jt: I agree with James that faith(without
corresponding actions - read obedience) is dead being alone.
So here we are back to life vs death.
Judyt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:24:45 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy Taylor wrote:
jt: No problem DaveH; all
I'm
jt: What is this Bill some
kind of gnosticism? God's Spirit anoints and works alongside God's Word -
so "How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how
shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear
without a preacher? And how shall
If I
read you correctly, you're asking "Does God allow people to worship him
differently than the Jewish?" And the answer ifs Yes. One of my professors sees
the Jerusalem Council in Acts as permission to
denominationalize.
There
are other factors involved. Can one still be a believer and
That
could be another conclusion to draw, John.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005
00.11To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Mormon Related Different
Why
don't you? You ask him, then I'll do the cross examination,
okay?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005
20.25To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk]
I
guess I just butted right on in there for the underdog, didn't I? I think it
comes from those awful attorneys I work with. They taught me. It's their fault.
They made me do it.
:)
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
The
below is something I definitely did not write. Please pay no attention to the
intro line, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:21
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
I
don't have a problem with how long it takes to answer, Dave. I miss many a post
myself. It's a combination problem...sometimes I don't get them, sometimes I
don't read them. Sometimes I simply don't want to answer because I know it will
get me nowhere and I'd rather waste my time on
Oh,
man...that answer was a disappointment. I thought for SURE you'd have a harem or
something. Only ONE? I thought you guys were supposed to try to keep up with
Solomon!
Do you
know any Mormons who have more than one wife?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nah...it was written by Izzy...in response to Bill
Taylor
Bill it appears to me
that your theological construct forces one to believe that the worst thing you
could do is to tell someone about Jesus Christ. If they never hear about
Jesus they are guaranteed a ticket to heaven. If
Thank
you, Bill. I don't think I'll pursue the 'negative-option marketing' plan just
now. It is not a good way of putting it. I am the slow one--I think slowly, and
communicate slowly, and when I rush I get it wrong.
I am
trying to work out all of what the Trinitarian position means. I
Christians: Those who worship the One true God who has REVEALED Himself through the Bible.
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: Sorry to be so tardy with this, Izzy Kay. I've had too many irons in the fire lately. So many questions to answer, and only so many hours to sleep. Tonight I'm
In a message dated 1/12/2005 8:42:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the mind is the home of faith which is wrong.
And for this you decided the guy was hell bound? Get a grip. The mind and where it places it's interests is used by Paul to define that which is spiritual and
In a message dated 1/12/2005 8:43:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kay, if you dont mind we would still like to hear DaveHs definition. Izzy
What was "our" definition, by the way?
JD
"Our"
definition continues to be overly vague and broad and, IMO, would still include
Dave H.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005
09.16To:
In a message dated 1/12/2005 9:27:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, there is that problem if you press it to the logical conclusion, isn't there? Same with the all-babies-go-to-heaven view. In that case, best kill your kid before s/he reaches the age of accountability,
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
8:17 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement
Prophets who speak lies are very apt to
pull people away
Dave Hansen wrote:
Perry mentioned that it was referring to judges
who judge in behalf of God (I hope I've got that
right, Perry). But if that were the case, I don't
understand why Jesus would refer to theos
(Jn 10:3435), suggesting a deity to be worshiped,
to be used in his defense.
The
Debbie, I hear you. We dont
have to have it all figured out thankfully. We just have to
trust and obey a loving God. BTW, I love the song Maybe Theres
a Loving God by Sara Grovesits so awesome. (Im
playing it on the computer as I type.) Izzy
Still
overly vague and broad. This would include many brands of people and many
different denominations.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin
DeeganSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 08.40To:
In a message dated 1/12/2005 10:07:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debbie wrote When I said God sees the end from the beginning, I didn't mean foreknowledge. I meant that the person's whole life-direction is one. And by that I meant, if they reject the message after
DAVEH: Thank you, Kevin. I appreciate your positively framed
answer. Now I more fully understand why you feel LDS folks should be
excluded from being considered Christian.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Christians: Those
who worship the One true God who has REVEALED Himself through the Bible.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
9:02 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
Bill it appears to me that your
theological
Slade Henson wrote:
Oh, man...that answer was a disappointment.
I thought for SURE you'd have a harem or something. Only ONE?
