At 9:29 PM -0500 9/22/06, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
I believe it would be desirable to have a text field in AERO-ML to specify a
license for the file, and also to have a field for specifying the
sensitivity (secret, classified, proprietary, etc.).
I suppose that the license field could look like
At 10:13 AM +1000 9/22/06, Brian, Geoff wrote:
Hi all,
We have been having some discussion here about the use of the
Provenance definition for detailing the source of data used to build
data sets.
Currently Provenance provides information on the author, function
creation data, and links to
Would there be merit to having an optional subelement to sensitivity,
such as classification? This would allow, if sensitivity was
'classified' to indicate the level of classification (confidential,
secret, top secret) (at least in the US, that's how this works).
-- Bruce
Actually, perhaps
