Why?
Because the community implementing syslog protocol things seems to be
ignoring what the group has been doing.
This may be because they're unaware of the work or because it is being
regarded as a WTF?! and doing their own thing.
Most people seem to be ignoring 3195. Lets learn from that
Hi All,
I am finding that the people contributing to the mailing list are making
progress in defining a useful protocol. I also see that they are
discussing implementation details. Both of these tell me that we're on
the right track.
What we found in Vancouver is that we were on the wrong
I see it the other way round. If the charter can be specific, it should
be, to keep the subsequent discussion focussed on the more contentious
areas. Based on the post-Vancouver discussion, I see no alternative
to including PRI and if that is the case, then we should nail that
down now.