DAVEH: I thought coming to TT would be a good place to find another,
but now I'm not so sure :-\
I thought you guys were supposed to try to
keep
In a message dated 1/12/2005 10:57:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is it that whenever some TTers cannot agree on certain (usually non-essential) points of theology, instead of plainly explaining their position and then letting it go at that, they instead resort to
In a message dated 1/12/2005 11:26:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but the bottom line is "Are we walking in it" because we will be judged on "deeds done in the flesh" or "obedience" rather than what some are calling doctrinal "orthodoxy"
Yeah -- that pesky old doctrine
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You
caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the
sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has saved
everyone else,believers included.We do not need a
second gospel to get
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
10:21 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
In a message dated 1/12/2005 7:48:06 PM
Izzy in blue:
DAVEH: Sorry to be so tardy with this, Izzy
Kay. I've had too many irons in the fire lately. So many
questions to answer, and only so many hours to sleep. Tonight I'm
dragging my tail. (No jokes related to the devil, please!) LOL!!!
Anyway..Some folks consider
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I find curious is why you find the word Christian so sacred that it
must only include those who truly believe in Christ. Does one come into
relationship with Christ by joining the Christian religion, or by simple
faith in Jesus Christ?
Well, I have
Hehehe...
Reported or alleged to is very different than a definitive or a
resoundingYES, he did/does have three wives.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave
HansenSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 09.55To:
How
many denominations accept the Catechism? Or the deutero-canonical
books?
K.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005
10.09To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk]
But when I have trouble getting a definition from a
Christian (present company excluded, of course!) of Christian, it kinda makes me wonder why the reticence?
And that's just a simple question.
DaveH, since you have defined a mormon, I
will give my definition of a Christian. One
who is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
1:38 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
Slade Henson wrote:
How many wives do you have, Dave?
DAVEH: Just one,
That's perfectly fine, Debbie. I think (if I may
take a little license with what you wrote) that a lot of the misunderstandings
come in via the door of missed opportunities, and I mean on the part of the
Trinitarians, to fully answer questions when asked. I am fairly confident that
most
I will say this, however. I appreciate the
love Dave H has. His love far exceeds ANY one else. If there is one thing you
can learn from this man, it is love. I have no desire whatsoever to join the
Mormon Church and I know Dave H has no desire to become Messianic. Since we two
are
I would say -- "How about them Dodgers?"
Bill :)
What if
I said that "free moral agency" is a problem for God
-- who is not a free moral agent; that His "all
knowing" acclaim (a claim heeped on Him by others) is a comparative
statement, His knowledge compared to our
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:10:22 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a
message dated 1/12/2005 8:42:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
the mind is the home of faith
which is wrong.
And for this you decided
the guy was hell bound? Get a grip.
jt:
Perry, thanks for the thoughtful post. I
agree. Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 9:12 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is a Christian?
Bill Taylor wrote:
I was under the impression that the Carbon
dating of the blood from its bones had given
indication of a fairly recent date (within a few
thousand years).
I am unaware of any carbon dating being done on this specimen. Such a
thought would never enter the mind of the
Judy, You are impossible! If I answer you at all,
it will be ata time that I would otherwise be wasting anyway. I did
highlight one statement below. You can take a peak at it if you
like.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Now that you've vented, please go back and reread
what I've written.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 7:47
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
9:47 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
Now that you've vented, please go back and
Yeah, Izzy, I know. At that point I was just
beginning to brew. The pot boiled later on -- poor Debbie!I think that
your answer is a practical-outworking part of the full answer, but it
does not address the theological 'whys' of this issue. Like why were those
babies even alive in the first
Exactly. Iron sharpens iron.
(And mud muddies the muddled?) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
7:56 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Excuse me, Judy, for what do I need to repent? At
the time this took place you apologized to me for your accusation and admitted
that you had judged him without first understanding his position. Are you now
taking that back and turning on me? I am at a loss to know how to take you. You
Thanks for the helpful information. If you come across anything more, would
you please let me know about it. I am very interested.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 8:38 AM
Subject: Re:
jt: Howloving and how comforting for you to let
me know I am a waste of time Bill. Oh well, I can't say I expected much
more than a big "rejection" sticker from you - but then hope springs eternal :).
You are definitely not open to question or examine anything you have been taught
by the
jt: Bill if I apologized to you back then it may have
been for misunderstanding Newbigin, it certainly wasn't
for consigning him to hell which was your accusation
yesterday and which incidentally John has picked up on.
Amazing how bad news spreads. I am not turning on
you, nor am I reframing
Yeah, Izzy, I know. At that point I was just beginning to
brew. The pot boiled later on -- poor Debbie!I think that your answer is
a practical-outworking part of the full answer, but it does not address
the theological 'whys' of this issue. Like why were those babies even alive in
the
Bill, you call what I
wrote above venting??? I call it calm, sincere questions which you have
avoided answering by calling it venting.
This is what I would call venting:
Judy, You are impossible!
Bill
Izzy
I
am glad we are getting to know each other better. No, That is the truth!
