DM wrote: what further clarification...?Biblical interpretation and
theological understanding . go hand in hand...these Holy Scriptures are
correlated to God's self revelation..they themselves may not be interpreted
aright except in the light of the knowledge of God which He continues to
mediate
No person from the first to the last is excluded
from that which is accomplished in the second Adam, Jesus. Some have referred to
this as a "double movement" : God toward man and man toward God.Both take place
in the God/Man.You two (DM JT) perhaps along with others on TT are saying:
This
With someone like yourself, a very model of
Christian "unity" and "harmony" as a contributor, I've no difficulty whatsoever
imagining these 250+ persons speaking with essentially one voice on matters
pertaining to God and the Gospel.May I have a chorus of Amens from the assembled
TT
It's good to have another contributor. On this matter would you just
outline for me what you believe to be the "sequence"? Who are the "players"?
What happened to bring about a "falling out of favor between them"? How then
does a "coming back together" actually taking place"? I seem to sense
In his new book"the Passion of Jesus Christ", John Piper lists "fifty
reasons why He came to die". Reason #1 To absorb the wrath of God. May I take a
poll, not as to this reason being #1 but rather, do you all agree that this
should be on the list as stated? Blessings, Lance
-
Very cute Lance. You just can't seem to get away from
the ad-hominem
can you? How true thatthe student
becomeslike teacher and Calvinists
do so resemble their master in spite of the obvious.
Being void of mercy is
not a godly trait. You ask no questions and form harsh
opinions with
scant
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No person from the first to the last is excluded
from that which is accomplished in the second Adam, Jesus.
jt: Of course they are - everyone who
loves and believes the lie is automatically excluded.
Some have referred to this as a "double movement" :
Why not see what Jesus Himself says about the "reason
he came into this world?" He says why in John 9:39 "For judgment I am come
into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see
might be made blind"
Certainly does notsound so "all inclusive" to
me. Perhaps the
In order to make this as simple as possible. I will use a text prepared for little children. I will only quote it up to a point, where I will then ask a question. All you TTer's feel free to answer Jenny'squestion!
FAMILY HOME EVENING 1972 Corporation of the President of the C of J C of L D S
pg
ROTFL
This place gets wierder every day!Daniel Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Truth Talk Subscribers:Joyous New Moon Greetings (see Isaiah 66) in the Matchless Name of YahShua (Jesus)!!!A couple of days ago, Brother Chris informed me that he posted my article on Romans 7 to this forum and got
Izzy: No trap! I've got nothing against repentance.
It's just that I believe that it follows being forgiven. Blessings,
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 21, 2004 07:46
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Hi Judy,
Please consider the following quotes:
When Adam sinned, sin entered the entire
human race. Adams sin brought death, so death spread to everyone,
for everyone sinned. Yes, people sinned even before the law was given.
And though there was no law to break, since it had not yet
Lance wrote:
... (what of) disagreements that are not overcome
merely by appeal to the Holy Scriptures.
... APPEAL MUST BE MADE BEYOND ALL ECCLESIASTICAL
AUTHORITY OR BIBLICAL CITATION TO THE truth of God
for that is the supreme authority to which all must
submit and on which everyone
Lance wrote:
No person from the first to the last is excluded
from that which is accomplished in the second Adam,
Jesus. Some have referred to this as a double movement:
God toward man and man toward God. Both take place
in the God/Man.
I don't think I have much of a problem with this
Oh, well, at least you think it is
necessary. Kind of like the faith and works thing. J Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004
6:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Forgiveness/Repentance
Lance wrote:
I've got nothing against repentance. It's just
that I believe that it follows being forgiven.
Why then, in the following story that Jesus told, does it appear that
the publican's repentance resulted in his justification before God
whereas the unrepentant Pharisee remained
Jim Elsman wrote:
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A COUPLE OF YOUR IDEAS:
1. HOW CAN YOU KNOW THAT YOU CONCEIVED A CHILD AT
THAT VERY MOMENT OF CONCEPTION, WITH ACCURACY?
EVEN YOUR WIFE DID NOT KNOW, NOR COULD NOT HAVE KNOWN.
THIS IS SCIENCE. YOU HAVE DEPARTED FROM SCIENCE.
PEOPLE HAVE TO
In a message dated 4/21/2004 5:39:08 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In his new book"the Passion of Jesus Christ", John Piper lists "fifty reasons why He came to die". Reason #1 To absorb the wrath of God. May I take a poll, not as to this reason being #1 but rather, do you
JT said: 250+ women..most of the time we all say
the same thing. On TT..different theologians...doctrines of demons..Judy,
wherein have I misrepresented you? Jonathan perhaps spoke with more kindness
than many concerning your "attitude" and, we have yet to hear (read) your
response.
