Thanks for all the posts in this thread, would be vitally useful to me.
Some real novice questions:
- flup is not available? Does it imply we can no more have SCGI/WSGI
configuration?
- As with LightTPD, will SCGI/WSGI be faster compared to simple
proxying in NgineX?
- Any tutorial/guidance on
Sanjay wrote:
- flup is not available? Does it imply we can no more have SCGI/WSGI
configuration?
It is now available... Sadd's website was offline then...
- Any tutorial/guidance on how to configure SCGI/WSGI with Nginex would
help.
No tutorial that I know of, but between:
On 8/26/06, Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, it's only serving static content, there is no application.
And lighttpd only uses mod_alias, mod_access, mod_accesslog.
My point was that the memory leak is not in the core of lighttpd but in
some of it's modules. Since there is a
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 18:44 -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:43 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
The only solution I know of that's extremely high performance that
offers all of the features that you want is nginx [2], but its
documentation is largely in Russian. I can't read
As I said, it's only serving static content, there is no application.
And lighttpd only uses mod_alias, mod_access, mod_accesslog.
My point was that the memory leak is not in the core of lighttpd but in
some of it's modules. Since there is a choice which module to use to
connect to WSGI
Interesting, I have an instance of lighttpd serving only static files
for more than month and a half and it's total memory usage is less than
5MB.
So it must be same of the modules you used?
mod_scgi or mod_proxy?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hi Damjan,
Could you pl. list the lighty modules you have running
in your app. If possible, if you could also provide snippets
of your lighttpd.conf file, it would be useful.
Thanks,
/venkat
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 11:11 -0700, venkatbo wrote:
Hi folks,
Since flup is not *available* for some reason, Im looking to evaluating
lighttpd as a simple proxy to TG, based on the steps in:
http://www.turbogears.org/preview/docs/deployment/lighttpd.html#proxy
Could anyone tell me what
Thanks Cliff.
I just checked out Pound. May be I'm missing something, but other
than Load Balancing Reverse Proxy, I don't see it offering anything
more than what lighty alone can already do as per:
http://www.turbogears.org/preview/docs/deployment/lighttpd.html#proxy
I'll not be building a
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:36 -0700, venkatbo wrote:
Thanks Cliff.
I just checked out Pound. May be I'm missing something, but other
than Load Balancing Reverse Proxy, I don't see it offering anything
more than what lighty alone can already do as per:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:36 -0700, venkatbo wrote:
What I need is all the extra http functionality lighty provides over
and above what CherryPy (TG) can provide.
Sorry, somehow in my haste to reply I didn't see that last sentence:
what functionality are you hoping for?
Cliff
--
Thanks Cliff, for your observations.
Basically, I needed to provide support for:
- HTTP/1.1
- SSL (openssl)
- (Fast)CGI
- chroot()
- sessions
- static content
I thought lighty would be providing all except the sessions part,
which I was hoping to make it disk/file-based. The #
One problem with Lighty is that it leaks memory like a sieve [1]. I
audited it for a little bit and I gave up, it's a mess. I'd steer
clear of it, it will quickly ruin your day if you throw a lot of
traffic at it.
The only solution I know of that's extremely high performance that
offers all of
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:43 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
The only solution I know of that's extremely high performance that
offers all of the features that you want is nginx [2], but its
documentation is largely in Russian. I can't read Russian, but I was
able to figure it out (the
Bob,
Thanks for that insight :-)
I somehow got the impression lighty was the rage these days, second
only to apache. With this kink of a leak issue, unclear how it attained
that position ;!)
Will give nginx a try. Thanks.
/venkat
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:43 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
The only solution I know of that's extremely high performance that
offers all of the features that you want is nginx [2], but its
documentation is largely in Russian. I can't read Russian, but I was
able to figure it out (the
16 matches
Mail list logo