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you were at least
to a certain degree edified by my contribution. I pray the best for you
all.
Bill Taylor
Very interesting this talk of plural wives
Any member of the "Utah" Mormons would be EX'ed if it was public knowledge or he publicly spoke of multiple wives in this life. Of course you can be sealed to more than one in the Temple. In the afterlife you can have a harem full.
Correct, so what is your point?Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still overly vague and broad. This would include many brands of people and many different denominations.
Kay
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Thursday,
My
pointis why do youcontinue to exclude David from the "Christian"
category? He said he worships GOD, though he believes there are other
gods.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin
DeeganSent: Thursday, 13 January,
Bill Taylor wrote:
Please do not take offense at this, but it concerns
me very much the way you are wont to re-direct
a discussion away from the big picture which holds
it all together. Perhaps this is not so great a problem
-- your method -- in the physical sciences, but I find
it quite
Bill Taylor wrote:
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you
were at least to a certain degree edified
by my contribution. I pray the best for
you all.
I have greatly appreciated your contribution. I consider you to be the
greatest theologian on TruthTalk. I sure hope you are not saying goodbye
Nice talk, Bill. I did ask
questions for clarification, and this is what I get? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
10:31 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are
Bill Taylor wrote:
I am fairly confident that most Trinitarians would agree
with me on the wooing. I am certain that James and
Thomas Torrance do in fact believe this, and teach it
(although dear old J.B. is now deceased). The wooing
is but one aspect of a thoroughly participatory salvation
Oracles that should be
remembered, as spoken by David Miller! Izzy
-Original Message-
1.So rather than using my theology to interpret the
passage, I let the passage speak for itself and then adjust my theology
to
align with all the remaining passages of Scripture.
2.
Izzy wrote:
I agree that DaveH is a kindly person of exemplary
manners-his words are always loving. However,
is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning
religion? I think not.
We do have to be careful how we interpret love. I'm sure Jesus did not
appear to be loving the times he
Amen, David, amen. Izzy
-Original Message-
Now which of these two people, given the facts established, should be
considered to be the most loving? I think it would be Jack.
Proverbs 27:5-6
(5) Open rebuke is better than secret love.
(6) Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the
My pointis why do youcontinue to exclude David from the "Christian" category? He said he worships GOD, though he believes there are other gods.
Only God can really exclude him.
Now according to the definition I provided of Christian
One valid way of determining what fits that definition is to
David Miller wrote:
... the Lord told me that I was functioning as a
prophet ...
SLADE wrote:
How clear was this message? Was it riddled
with parables? Was the message clear, concise,
and very much to the point?
The message was very clear, but perhaps not the absolute clearest revelation
Perry wrote:
... if you want to open up the definition to include
everyone who may use the name of Christ in the
name of their Church, or may claim to believe in
Him but does not, and says they follow Him, but
do not, or claims that some strange alien jesus
from Kolob is the same one as the
I was just wanting your definition of Mormon you have since sent it.
Thanks
Do you disagree with the fact that for a Mormon the Living Prophet is the ultimate Authority on this earth?
How do you determine just WHEN to FOLLOW the PROPHET?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: Hey
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:54:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I read you correctly, you're asking "Does God allow people to worship him differently than the Jewish?" And the answer ifs Yes. One of my professors sees the Jerusalem Council in Acts as permission to
In a message dated 1/13/2005 4:44:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway..Some folks consider Mormons to be those who belong to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. A broader definition would be...Mormons are those who belong to one of the denominations
DavidM, perhaps we are not far apart but I still feel very uncomfortable with your definition
I knew a guy who told everyone how much he loved his wife.
He said he was never happier than when he was a married man and his wife was wonderful.
Anumber of years into the marriage they broke up after
HUH?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bill
TaylorSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 11.37To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk]
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you were at least
to a certain degree
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:23:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade Henson wrote:
How many wives do you have, Dave?
DAVEH: Just one, Kay.
But not because JSmith said so, right DaveH? Izzy
I don't think Dave or his lovely ever met Smith. Was it a temple
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:27:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade, I agree that DaveH is a kindly person of exemplary mannershis words are always loving. However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning religion? I think not. Izzy
You pretend that
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:33:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would say -- "How about them Dodgers?"
Bill :)
What if I said that "free moral agency" is a problem for God -- who is not a free moral agent; that His "all knowing" acclaim (a claim
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If they never hear about Jesus they are guaranteed a ticket to heaven.