Hi David,
I hold the same position as Lance does here. Grace is always first.
First of all the story below was before Christ died and rose again. I would suggest
that the forgiveness for all of our sins is included in what Christ did on the cross.
If Christ can say, It is finished then it
Hi David,
Hope you don't mind me answering your questions as well.
1) I do not hold to Calvin's concept of Limit Atonement. I know of no other doctrine
that has done as much damage to the Church as this one. That being said I deeply
respect Calvin and understand why he formulated this
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings y'all in the Matchless Name of YahShua !
- Original Message -
From: "Hughes Jonathan"
Sent: 04/21/2004 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Forgiveness/Repentance
JH wrote:
If Christ can say, "It is finished" then it either is finished (taken care
From: "Jonathan Hughes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Hi Judy, Please
consider the following quotes:When Adam sinned, sin entered the entire human
race. Adams sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned. Yes, people sinned even before
the law was given. And though there was no law
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings Jonathan et al in the Matchless Name of YahShua
!
You may ignore any part of any reply that I make. That is a free will
issue.
Ahava b'
YahShua
(Love in The SAVIOUR)
Baruch YHVH,
(Bless The LORD)
Bro. Chris
a servant of
YHVH
Firebrand is right :)
Just the wrong kind of fire. Are you still on the
road Kevin?
judyt
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ROTFL
This place gets wierder every day!Daniel Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear
Truth Talk Subscribers:Joyous New Moon Greetings (see Isaiah 66) in
the
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings y'all in the Matchless Name of YahShua !
Those awesome three words refer to the
payment made for sin (as opposed to "sins"). That is "it".
YahShua died so that I don't have to die
... yet most will anyway. YahShua
rose so that I might live ... yet most
DAVEH SAYS: Give us the quotes, Kevin. If they don't specifically say "physical contact" or "sexual intercourse", then your interpretation that is vastly different (and opposite) of my belief, and the belief of all the other LDS folks I know. I've never met an LDS person who understands it the
Jonathan, I wanted to address your concern
below.
My big concern here is that I think most people give
Adam far more credit than Christ. We are so quick to show how we
have all sinned in Adam but rarely will you hear that we all rose again in
Christ. The passage above clearly compares
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy Taylor
wrote:
a) A covenant by nature requires the death of both
parties.
DAVEH: I'm lost on this one, Judy. Would you be so kind as to
explain
why you believe such, please?
jt: I may not have expressed myselfvery well but
blood covenants are
G, we may never agree on Polanyi. I know we
share a great respect for Calvin and his Institutes. And U2 has long been one of
my favorite groups. Maybe two out of three ain't bad?
Thanks for sharing
this.
Bill
Bill, What's the relationship betw the
Bible, John Calvin, Polanyi, and U2?
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Yes, Adams
one sin brought condemnation upon everyone, but Christs one act of
righteousness makes all people right in Gods sight and gives them life.
You are making no sense to me whatsoever.
All people are not
right in God's sight. Most of
Hi
Terry,
This
is not my sentence. This is a direct quote from Romans. This is
Paul's sentence.
Jonathan Hughes Supervisor of Application Support Kingsway Financial 905-629-7888
x. 2471
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Terry
Mr. Elsmanlaw,
Have you ever considered putting 2 Corinthians 10:5
into operation in your life
as a believer? You have some wild imagination - I
would try to reign it in if I were you.
What kind ofPentecostal is this
judyt
DAVID,
RESPECTING THAT THE MARRIAGE BED IS UNDEFILED, AND THAT
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings Jonathan et al in the Matchless Name of YahShua
!
- Original Message -
From: Hughes Jonathan
Sent: 04/21/2004 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Calvinism
This
is not my sentence. This is a direct quote from Romans. This is
Paul's sentence.
Terry
This looks like Romans 5:19 from the New Living
translation which is a paraphrase.
andyou probably read from the "majority text"
which is why you don'trecognize
this phraseas being "the words of
Paul".
The KJV reads "For as by one man's disobedience many
were made sinners, so
by the
Note
that the New Living translation is just that, a translation, not a
paraphrase. Do not confuse this with the Living Bible which was a
paraphrase. I have listed a bunch of translations
below:
The
KJV (far from a "majority text" in our day and age) is as
follows:
12
¶
Hey Judy, what have I missed? From where does this
quote originate: "The Lord
knows those who are his and let everyone who names the name of the Lord claim
by faith in their doctrine that the atonement covers
theiriniquity?" (see 2 Timothy 2:9).
