Re: [SyncEvolution] EXDATE in iCalendar 2.0

2009-07-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
doesn't match. Bye, Patrick On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 09:07 -0700, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello! Yanshuang found that Evolution and ScheduleWorld do not quite agree on the interpretation of EXDATE: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1805#c4 The server sends a recurring meeting relative

Re: [SyncEvolution] [os-libsynthesis] EXDATE in iCalendar 2.0

2009-07-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:10 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 21:37 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: [old revision of EXDATE conversion] Does that look right? Hah, no-one dared to say anything! You missed your chance to spot a weakness in the code above, caught by the SyncEvolution

Re: [SyncEvolution] [os-libsynthesis] EXDATE in iCalendar 2.0

2009-07-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncML Tests 2009-07-30: head-evolution-testing

2009-07-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
] http://www.synthesis.ch/sync2 via libsoup: Connection terminated unexpectedly funambol successful zyb: failed The known anchor problem. google successful -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncML + OBEX

2009-07-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution

2009-08-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
program. You don't have to implement it for sync. I appreciate your help - maybe these questions have been answered somewhere already. :) No, not in detail. So it's worth doing this on the list :-) -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncML + OBEX

2009-08-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
the transport to push the response. Exposing this in the API would make it unnecessarily complex for other cases where the response can be pushed, so if possible, I'd like to hide this PUT/GET semantic inside obexd. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncML + OBEX

2009-08-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
SyncEvolution return multiple results? No. There's exactly one response for each incoming message. I ask this because there's a final out parameter for process(). That signals end-of-connection, not final response for this message. Should I rename the parameter? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content

[SyncEvolution] open tasks: 0.9.1, 1.0 and beyond

2009-08-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
: I already mentioned Mac OS X. Windows anyone? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf

Re: [SyncEvolution] compiling 0.9 on F-11 and rawhide

2009-08-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
the software to compile is the bigger problem ;-) FWIW, there SyncEvolution is getting packaged for F-11: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5061 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here

[SyncEvolution] status 2009-08-18

2009-08-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
needlessly affected by this performance problem when switching between configs (#5388, assigned to Jussi) -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's

Re: [SyncEvolution] atomic updates of local data (EDS)

2009-08-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
with multiple Evolution releases. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus bindings: C++ or C?

2009-08-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 11:26 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:43 +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: Marcel Holtmann wrote: inside BlueZ, ConnMan, oFono etc. we are using libgdbus which is a nice and small helper library for writing D-Bus servers in C without any big extra

Re: [SyncEvolution] next generation syncevo-dbus-server

2009-08-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
at some point by server 3. the client now owns an interface instance which has methods for editing the config, starting a sync, backup/restore 4. the client makes one or more config changes 5. the client saves those changes and releases the interface -- Best Regards, Patrick

[SyncEvolution] ZYB anchors (was: RE: SyncML Tests 2009-07-27: head-evolution-testing)

2009-08-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
you have an update for us on this issue? The next chance to get ZYB.com included is 0.9.1, sometime in September. If you can't get it fixed, perhaps we should look into disabling the anchor check in the SyncML client? That should work around the issue. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content

Re: [SyncEvolution] next generation syncevo-dbus-server

2009-08-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
is applied to the Session and not saved permanently. There has to be an on-disk config for this to work, though. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's

[SyncEvolution] schedule SyncEvolution 0.9.1 + 1.0

2009-08-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
X and Maemo support (although I really hope that the later two will be covered by external developers) * split data transformation part out of libsynthesis -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee

Re: [SyncEvolution] why not a forum

2009-08-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
=231 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] inscription mailing-list

2009-08-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
for tending to user questions and even longer delays for you. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf

[SyncEvolution] status 2009-09-01

2009-09-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] addressbook: contact entry without REV (was: Re: sync evolution/horde)

2009-09-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
this would be to get access to a Horde server and help from the Horde developers in diagnosing this issue. Do you think that this could be arranged? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here

Re: [SyncEvolution] SDK documentation for syncevolution

2009-09-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
these tests would have to be moved into main(), after loading backends. This should be doable and is worthwhile, because right now the order of global class initialization is somewhat dubious. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am

Re: [SyncEvolution] dbus api specification

2009-09-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
). Currently the implementation raises a std::runtime_error exception with a string that explains the error, then this is translated into a org.syncevolution.Exception error with that string as detailed explanation. On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 23:04 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Changes to be made

