We want to keep a backup or a mirror of your files in a server we don't
fully trust. You can have an encrypted FS on a file, and copy the
complete FS to the untrusted server, but it is inefficient, and you get
no granularity at all.
In our case, the remote server runs amanda, and we want to
Yet another thread on the matter
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8threadm=9q27k2%24rh%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.twrnum=1prev=/groups%3Fq%3Drsync%2Bencrypt%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D9q27k2%2524rh%25241%2540FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw%26rnum%3D1
--
To unsubscribe or
--On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:01 PM -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd say that a security regimen that requires xattrs to
tighten security is misguided.
And you'd be wrong. Simple user/group security is not _nearly_ enough for
all sorts of use cases. Simple use case:
- Alice and
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:29:04AM -0400, Carson Gaspar wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:01 PM -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd say that a security regimen that requires xattrs to
tighten security is misguided.
And you'd be wrong. Simple user/group security is not
Hi,
It seems that the --dest-filter patch of Kyle Jones can help you.
Here is a link
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22--dest-filter%22+group:mailing.unix.rsy
nc+group:mailing.unix.rsynchl=enlr=ie=UTF-8group=mailing.unix.rsyncselm
=b6f55s%24256q%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.twrnum=1
Addady
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that the --dest-filter patch of Kyle Jones can help you.
Here is a link
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22--dest-filter%22+group:mailing.unix.rsy
nc+group:mailing.unix.rsynchl=enlr=ie=UTF-8group=mailing.unix.rsyncselm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that the --dest-filter patch of Kyle Jones can help you.
Here is a link
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22--dest-filter%22+group:mailing.unix.rsy
nc+group:mailing.unix.rsynchl=enlr=ie=UTF-8group=mailing.unix.rsyncselm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The filter run on the client !
Are you sure? I just re-read the patch and it still seems to be at the
server.
Maybe I don't have the right idea of server/client in my head. Or I am
just misreading the patch.
How can I tell it's on the server?
m
--
To
jw schultz wrote:
Stop thinking client and server. Once the session is
initiated there is little difference. Think instead sender
and receiver.
Good advise. Have to rephrase myself, then ;)
As I read the patch, it seems to be running an arbitrary command on the
receiver.
I am thinking of
I am thinking of running an arbitrary command on the server, when it is
Of course, I meant s/server/sender/;
m
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Martin Pool wrote:
On 25 Jun 2003, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:34:38AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
There is no mtime for xattrs, so they are transferred every time as
part of the file list.
One possibly better solution would be to create some kind of CRC
I have some problems while authentication.
I created RSA keys and placed the public key on the remote host.
With the user toto, I have the following command line :
rsync --arvz --rsh=ssh Nouveaudossier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/essai_ftp/test/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/essai_ftp/test/
but
Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Jun 2003, Hardy Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevertheless i do think it worth having something in
patches.
Yes, if I can get this working I think the best place for it to end up
is as an
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:03:46PM +0200, Julien VARLET wrote:
I have some problems while authentication.
I created RSA keys and placed the public key on the remote host.
With the user toto, I have the following command line :
rsync --arvz --rsh=ssh Nouveaudossier
[EMAIL
If i recall correctly (i've not gone back to review that
patch) that patch required whole-file transfers two avoid
doing the operation twice per file. If the filter is
deterministic and particularly if changes have minimal
cascade effect you may be able to still take advantage of
the rsync
Is it possible to use a rsync server with ssl crypting ?
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Look at stunnel :- www.stunnel.org
Julien VARLET wrote:
Is it possible to use a rsync server with ssl crypting ?
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:31:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If i recall correctly (i've not gone back to review that
patch) that patch required whole-file transfers two avoid
s/two/to/ #ick
doing the operation twice per file. If the filter is
deterministic and particularly if
If i recall correctly (i've not gone back to review that
patch) that patch required whole-file transfers two avoid
s/two/to/ #ick
doing the operation twice per file. If the filter is
deterministic and particularly if changes have minimal
cascade effect you may be able to still
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 05:45:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Lots of missing attribution maybe correctly reinserted]
[please don't remove attributions of quoted content]
jw wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The idea of this patch seem to me very useful.
I'm plan to use it with
--On Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:16 AM -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Impossible with simple user/group permissions.
Not impossible. I've done that sort of thing many times.
-rwxr-x---1 charlie cdab 3658 Jan 20 17:35 .
-rw-rw-r--1 charlie david3658 Jan 20
When using Cygwin Rsync 2.5.6/OpenSSH 3.6.1 for copying files from
Win2k-Win2k, I get 2 or 3 hung processes on the receiving-side out of about
every 50 runs. These hung processes cause the system to be unable to
reboot(?!), requiring a hard reset. Killing the processes allows a graceful
reboot
Hello,
If I rename a directory full of files, or a bunch of files, and I use
Rsync to update the directory tree, Rsync will upload all these files
again and delete the old ones. This is suboptimal since all the data is
already there.
Rsync should be able to check for renamed files by scanning
-Original Message-
From: Tillman, James
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:18 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Cygwin Rsync 2.5.6 over SSH hangs on Win2k-Win2k
When using Cygwin Rsync 2.5.6/OpenSSH 3.6.1 for copying files from
Win2k-Win2k, I get 2 or 3 hung processes on the
jw schultz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:28:32PM -0500, David Lambert wrote:
I have been using rsync for the last year or so. Generally I am very
pleased with the performance and features, but I am forced to use a
rather unreliable link to one of my mirrors. Consequentially rsync often
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If i recall correctly (i've not gone back to review that
patch) that patch required whole-file transfers two avoid
doing the operation twice per file. If the filter is
deterministic and particularly if changes have minimal
cascade effect you may be able to
Hello everyone.
I have a question about using the include/exclude function for rsync.
What I am trying to do is backup specific directories and their
corresponding data, while at the same time, excluding other directories.
Specifically, I have a backup server with the follow setup:
I'm finally getting back to finishing up the testing for my patch of the
exclude from handling. The main thing I had on my list was checking
that --delete-excluded worked right, prompted by your comments:
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 05:22:45PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
As your patch stands now
Kyle Jones wrote:
Right. I was willing to give up the checksumming for my
application. It seems that you could code a --source-filter
patch that would
- compare the source and destination modtimes
- if they differ, then apply the filter to the source file storing
the output in a temp file.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:07:42PM -0700, Jason Williams wrote:
rsync -avn --include-file=/home/rsyncfile /backupstorage/D/ /home/rsyncbak
The most common failing is people not specifying the excludes relative
to the root of the transfer (it's not relative to the root of the file
system). Thus,
Jason Williams wrote:
Hello everyone.
I have a question about using the include/exclude function for rsync.
What I am trying to do is backup specific directories and their
corresponding data, while at the same time, excluding other directories.
Specifically, I have a backup server with the
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:51:03PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
I'm finally getting back to finishing up the testing for my patch of the
exclude from handling. The main thing I had on my list was checking
that --delete-excluded worked right, prompted by your comments:
[snip]
Sounds good. I've
When using Cygwin Rsync 2.5.6/OpenSSH 3.6.1 for copying files from
Win2k-Win2k, I get 2 or 3 hung processes on the receiving-side out of about
every 50 runs. These hung processes cause the system to be unable to
reboot(?!), requiring a hard reset. Killing the processes allows a graceful
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0400, Carson Gaspar wrote:
--On Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:16 AM -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Impossible with simple user/group permissions.
Not impossible. I've done that sort of thing many times.
-rwxr-x---1 charlie cdab
34 matches
Mail list logo