Bill
- Original Message -
What kind of Bible you usin' Jonathan? I checked three versions and
none of them say,"all people are now right in God's sight".
Terry
.Hughes Jonathan wrote:
Hi Terry,
This is not my sentence. This is a direct quote from
Romans. This is Paul's sentence.
Jonathan Hughes
Hey Judy:
I checked three versions and that wording was not in any of them. I
see a giant gap between "MANY" and "ALL". One word change changes the
whole message.
Thanks for telling me where he got his info, 'Cause I knew it wasn't in
my Bibles.
Terry
Judy Taylor wrote:
Terry
It's what I am hearing from you, Lance, and Jonathan -
and what the committe of Baptists who worked on the New Living Translation
apparently believed when they changed Romans 5:19 to read as:
'Yes, Adams one sin brought condemnation upon
everyone, but Christs one act of righteousness
I'm not sure what you're looking for, but one thing
they all have in common is theministry of the Holy Sprit.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:06
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] fyi~g
G,
Hi
Terry,
The
'many' when referring to Adam is definitely all. Therefore, the 'many'
when referring to Christ must also be all. Otherwise we are playing with
apples and oranges. I am sure you would disagree if I said that many (but
not all, just some) became sinners through Adam. The
Committe of Baptists? Sigh. Please see below. It was
done by far more than a Baptist Committe.
The NLT Translation Committee
The Tyndale House website assures the reader that "all of the
Bible scholars and stylists involved in this work are evangelicals who accept
the Bible as the inspired
Judy, I still don't get it. Whose words are these?
"The Lord knows
those who are his and let everyone who names the name of the Lord claim by
faith in their doctrine that the atonement covers
theiriniquity?" (see 2 Timothy 2:9).
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
I know Jonathan, I have the translation but don't spend
much time in it. Tyndale House published the Living Bible paraphrase and I'm
assuming that this is a rewrite of that with the oversight ofthese learned
ones.
ROMANS/GALATIANS Gerald Borchert, The Southern Baptist
Theological
I wrote the words as you well know Bill; to me they
reflect what I hear you and those of the same persuasion saying
when you speak of theall-inclusivity of the
incarnation. Are you sure this doctrine will hold you "in that day?"
judyt
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy, I still don't
No wonder the first Adam gets more credit - this is
where most professing Christians live and it is very evident on TT where DavidM
was ridiculed and all but stoned for daring to speak ofSanctification
which wasthen termed "Christian Perfection" in the subject
line.
Judy, just a point of
I do also Terry,
You were on the ball to catch this and it makes me realize what a potential
problem all of these
different translations arebecoming. I have many of them but
always return to the KJV. The
NIV is bad enough with all of it's ommissions and now this. Makes me
want to weep for
The doctrine doesn't have to hold me, Judy. The
object of my faith is JesusChrist. He is the one who will hold us both in
that day. After all, it is not faith which saves us, but he in whom we have
faith.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua !
My preference is the exegeses Bible. It is the
only one since KJV to use only the same manuscripts as KJV.
The translator, transliterator and exegete was one Herb Jahn (recently
deceased after 85 blessed years). He was
I don't have a problem with the term in and of itself
because being perfect and being holy are one and the same. I believe I read the
message where you were asking if it was an April Fools joke, that and some of
the stuff that Elsmanlaw wrote ridiculing him about his belief in this
I don'y care if we are talking about pears and cumquats. All are not
right with God. Look around you. You will see.
Terry
Hughes Jonathan wrote:
Hi Terry,
The 'many' when referring to Adam is definitely all.
Therefore, the 'many' when referring to Christ must also be all.
Meaning that
your view of humanity is above the view of scripture? That when scripture
says one thing and you say another, then you win? Is this what you don't
care about? More likely you are saying that this passage does not jive
with your experience; this of course is not a test of truth.
David: You've framed this as a have you stopped beating your wife
question. My answer is yes. You've mischaracterized most of the rest of it.
Perhaps someone with more patience than I (Bill, Jonathan) will take the
time to explain. You don't, in the end, have to agree. In the beginning
however,
He won't be holding us in that day unlesswe
havebeen obedient and serving Him in all of the days preceding that one
becauseHe is the bread of Life, we feed on Him and not the other way
around. It's us who must hold to the head, In
(Col 2:18,19) we are warned to "Let no man beguile you
of
Judy, maybe you should shop off your right hand.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:02
PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Calvinism
He won't be holding us in that day unlesswe
havebeen obedient and
From: "Hughes Jonathan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meaning that
your view of humanity is above the view of scripture? That when scripture
says one thing and you say another, then you win? Is this what you don't
care about?
jt: Scripture
does not say what you are claiming it says Jonathan, you are
The object is Jesus Christ. But it is He who gave His commands doctrine in the Holy Scriptures.