Re: [SyncEvolution] dbus api specification

2009-09-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello! FYI, here's a clarification for the config handling in the new D-Bus API. commit f549ce9468fd7950845699f7b3db685941a0e325 Author: Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com Date: Fri Sep 11 12:26:33 2009 +0200 D-Bus API: unset property clarification Unset properties

[SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: network monitoring

2009-09-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello! Is this API okay? It's in the dbus-api branch, please comment and/or suggest further patches. commit 35f555809d79dec0a6e012a2706a3b72c54bd563 Author: Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com Date: Fri Sep 11 20:03:44 2009 +0200 D-Bus API: added support for monitoring presence of servers

Re: [SyncEvolution] addressbook: contact entry without REV (was: Re: sync evolution/horde)

2009-09-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
our testing would result in several questions that only a Horde developer can answer. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am

Re: [SyncEvolution] addressbook: contact entry without REV (was: Re: sync evolution/horde)

2009-09-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
synchronize mail via SyncML. Can't you use IMAP? It's a much more suitable protocol. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I

Re: [SyncEvolution] Use libsyncml to test with Obexd

2009-09-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
I'll do that myself under the LGPL that currently covers it, then Synthesis can later sanction that and relicense it as BSD like the rest of the SDK. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make

Re: [SyncEvolution] Horde sync + multiple address books (was: contact lost ?)

2009-09-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
(for instance, sources/addressbook_clients) and adapt its evolutionsource and URI property. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am

Re: [SyncEvolution] Use libsyncml to test with Obexd

2009-09-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
be sufficient ;-) -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] configuration + multiple peers

2009-09-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
to it and work around its limitations? For the scenario that there are many accounts for one server, the new scheme remains the same as the old scheme to create one server config for each account, right? Yes. But this is unlikely, isn't it? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message

Re: [SyncEvolution] addressbook: contact entry without REV (was: Re: sync evolution/horde)

2009-09-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 04:49 +0100, Thierry Chen wrote: Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com a écrit : On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 10:03 +0100, chen wrote: opening calendar: Unknown error That's a local EDS problem. Can you check that syncevolution without parameters lists a calendar? Can

Re: [SyncEvolution] desktop platform dependencies in syncevo-dbus-server: keyring, network monitoring

2009-09-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 16:04 +0100, Frederik Elwert wrote: Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 20:38 +0200 schrieb Patrick Ohly: # Controls password storage. Changing this setting does not # move the passwords themselves, which has to be done manually. # # config - store passwords

Re: [SyncEvolution] desktop platform dependencies in syncevo-dbus-server: keyring, network monitoring

2009-09-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
to be implemented immediately. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] desktop platform dependencies in syncevo-dbus-server: keyring, network monitoring

2009-09-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:34 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: Patrick Ohly wrote: So what does the sync-ui check at the moment? Is the diable sync because unconnected an --enable-gui=moblin exclusive feature because we only support ConnMan? Yes, although without any compile time checks. I

[SyncEvolution] status 2009-10-17

2009-09-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
not complete) servers. Currently we are not testing against those. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized

Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevo-dbus-server implementation: syncing works - also via Connection

2009-09-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 22:46 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 23:25 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: I'll continue to work on the sync-related methods. Because this is in a different part of the file, we should be able to merge changes easily. Hurray! It syncs! Spending some time

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: availability of local sources (was: syncevo-dbus-server implementation)

2009-09-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
'evolutionsource' named 'source_name' No. In this case, CheckSource() really means check the source settings currently in place (permanently or temporarily) for a source like addressbook. So we define 2 new APIs for this issue instead of doing them in getConfig/setConfig? Yes. -- Best Regards, Patrick

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: availability of local sources (was: syncevo-dbus-server implementation)

2009-09-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
SyncEvolution files in the 'addressbook' directory can be removed, including the directory if it is empty afterwards. See the implementation of the --remove options for an example how this is currently done. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only

[SyncEvolution] gdbus-cxx and methods in base classes

2009-09-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
around the problem by writing some glue code (Session::getConfig, Session::getReports, ...). I don't want to make the makeMethodEntry calls any more complex while there still is a chance to make them simpler. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only

Re: [SyncEvolution] gdbus-cxx and methods in base classes

2009-09-21 Thread Patrick Ohly
a template parameter. It would also allow us to bind arbitrary functions, not just class members. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position

[SyncEvolution] cmdline --keyring --print-config: should it show real password or -?

