.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Rainer Gerhards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: syslog-sec@employees.org
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 6:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Syslog-sec] AD Review for draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-14
Hello all,
I have thought quite a while about Sam's very good message
WG,
Another alternative would be to use the precedent set (and already
accepted by the IESG) in the SSH IDs. This would mean that the
IANA-registered SD-ID params could not use the @ character.
See section
6 of draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-22.txt and Section 4.6.1 of
Hi Rainer,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
3) Backward compatibility and versioning are not really discussed.
You define semantics of the version field but these semantics
require the sender to be configured with the version that the
receiver will support. Is this
Hi Again,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
5) I don't think x- as a prefix is such a good idea for vendor use SD.
It seems like that some way of identifying the vendor would be
better; possibly something based on OIDs, enterprise numbers, or
domain names. The problem with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Hartman
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 3:59 AM
To: syslog-sec@employees.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Syslog-sec] AD Review for draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-14
Hi. A few weeks ago you
Hi. A few weeks ago you submitted draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-14 for
publication as a proposed standard. The first step in that process is
review by the responsible AD, me.
here are my comments. The working group needs to respond to these
comments; responses can come in the form of answers