Jesus is the Object
The Scriptures are the instruction book!"Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The doctrine doesn't have to hold me, Judy. The object of my faith is JesusChrist. He is the one
Just got back from Arizona.
We are headed to Washington DC This weekend
Saturday preach to the Festival of Resistance!
http://sept.globalizethis.org/
Sunday preach to this crowd:
NOW, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, etc.
http://www.million4roe.com/
With a couple of Major league ballgames thrown
2 Samuel 21:19:
THE NIV
"...Elhanan son of Jaare-Oregim the Bethlehemite killed Goliath the Gittite, who had a spear with a shaft like a weaver's rod."
THE AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION
"...Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of
FYI
The known texts fall in to one of two groups, the Majority or AlexandrianThe "Majority text" is a statistical construct of the plurality of extant Greek manuscripts.
The Majority of which are of the Authorized version type text
Hughes Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that the New
Goodness, I had no idea all of this is going on; what do you do at
The Festival of Resistance? Tell them only Jesus can give them
justice
and make them free? Sure would love to hear a report about what
you
are finding out there. Is resistance to the Word getting worse or
holding?
Thanks for
Hi Jonathan, Terry, and
all,
In the NT
whenpolloi (many) is used in reference to the saving work of
JesusChrist (see Mrk 10.45; 14.24; Rom 5.19; Heb 9.28), the Semitic
inclusive sense is to be understood, i.e. Jesus died for all (cf. 1Tim 2.6; Heb
2.9). Indeed when Paul writes of the one
That is right ONLY Christ can make them FREE INDEED!!!
JN 8:31-32
I can see a great deal of damage done in young people.
The kids are really messed up and searching for answers.
They crave answers and swamp our guys firing question after question at them, like a
Jonathan:
I was not placing my experience above scripture. I was saying that You
are wrong, wrong, wrong! Many does not mean all. Many does not even
mean a majority. Many does not mean most. My Bible says "Many". To
think it means all is to say that Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy are
right with
Hi Judy,
Your reply makes me smile a bit, not in
any mischievous way but just over a simple understanding. You say that I
am holding to a Calvinistic interpretation/doctrine. In fact you say such
things in most of your emails to Lance, Bill and I. What you fail to
realize is that I am
OOH Now I understand.
HN "The Many"
It was so unclear till now.
Poor ol Holy Spirit could not help but with the help of a cemetary education and cracking the whip on that ol flesh, now my eyes are open!
"The many" What a good name for a band.
Was it not you who likes U2?
What is it, with
Peace, brother.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:16
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Calvinism
OOH Now I understand.
HN "The Many"
It was so unclear till now.
Poor ol Holy Spirit could
Why do you like such a Filthy mouth like Bono?"Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peace, brother.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Calvinism
OOH Now I understand.
HN "The Many"
It
Jonathan wrote:
I hold the same position as Lance does here.
Grace is always first.
Hey, I hold to that position too. Grace is always first. Grace and
forgiveness are not the same thing.
Jonathan wrote:
I would suggest that the forgiveness for all
of our sins is included in what Christ
I don't think I've ever heard Bono say anything
filthy. I listen to his songs and enjoy them immensely. Aren't you the
eat-the-meat-and-spit-out-the-bones guy. Lighten up.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21,
Hi Terry,
Assuming you are not calling me a
blithering idiot here, please do some exegesis. In other words work out
the logic of what Paul is saying. I hope you are not misunderstanding me
in thinking that I am saying that all are now saved? I am only saying
that all are included in
No that was Terry.
Bono is such a wonderful example of christianity!
"I'd like to give a message to the young people of America, and that is; we shall continue to abuse our position and #%#%#% up the mainstream."Bono '94 Grammy's
At the 2003 Golden Globe Awards, the U2 frontman described the
Ack replying to my own post. Am I
getting old?
When I mention You are with your
view below, agreeing with Calvin in one of the five major points of
Calvinism. I should have said that you agree with Calvinism (that
which Calvins followers developed), not with Calvin himself.
Calvin did
From: "Jonathan Hughes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Hi Judy, Your reply
makes me smile a bit, not in any mischievous way but just over a simple
understanding. You say that I am holding to a Calvinistic
interpretation/doctrine. In fact you say such things in most of your
emails to Lance, Bill and I.
Hey no problem,
I would prefer to discuss the Word of God aside from
the input of any "great" theologian.