2009-09-21 Thread Patrick Ohly
if not. Would make checkPassword() more tricky, of course. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf

Re: [SyncEvolution] sync - Attributes mapping with servers

2009-09-21 Thread Patrick Ohly
. In contrast to the other properties, this is one that we can support locally. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized

Re: [SyncEvolution] cmdline --keyring --print-config: should it show real password or -?

2009-09-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
) login user. Once the user is logged in and the keyring is unlocked, the user has access to the passwords. Asking for the user password again isn't going to secure the data, it just makes our own app harder to use. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: availability of local sources (was: syncevo-dbus-server implementation)

2009-09-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
have changed and .other.ini is still intact. relevant is a bit hard to define, though. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: session ID

2009-09-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
it was already worded such that ignoring the the session ID was valid (The caller is responsible for ensuring that only messages belonging to this session are passed to future process() calls. - this automatically the case with OBEX). -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: availability of local sources (was: syncevo-dbus-server implementation)

2009-09-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus API: availability of local sources (was: syncevo-dbus-server implementation)

2009-09-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
the other method calls. We still need to define some D-Bus exceptions as part of the API. Jussi mentioned some in another email. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way

Re: [SyncEvolution] dbus api specification: errors

2009-09-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
the client is not attached. /doc:para org.syncevolution.Exception is already used in the new syncevo-dbus-server, in all cases. So we need to turn some of the other cases into more specific errors. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only

Re: [SyncEvolution] notes from design meetings last week

2009-09-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
on the syncevo-dbus-server first. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevo-dbus-server implementation: syncing works - also via Connection

2009-09-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 16:18 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Congu suggested the following example command: ./syncml-ds-tool --port BtMac BtChannel --sync text/x-vcard Contacts The corresponding SyncEvolution configuration (which must be created first) can be set up

Re: [SyncEvolution] libsynthesis_srv

2009-09-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
). This morning I implemented a rudimentary HTTP server in Python which uses the SyncEvolution Connection D-Bus API to pass messages into SyncEvolution. I'm still in the process of figuring out how to interact with the server engine, though. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content

Re: [SyncEvolution] libsynthesis_srv

2009-09-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 13:49 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: There is also a server config sample in the sysync_SDK/configs subdirectory (that's the one I have used in my tests). This morning I implemented a rudimentary HTTP server in Python which uses the SyncEvolution Connection D-Bus API

Re: [SyncEvolution] libsynthesis_srv

2009-09-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 16:29 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: At the moment I can start a sync session, but SessionStep() returns an error at some point. Need to look more closely into that before I can say more... I need to adapt to the reversed order of GOTDATA/NEEDDATA. Stay tuned... -- Best

[SyncEvolution] status 2009-10-07: SyncEvolution 0.9.1 beta 1, code cleanup, dbus-api branch rebased on it

2009-10-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
(out-of-tree SQLite backend, documentation); code clean up and renaming for 0.9.1 (#3472) * Jussi: sync-ui + network disconnects (#6515), major rewrite of GUI for 1.0 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am

Re: [SyncEvolution] lpia packages

2009-10-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
comes with a native SyncEvolution .rpm preinstalled, so there's no need for an extra package. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor

Re: [SyncEvolution] gdbus-cxx and methods in base classes

2009-10-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
in static structs). Global functions can be bound. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] Debugging a connection to Oracle Calendar Server

2009-10-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
when raw message dumping is enabled (= higher log level). It might be worthwhile to dump it also at lower levels. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's

Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevolution and oracle = transport failure

2009-10-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
by changing model/ manufacturer/ into manufacturerSonyEricsson/manufacturer modelK750i/model I picked the K750i as example here because the strings were in the documentation referenced by Lukas whereas I don't know what the strings for the Synthesis iPhone client are. -- Best Regards, Patrick

Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevolution and oracle = transport failure

2009-10-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
in libsoup doesn't get back anything from the server. This is something which has to be debugged at the network level with network dumps, to determine whether the SSL handshake works at all. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee

Re: [SyncEvolution] gdbus-cxx and methods in base classes

2009-10-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 17:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: I couldn't answer this without looking into the problem more thoroughly. The result is in the gdbus-cxx branch. This is still experimental. I need to split it up into smaller commits, want to set the ASYNC flag automatically (should

[SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 0.9.1 beta 1 released, SyncML server in 1.0 development branch

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
installation, follow the http://syncevolution.org/documentation/getting-started steps. -- Patrick Ohly, on behalf of everyone who has helped to make SyncEvolution 0.9.x possible: http://syncevolution.org/about/contributors ___ SyncEvolution mailing list

Re: [SyncEvolution] lpia packages

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:47 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 18:25 +0100, Frederik Elwert wrote: just a short egoistic notice: There seem to be no lpia packages for syncevolution 0.9. That's an oversight, my apologies. I've moved the build environment from estamos.de

[SyncEvolution] writing unit tests for our new D-Bus API

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
it only supports the standard options of unittest.main() (see --help). dbus-monitor buffers its output and doesn't flush it when exiting, which means that output is lost. Stupid dbus-monitor. No solution :-/ Here's the commit message with more information: Author: Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com

Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevolution and oracle = transport failure

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
, then the only suggestion I have is to wait until we had a chance to do interoperability testing with Oracle. Perhaps we'll learn something from it that applies to your setup or find a real problem. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although

Re: [SyncEvolution] gdbus-cxx and methods in base classes

2009-10-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
, Private); But this code here works: m_object.add(static_castTest2 *(this), Test2::test2, Private); -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's

Re: [SyncEvolution] writing unit tests for our new D-Bus API

2009-10-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:38 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: dbus-monitor buffers its output and doesn't flush it when exiting, which means that output is lost. Stupid dbus-monitor. No solution :-/ dbus-monitor has broken SIGINT handling and no handling of SIGTERM. Because of its brokeness, distros

Re: [SyncEvolution] writing unit tests for our new D-Bus API

2009-10-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:38 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: What do you think about this? As there were no cries of outrage, I went ahead and improved the test script. While extending the tests I already found different issues in the implementation: * Server.GetConfigs() missing

Re: [SyncEvolution] [os-libsynthesis] Base64 data line folding in vCard2.1

2009-10-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
, can you backport this to the master branch in libsynthesis on moblin.org so that we can include it in 0.9.1? I would have done it myself but ran out of time today. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] git status update + obexd update

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
part of the D-Bus API and obexd implementation, for example by declaring the message type as optional so that SyncEvolution knows that it might have to guess the type? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] git status update

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:08 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: For the development version leading towards 1.0, please use: * dbus-api in the syncevolution repo * multilib in the libsynthesis repo Typo, I meant unilib :-/ -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content

Re: [SyncEvolution] git status update + obexd update

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
the code in a debugger. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] Problem syncing recurring events with myFUNAMBOL v8

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] Problem syncing recurring events with myFUNAMBOL v8

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:46 +0100, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 18:13 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: myFUNAMBOL doesn't support detached recurrences, as far as I know. What you have sent to the server is a VEVENT with the same UID as the recurring event plus a RECURRENCE-ID

Re: [SyncEvolution] XML Failure on Jaunty

2009-10-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
. It applies to the current master branch, but should also work with the 0.9 sources when you patch the file src/syncevo/EvolutionSyncClient.cpp. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here

Re: [SyncEvolution] XML Failure on Jaunty

2009-10-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
test this. Can you compare whether different libs are used? Run ldd /usr/bin/syncevolution and then ldd on your self-compiled binary. Any relevant differences? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] SAN generating for obex transport

2009-10-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
different names? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] SAN generating for obex transport

2009-10-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

[SyncEvolution] git status update

2009-10-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
changed so that it commits into syncevolution-0-9-x. I merged master (= syncevolution-0-9-x) into dbus-api, and the plan is to move towards that branch without further disruptive rebasing. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 0.9.1 beta 2 released

2009-10-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:01 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Patrick, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com wrote: Hello! For those of you running the 0.9.1 beta announced last week, please update to beta 2. The bug hunt is still on, so please test

[SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution in Fremantle

2009-10-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
-client-do-it-yourself-style/ [8] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.syncevolution/136 [9] http://syncevolution.org/development/pim-data-synchronization-why-it-so-hard -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution in Fremantle

