Hi Hervé,
In theory, if it is possible to piggy-back install Stackless on OSX at
all, it should be possible to add support for OSX. Unfortunately, I have
no access to OSX and no experience with this system. Therefore I can't
implement OSX support. Feel free to create a patch and send a pull re
Hi Hervé,
On 18.07.14 23:21, Hervé Coatanhay wrote:
> I'm happy you bring up slp-installer on the mailing list. Is it usable
> on macOSX ? If not, could I be of any help about it ?
OS X is currently not supported by this piggy-back installer.
If we are going this route, I think it would use the w
I'm happy you bring up slp-installer on the mailing list. Is it usable
on macOSX ? If not, could I be of any help about it ?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Anselm Kruis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the problem is probably fixed. I just uploaded new installers to bitbucket.
> See https://bitbucket.org/akrui
Hi,
the problem is probably fixed. I just uploaded new installers to
bitbucket. See https://bitbucket.org/akruis/slp-installer/issue/5
Cheers
Anselm
Am 16.07.2014 22:10, schrieb Anselm Kruis:
Hi,
thanks to Michael Bravo I found a problem with the PyPi installer
https://pypi.python.org/py
Hi,
thanks to Michael Bravo I found a problem with the PyPi installer
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/stackless-python. It doesn't work for
Debian based systems. The cause is the different set of built-in
modules. Debian ships many modules as built-ins which a standard built
provides as separate
Hi,
I'm the one who created the stackless-python package on PyPi. I think
your question is very valid, but unfortunately, I don't have an answer
yet. My work schedule was very tight this week and I didn't find any
time to look after the stackless-python package or even to read the
stackless m
Hi all,
I was wondering. Now that `stackless-python` is like any other pypi package
on a pip perspective, what will/should happen if I want to use a package
that has `stackless-python` as a dependency in a pypy virtualenv ?
cheers,
Hervé
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
>
Hi Stefan,
On 6/28/12 5:37 PM, Stefan Drees wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 28.06.12 16:51, Christian Tismer wrote (slightly edited):
...
Stackless becomes a PyPI package that contains only the binary and the
few changed library modules.
After
pip install stackless-python
you have stackless insi
On 6/28/12 5:54 PM, Dinu Gherman wrote:
Christian Tismer:
Is that the right concept? Is it enough to make a big difference, by giving
users the impression that they just added something to python?
Is it acceptable to have a different name for the executable?
Or _what_ is really making a differ
Christian Tismer:
> Is that the right concept? Is it enough to make a big difference, by giving
> users the impression that they just added something to python?
> Is it acceptable to have a different name for the executable?
>
> Or _what_ is really making a difference?
>
> eagerly hoping for rep
Hi Chris,
Am 28.06.12 16:51, Christian Tismer wrote (slightly edited):
...
Stackless becomes a PyPI package that contains only the binary and the
few changed library modules.
After
pip install stackless-python
you have stackless inside site-packages, and you get a message that
tells yo
Hi Friends,
while preparing my Euro-Talk, I'm still tinkering forth and back with
a simply installable stackless package which behaves as it were just
a module.
I need your opinion ASAP, because I'd like to add this as a possible
stackless direction for the near future.
What does help Stackles
12 matches
Mail list logo