Wouldn't it be something if we could trust the Holy
Spirit to do what Jesus sent Him to do?
judyt
From: "Jonathan Hughes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ack replying to my own
post. Am I getting
Bill,
Thank you for taking the time to explain
the greek side of this. I appreciate it. There is so much we have
to learn from you.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wm. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004
6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL
No, I am not referring to you as a blithering idiot. That description
is for those who think that Bill and Ted are saved. You no longer fit
that description now that you have clarified what you mean. For a good
while there, it looked like you figured everyone had free fire
insurance, no matter
Dear David,
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua!!!
David, you said:
You are welcome here as long as you do
not flame other members. We do not allow attacking list members, such
as pronouncing curses on them, nor do we allow deriding them in how they
practice their faith.
Daniel
Lance wrote:
David: You've framed this as a have you stopped
beating your wife question.
I did? I fail to see that, so I must have really misunderstood you.
Lance wrote:
My answer is yes. You've mischaracterized
most of the rest of it.
Sorry.
Lance wrote:
Perhaps someone with more
TTers, I thought I might submit this work for your
consideration. It takes into view several of the topics of today's discussion:
Predestination, Limited Atonement, The One and The Many. Please enjoy. Bill
Taylor
Re-Thinking Calvin's Horrible Decree
(c)1998 W.
Thomas Taylor
John Calvin
Hughes Jonathan wrote:
Another verse you will want to consider is 1
Corinthians 15:22: (KJV)
22For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ
shall all be made alive.
Here the King James Version uses the word 'all' and the concept of from
death to life. Would we now say that inAdam
Jonathan wrote:
Hope you don't mind me answering your questions as well.
Of course not. Welcome to the party! :-)
Jonathan wrote:
1) I do not hold to Calvin's concept of Limit Atonement.
I figured that out by now. :-)
Jonathan wrote:
2) I do not believe in universalism, that
all
Chris wrote:
The old song says, He paid a debt I could
not pay. Actually, He did pay that debt, yet
many will pay it again by their own death because
they refuse His payment.
Have you ever thought about the logic of this? If Jesus paid our debt,
then our debt could not be forgiven
Chris wrote:
My preference is the exegeses Bible.
I have one here, Chris, so I am ready to discuss with you. :-)
Chris wrote:
It is the only one since KJV to use
only the same manuscripts as KJV.
Actually, Green's literal translation also used the same manuscripts as
the KJV. You are
Judy Taylor wrote:
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy Taylor wrote:
a) A covenant by nature requires the
death of both parties.
DAVEH: I'm lost on this one, Judy. Would you be so kind as to
explain
why you believe such, please?
jt: I may not have expressed
Thanks to everyone who has commented on the many and all translation. I find the posts interesting and informative. Laura
Jonathan wrote:
The passage makes no sense if 'many' is not 'all'
which is why some translations use 'all' instead
of 'many'. Please give us your exegesis on this
passage on how the many when referring to Adam is
all of us, and how the many when referring to Christ
is just some of us.
Daniel wrote:
Do you mean like the way Ruben non-Israel
flamed and attacked me? I pointed out
legitamate sin in Judy's life, Ruben the
clown reviled me. Either way, you are a
hypocrite. You allow Ruben to flame me
and yet I am warned because I flamed Judy.
You can't have it
David Miller wrote to Judy:
Bill and Lance sometimes are as if they are
'speaking in tongues' around you because you
do not understand their words. Therefore,
they should try and explain their words in a
way that you can understand it.
Sherrie wrote:
Please help me if I've missed
Bill wrote:
The thing that I have to accept, though, in this realization --
or perhaps I should say, the thing I do not know how to explain
any other way -- is that this is God doing something greater
than physical science can explain. Would you agree with this?
No, I'm not sure I would
4/21, Judy:
Actually progressive
sanctification should be considered normal Christian
living.
why?
G ~ P
235
Lance wrote:
It seems to me that a distinction needs to be
drawn between duality dualism.
Please draw the distinction for us.
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to
David Miller wrote:
To my knowledge, I have never taken anything
that you have said personally. You have never
made a personal remark toward me that I can
remember.
John wrote:
I am curious. You were very critical of me for
slinging judgments and using ad hominem attacks.
by
Judy wrote:
Would you agree with me that the spiritual
created the material ie: Jesus called the
worlds into existence by the Word of His Power?
Yes.
Judy wrote:
and would you also agree that as Jesus gave the
analogy - when a person is born of the spirit
the wind bloweth where it
Just read your novel-got lost in the middle and am replying to the part
quoted below:
That hidden file is probably Thumbs.db which, I believe, keeps track of
the images for Thumbnail view.
**
Finally, I still
96 matches
Mail list logo
