Hi folks,
If you are a computer linguistic geek or a real programmer/geek at
heart (which, I think, is the very reason why you are on this mailing
list) you should come to the TSLUG meeting tonight. Ian?s mentioned it
already, but here again: he and I are going to spread the word why Ruby
Ruby is an awesome programming language entirely built upon the
concept of objects. While I just was astounded and excited when learning
Perl (because of its many features OO concepts...
How disappointing. Perl certainly doesn't limit it's usefullness only to the
Object-oriented elite. IMHO,
...I have a question from the (my) lingustic point of view...
Perl:
$string=hello, world;
substr($string, 20) =~ s/world/earth/; #alters $string
print $string #output: hello, earth
how do I chomp that thing in one line?
alex
-
To
sorry again: 20 - 6:-(
my gosh...
Alexander Horn wrote:
...I have a question from the (my) lingustic point of view...
Perl:
$string=hello, world;
substr($string, 20) =~ s/world/earth/; #alters $string
print $string #output: hello, earth
how do I chomp that thing in one line?
alex
Ruby can be your standard global-function type of language. You don't
have to define objects (though all the 'primitives' are still objects,
you don't have to think about them as such). But if you want to
over-ride the default + method for integers, you can (not that you would
to).
The way it
Yes, we will be having a meeting tonight at 6:30 in VH1232.
Nate
Peter Snoblin wrote:
Do we have a meeting tomorrow? I apologize if this was addressed, but
my email
was acting up and it appears I missed a few messages.
--
Peter Snoblin - http://www2.truman.edu/~pas577/