Actually, once again, you missed the point. No one is saying this. Romans 2:15 -16 speaks only of a maybe situation :
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The term Christian as I have defined it does not lose all meaning. Only
those who profess an attempt to follow Christ would be included. This
would
exclude Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Pagans, etc. who do not see that
Jesus Christ holds such a
John says: Would God's tolerance of other religions , alla Ninevah
God did not TOLERATE Nineveh he laid it waste details in the Bible; Read it. Nahum 2:8,3:7
I think the interesting thing is God sends a preacher to one of Israels greatest enemies Asyria.
No wonder Jonah was not keen on the idea.
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One who is truly in (the real) Christ. (Not a member of a church.) How do we know if we are truly in the real Chist? Off the top of my head I will say we are:
1) Filled with His Spirit
2) Walk in His
David do you also use this approach on Sodomites?
If a Sodomite claims to follow Jesus is he a Christian?
If you tell him so don't you give him a False Hope?
That is the problem with your False definition.
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Charles Perry Locke
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:45:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, You are impossible! If I answer you at all, it will be at a time that I would otherwise be wasting anyway. I did highlight one statement below. You can take a peak at it if you like.
Bill
Where
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I find curious is why you find the word Christian so sacred
that it
must only include those who truly believe in Christ. Does one come into
relationship with Christ by joining the Christian religion, or by simple
faith in
David Miller wrote:
Bill Taylor wrote:
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you
were at least to a certain degree edified
by my contribution. I pray the best for
you all.
I have greatly appreciated your contribution. I consider you to be the
greatest theologian on TruthTalk. I sure hope you
Try
this
buk
buk buk buk b'gock!
:^
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005
16.12To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:13:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try this
buk buk buk buk b'gock!
:^
-- slade
AAA -- the theater of the mind
I've heard that eggs taste better than tripe?
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:54:45 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I
read you correctly, you're asking "Does God allow people to worship him
differently than the Jewish?" And the answer ifs Yes. One of my
professors sees the
That I
wouldn't know, but I would venture to guess, uh... YES! However, I'd have to ask my brother who
married a Mexican gal whose mother cooks a killer menudo (did I spell that
correctly?) -- or so I've heard. I eat vegetarian at his home (that's a joke...
kinda).
By the way,
If you knew you were going to die tomorrow, and you had a chance to tell me something, what would it be?
BYE!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:45:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, You are impossible! If I answer you at all, it will be at a time
Speaking of such, I am of the opinion (have
I ever been taught this???) that we are born with a propensity to sinnot actually already condemned by sin (since
we havent yet). So, in that case, anyone who dies prior to actually
sinning is not under Gods judgment, and does not go to hell. Is
Slade,
I agree that DaveH is a kindly person of exemplary mannershis words are always
loving. However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning
religion? I think not. Izzy
You pretend that your reality is Dave's and then you draw your
conclusion. Izzy believes thus and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you knew you were going to die tomorrow, and you had a chance to
tell me something, what would it be? I's like to know the answer to
that one from anyone on this list.
John
===
I would say that I am a little afraid because I have
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this age of
this and that. Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I ask...was it God you
heard
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:42:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=
In more than one place in God's word, we are warned not to add to or take from God's word. The punishment is having your name removed from the book of life if I
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:51:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, John... The financing on the home and property came through.. in duplicate. We can choose between two banks (Wells Fargo, I guess just took too long.).
By the way, warn Bill T for me. I plan on
So Sara has a new album out? I'd like to see her
and Troy again. I haven't seen them since I turneddown Sara's offer to
tour with them as her Sound Tech.
Jeff
Life makes warriors of us all.To emerge the victors,
we must armourselves with the most potent of weapons.That weapon is
John wrote:
Romans 2:15 -16 speaks only of a maybe
situation : ..their conscience either
accusing or defending them
In Christ, we have the assurance of our salvation
--- or, at least, some of us do.
...
Does either accusing or defending sound like
a
In a message dated 1/13/2005 1:30:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like the men of Nineveh pleased God by Believing
This belief produced outward fruit when they proclaimed a fast Jonah 3:5 repenting in sackloth ashes Jonah 3:6
Perry:
Two things -- your post
Terry, you are such a prick. It is bad enough that Judy monopolizes the
idiot portion of this forum to have you tack on such an insensitive comment.
You are an embarrassment to this forum.
Jonathan 'ticked off at how people have treated Bill, ticked off at how the
hypocrite and lying Judy gets
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:40:05 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allow me to chim in here.
Salvation is not a legal issue. Not any more. Do you presently claim
to be doctrinally correct about every biblical issue? Is there a chance,
perhaps a good chance that you will change your mind about some
In a message dated 1/13/2005 1:14:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2 Co 11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.
Perry, knowing Corinth the way we do, the above
Slade Henson wrote:
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this age of
this and that. Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