2009-10-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:22 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Patrick Ohly a écrit : I'm posting here because I hope that an interested developer or maintainer will step up and take over packaging for Maemo. You can be sure that this will have full support when it comes to merging patches

[SyncEvolution] superdatastore = combined events+todo (was: Re: SyncEvolution Bug 3182 - support ovi.com (Nokia sync service))

2009-10-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
out how to represent that in the GUI -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] superdatastore = combined events+todo (was: Re: SyncEvolution Bug 3182 - support ovi.com (Nokia sync service))

2009-10-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 01:02 +, Chen, Congwu wrote: Local Rejections: That would be solved by adding a superdatastore in SyncEvolution as pointed by Patrick, this will goto my todo list. http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4611 join/dejoin different sources -- Best Regards, Patrick

Re: [SyncEvolution] SE under Karmic Koala

2009-11-02 Thread Patrick Ohly
a sync. That should show whether it is a low-level network problem. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak

[SyncEvolution] code review: credential checking

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
://syncevolution.org/development/configuration-handling) on that branch. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized

Re: [SyncEvolution] Calendar Error in V 0.9 (could not read revision identifier...)

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
it| +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-+ I've created an issue for this, but feel free to respond here. http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7759 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel

Re: [SyncEvolution] SE under Karmic Koala

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
apps. Ubuntu now has a native package for SyncEvolution. Can you reproduce it using that package? In any case, can you file a bug with Ubuntu? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here

Re: [SyncEvolution] SE under Karmic Koala

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
you got is an unresponsive server which doesn't reply to the TCP connection request or SyncML message within 1 minute, causing SyncEvolution to resend. The issue that Jim had shows up as a real problem detected by libsoup. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal

[SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 0.9.1 released

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
://syncevolution.org/documentation/getting-started -- Patrick Ohly, on behalf of everyone who has helped to make SyncEvolution 0.9.x possible: http://syncevolution.org/about/contributors ___ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http

Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 0.9.1 released

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 21:00 +, Patrick Ohly wrote: There are some known issues, see below. The more issues get reported and fixed, the sooner there will be a 0.9.2 maintenance update, so keep the reports coming. I wondered whether I should delay 0.9.1, but then decided against it because

Re: [SyncEvolution] memo not supported by backends (0.9.1)

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
a SyncEvolution config template for Funambol installed under /etc/default or /usr/etc/default? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I

Re: [SyncEvolution] code review: credential checking

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
tested the code. So you think the SafeConfigNode::escape(): did not work correctly for strings with ! in them patch doesn't solve that issue? Probably a unit test is due for that code. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am

Re: [SyncEvolution] memo not supported by backends (0.9.1)

2009-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
/Funambol/memo is uri = note no type info. That's okay. The default type for memo is in the code, so the template doesn't have to specify it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make

Re: [SyncEvolution] memo not supported by backends (0.9.1)

2009-11-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
in Evolution before the local database really exists. Running syncevolution without parameters shows whether there is any memo database on the computer. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make

Re: [SyncEvolution] memo not supported by backends (0.9.1)

2009-11-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
, everything else is only available built-in. I'm asking because strictly speaking, we shouldn't be using /usr/etc, but /etc. However, that makes packaging more complex because we would have to define the files as user-controlled configuration files. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content

[SyncEvolution] code review: automatic D-Bus testing + Session.Sync()

2009-11-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
of them merged into master up to and including synevo-dbus-server: Session.Sync() signature fix. Yongsheng, this is in your area of work, so would you mind reviewing the changes? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee

Re: [SyncEvolution] Calendar Error in V 0.9 (could not read revision identifier...)

2009-11-10 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 06:30 +, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 22:38 +, Oskar Welzl wrote: This is with 0.9 and Evolution 2.26.3 Can you upgrade to 0.9.1, released yesterday? Perhaps we really made some relevant change between 0.9 and 0.9.1, although I don't remember

Re: [SyncEvolution] libpcre.so.3 on Fedora 11

2009-11-10 Thread Patrick Ohly
://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7913 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter

Re: [SyncEvolution] Syncing multiple task lists

2009-11-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
that help? -- Best Regards Patrick Ohly Senior Software Engineer Intel GmbH Open Source Technology Center Hermuelheimer Strasse 8a Phone: +49-2232-2090-30 50321 Bruehl Fax: +49-2232-2090-29 Germany

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >