protected
by Supreme Court decisions (implying otherwise). If nothing else, it at least
provides students a nose in the door for the intelligent
Justice Brennan's well-known statement, concurring in Schempp, 374 US at 300:
teaching about the Bible in classes in literature or history is
permissible. As literature, surely teaching about the Bible is different from
other literature items, distinctively involving the necessity of treating
Many good Christians - both conservatives and liberals -- believe prayer is
equally effective when in Jesus name is omitted, and actually pray
accordingly.
If nothing else, the Establishment Clause does restrict people when they are
acting as part of government.
Of course Chaplain
Chaplain K, below: But can governments pray?
What is government, if it is not people? More specifically, when meeting,
isn't the city council government? If it has an agenda, isn't that a
government agenda? So people speaking pursuant to the meeting agenda, isn't
that government acting?
14 matches
Mail list logo